|
|
Comparison of oil displacement mechanisms and performances between continuous and dispersed phase flooding agents
|
Zhe SUN,Xingcai WU,Xiaodong KANG,Xiangguo LU,Qiang LI,Weidong JIANG,Jing ZHANG
|
|
|
Table 2 Experimental scheme for fluid diversion ability evaluation.
|
|
Run No. | Injection mode | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | 1-1 | Constant speed | Water flood the core until the water cut reaches 98% | (0.83 PV & Cp=1 000 mg/L) polymer solution+(0.50 PV& Cp=2 000 mg/L) polymer solution | Subsequently, water flood the core until the water cut reaches 98% | 1-2 | Constant speed | 0.30 PV SMG(Y) +0.53 PV SMG(W) +0.30 PV SMG(Y) +0.20 PV SMG(W) | 2-1 | Constant pressure | (0.83 PV & Cp=1 000 mg/L) polymer solution +(0.50 PV & Cp=2 000 mg/L) polymer solution | 2-2 | Constant pressure | 0.30 PV SMG(Y)+0.53 PV SMG(W)+0.30 PV SMG(Y)+0.20 PV SMG(W) |
|
|
|