PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 47(5): 962-976 doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60109-4

Acid-base alternation diagenesis and its influence on shale reservoirs in the Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimusar Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China

WANG Jian1,2, ZHOU Lu,1,3,*, LIU Jin2, ZHANG Xinji4, ZHANG Fan4, ZHANG Baozhen5

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

2. Research Institute of Experiment and Detection, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, China

3. School of Geosciences and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

4. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, China

5. Fengcheng Oilfield Operation Area, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, China

Corresponding authors: *E-mail:zhoulu9@126.com

Received: 2019-10-13   Revised: 2020-04-10   Online: 2020-10-15

Fund supported: China National Science and Technology Major Project2017ZX05008-004-008
PetroChina Science and Technology Major Project2017E-0401

Abstract

The diagenesis and diagenetic facies of shale reservoirs in Lucaogou Formation of Jimusar Sag were studied by means of microscopic observation and identification of ordinary thin sections and cast thin sections, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope and electron probe tests. The results show that alkaline and acidic diagenetic processes occurred alternately during the deposition of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag. The evolution of porosity in the shale reservoirs was influenced by compaction and alternate alkaline and acidic diagenetic processes jointly, and has gone through three stages, namely, stage of porosity reduction and increase caused by alkaline compaction, stage of porosity increase caused by acid dissolution, and stage of porosity increase and reduction caused by alkaline dissolution. Correspondingly, three secondary pore zones developed in Lucaogou Formation. The shale reservoirs are divided into three diagenetic facies: tuff residual intergranular pore-dissolution pore facies, tuff organic micrite dolomite mixed pore facies, and micrite alga-dolomite intercrystalline pore facies. With wide distribution, good pore structure and high oil content, the first two facies are diagenetic facies of favorable reservoirs in Lucaogou Formation. The research results provide a basis for better understanding and exploration and development of the Lucaogou Formation shale reservoirs.

Keywords: acid-base alternation diagenesis ; porosity evolution ; shale oil ; shale reservoir ; Permian Lucaogou Formation ; Jimusar Sag ; Junggar Basin

PDF (18472KB) Metadata Metrics Related articles Export EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  Favorite

Cite this article

WANG Jian, ZHOU Lu, LIU Jin, ZHANG Xinji, ZHANG Fan, ZHANG Baozhen. Acid-base alternation diagenesis and its influence on shale reservoirs in the Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimusar Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China. [J], 2020, 47(5): 962-976 doi:10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60109-4

Introduction

The exploration and development of Jimusar shale oil in the Junggar Basin has gone through four stages: exploration, pilot test, breakthrough and expansion. In September 2011, Well Ji 25 pumped an average daily oil production of 11.86 m3 after being fractured at 3403-3425 m of the second member of the Permian Lucaogou Formation. Subsequently, a series of exploration and appraisal wells (Ji 23, Ji 28, Ji 30, Ji 173, Ji 174, etc.) were deployed and tested for oil production, discovering the shale oil of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in the Jimsar Sag. After 9 years of test development with "horizontal well + volume fracturing", "straight well + conventional fracturing", and optimized development method, according to the conventional reservoir volume method, the well-controlled reserves in the favorable area were calculated at 11.12×108 t, opening a new chapter in the exploration and development of large shale oil in western China. Since shale reservoirs feature continuous distribution, low porosity, low permeability and strong heterogeneity, single wells in shale reservoirs often have wide differences in production and poor continuous production capacity during development. How to predict and find the location of “sweet spots” and increase single well production is a practical means to realize economic and effective development of shale oil.

The distribution and quality of shale oil sweet spots are closely related to the sedimentary microfacies, diagenesis and other geological conditions. Shale reservoirs are often continuously affected by a variety of diagenetic processes, and the superposition and reformations of different diagenetic processes have a significant impact on shale porosity evolution and oil and gas accumulation inside the shale reservoirs[1]. Fluids in different diagenetic environments with different pH values have widely different impacts on reservoirs. Because feldspar, carbonate and zeolite are unstable in an acidic environment and are prone to dissolution of inorganic-organic acidic medium, acidic dissolution pores are readily created and widely distributed. With the deepening of study on diagenesis, alkaline diagenesis has gradually attracted the attention of researchers. Studies have shown that feldspar can also be dissolved under certain alkaline medium conditions. The direct dissolution of quartz and the perfection of relevant theories have confirmed the existence of alkaline diagenesis in oil-gas bearing basins[2,3,4,5]. Diagenetic fluids in a lake basin would change constantly with the evolution of diagenetic processes, and multiple alternations of acidic and alkaline diagenetic environments would end up with multiple pore development zones and significantly improve the reservoir physical properties[6].

The previous study on diagenetic processes of the Permian Lucaogou Formation shale reservoirs in the Jimsar Sag was slow in progress[7]. In this work, through a variety of experimental methods, diagenetic processes on the Lucaogou Formation shale reservoirs have been systematically investigated to find out the effects of acid-alkali alternation diagenetic processes on pore evolution and performance of the shale reservoirs.

1. Geological overview

The Jimusar sag is a secondary depression on the eastern uplift located in the secondary structure unit of the eastern Junggar Basin. It is bounded by thrust faults on the south, west and north (Fig. 1a) and is an irregular polygon on the plane with typical dustpan structure now (Fig. 1c). The Permian Lucaogou Formation in the sag was formed in a saline lake basin environment in the background of intracontinental rift valleys, and simultaneously affected by volcanic eruption and hydrothermal activity[8,9,10], it is composed of fine-grained mixed sedimentary rocks of semi-deep lake-deep lake facies[11,12,13,14,15,16].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.   Thickness contour map (a), composite stratigraphic column (b) and seismic profile (c) of Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar sag.


The Lucaogou Formation is divided into two members, P2l1 and P2l2 from bottom to top (Fig. 1b), and industrial oil flows have been obtained in "sweet spot sections" of the two members[7]. The upper part of P2l2 is the upper sweet spot section and the most important set of reservoirs in the Lucaogou Formation in the Jimsar Sag. This set of reservoirs consists of (tuff-bearing) tuffaceous dolarenite, (tuff-bearing) tuffaceous feldspar detrital fine sandstone, (tuff-bearing) tuffaceous dolomite debris sandstone with gray mudstone, and dolomitic mudstone. The upper part of the P2l1 is the lower sweet spot section, and is mainly composed of (tuff-bearing) tuffaceous dolomitic siltstone, (tuff-bearing) tuffaceous argillaceous siltstone, and gray mudstone.

2. Basic characteristics of the reservoirs

According to core description and thin section identification results, the Lucaogou Formation is thin and strong in longitudinal heterogeneity, and dominated by fine-grained mixed sedimentary rocks (Fig. 1b). XRD (X-ray diffraction) analysis of whole rock shows that the reservoirs are mainly composed of quartz, feldspar, carbonate minerals and clay minerals, and largely clastic rock, tuff and carbonate rocks[17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. The sweet spot sections mainly include (tuff-bearing) tuffaceous dolarenite, (tuff-bearing) tuffy dolomitic sandstone, (tuff-bearing) tuffy dolomitic siltstone, (tuff-bearing) tuffaceous micrite microcrystalline algal dolomite, and (tuff-bearing) tuffaceous lithic feldspar siltstone-fine sandstone.

Analysis results of rock samples show that the Lucaogou Formation reservoirs have an overburden porosity of 6% to 16%, and overburden permeability of less than 0.1×10-3 μm2 in general, representing medium-low porosity and low-ultra low permeability and poor porosity-permeability correlation that are typical for shale reservoirs (Fig. 2). The results of cast thin section and physical property analysis of Well Ji 174 show the upper sweet spot section of the Lucaogou Formation has a porosity range from 2.25% to 18.80%, an average porosity of 11.26% (Fig. 1b), and mainly remaining intergranular pores, dissolution pores, and dolomite intercrystalline pores (Fig. 3a-3c); the lower sweet spot section has a porosity range from 1.85% to 20.60%, an average porosity of 9.85% (Fig. 1b), and mainly dissolved pores, remaining intergranular pores and dolomite intercrystalline pores (Fig. 3d). In general, the reservoirs have complex pore structure and strong heterogeneity. Pores in the reservoirs are largely in micrometer and nanometer scales, and a small amount is millimeter scale[25,26].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.   Relationship between overburden porosity and overburden permeability of reservoirs in Lucaogou Formation.


Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.   Authigenic minerals and pore characteristics of the Lucaogou Formation rocks. (a) Well Ji174, 3114.86 m, residual intergranular pore, cast thin section; (b) Well Ji 174, 3134.79 m, dolomite intercrystalline pore, cast thin section; (c) Well Ji 174, 3182.43 m, arene solution pores, cast thin section; (d) Well Ji 10025, 3560.29 m, residual intergranular and intragranular dissolution pores, cast thin section; (e) Well Ji 302, 2868.01-2868.35 m, calcite veins and lenticular bodies visible, core image; (f) Well Ji 30, 4144.30 m, fine crystalline ankerite, dyed blue; (g) Well Ji 174, 3204.10 m, growth sequence of calcite-dolomite-iron bearing dolomite, backscattered electron image; (h) Well Ji 174, 3202.30 m, analcite, cross-polarized light; (i) Well Ji 305, 3542.40 m, oil filled between grains giving off white fluorescence, fluorescence thin section.


3. Diagenesis

3.1. Alkaline diagenesis

Alkaline diagenesis refers to a series of diagenetic reactions in an alkaline diagenetic fluid environment. A large number of alkaline authigenic minerals and alkaline geochemical features suggest that the shale reservoirs in the study area experienced alkaline diagenetic environment during the diagenetic process. Influenced by the sedimentary environment and the nature of pore water, the study area is generally a diagenetic type in the background of alkaline diagenetic environment. The characteristics of alkaline diagenesis in this area mainly include quartz dissolution, carbonate cementation and metasomatism, and albite and analcime precipitation, etc.

3.1.1. Authigenic minerals in alkaline environment

3.1.1.1. Carbonate minerals

Carbonate minerals, sensitive to the pH, are likely to precipitate in slightly alkaline-alkaline environment (pH greater than 8), while likely to dissolve in acid environment[6]. Therefore, alkaline environment is a necessary condition for the precipitation and stable existence of these minerals.

Carbonate minerals in the study area mainly include calcite, dolomite, and ankerite (Figs. 3e, 3f, 4a-4c, Table 1). Carbonate metasomatism is strong in an alkaline condition, mainly manifested as calcite replacing feldspar, dolomite replacing calcite, dolomite replacing feldspar, and ankerite replacing calcite, etc. According to the mineral metasomatic relationships and mineral growth order, the crystallization order of carbonate minerals is calcite-dolomite-ankerite-iron- bearing dolomite (Fig. 3g). This phenomenon indicates that the Mg2+ and Fe2+ concentrations in the pore water experienced a cyclic process from weak to strong to weak, which proves that the alkaline environment suitable for carbonate precipitation in the study area appeared in multiple stages. Related studies have shown that the dolomite and calcite in the Lucaogou Formation are rich in Sr, and have 87Sr/86Sr very close to 87Sr/86Sr in the mantle, suggesting the formation was affected by hydrothermal fluids or volcanic materials[9, 27].

Table 1   Electron probe analysis results of minerals in the Lucaogou Formation reservoirs.

Mineral typeNa2O/%MgO/%Al2O3/%SiO2/%K2O/%CaO/%FeO/%MnO/%As2O5/%SrO/%CO2/%
Dolomite0.19418.8730.051*0.118*0.022*30.6812.4880.2510.484*0.19846.640
Ankerite0.08314.3930.036*BDL0.011*29.5568.9920.3490.353*0.18846.039
Calcite0.099*0.4900.034*0.050*0.016*55.3130.665*0.160*0.39442.779
Albite11.3880.063*19.02267.8410.3590.438*0.4450.023*0.421
Orthoclase0.9800.32617.72567.32512.1240.7720.2910.457
Microcline3.199BDL18.19766.56211.3310.1710.1190.421

Note: BDL means that the element content is below the detection limit of the instrument, * is the average value of the data after removing the elements with contents below the detection limit of the instrument, and the CO2 content was calculated by the difference method.

New window| CSV


Through temperature analysis of inclusions, the carbonate mineral inclusions have two homogenization temperature distribution intervals of 65-90 ℃ and 98-124 ℃, indicating that two stages of large-scale carbonate mineral cementation events occurred in the study area.3.1.1.2. AnalciteAnalcite is a sodium-rich silicate mineral developed in alkaline lake basins or alkaline water bodies affected by hydrothermal and volcanic substances[28]. In terms of formation environment, the conditions conducive to zeolites precipitation are high salinity alkaline medium conditions (high pH value) rich in Ca2 +, Na+, K+ ions, in addition, appropriate partial pressure by carbon dioxide is also required[6, 29]. Zeolites can’t exist stably in acidic environment, so zeolites are good indicators of alkaline sedimentary and diagenetic environment.The analcite is in grain shape under monopolarized light and fully extinct under orthogonal light (Fig. 3h). The analcite grains in the backscatter images are dark gray, and have irregular bay shape edge due to acidic dissolution, and are in point-line contact or floating stage (Fig. 4d). The results of electron probe analysis show that the analcite samples in Lucaogou Formation have Si/Al values of 2.51-2.73, and it is generally believed that the high silicon content analcite with Si/Al value of about 2.7 is generated by the reaction of siliceous volcanic glass and alkaline water[30] (Table 2). Therefore, the analcite in the study area is related to pyroclastic alteration in the early diagenetic period.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.   Acid and alkali diageneses in Lucaogou Formation. (a) Well Ji 33, 3663.21 m, calcite cement, plane-polarized light; (b) Well Ji 30, 4052.46 m, dolomite cement, orthogonal light; (c) Well Ji 41, 3917.10 m, dolomite crystal, FESEM (Field emission scanning electron microscopy); (d) Well Ji 174, 3202.30 m, dark gray analcime, gray-white ankerite, and siderite indicated by bright spot, backscattered electron image; (e) Well Ji 10012, 3176.70 m, authigenic almonite crystals, FESEM; (f) Well Ji 10025, 3491.85 m, illite/smectite mixed-layer mineral in beehive shape, FESEM; (g) Well Ji 10025, 3482.46 m, schistose illite, FESEM; (h) Well Ji 174, 3202.00 m, irregular bay dissolution at quartz particle edges, reflected light; (i) Well Ji 10025, 3462.15 m, dissolution pores in feldspar grains, FESEM.


Table 2   Electron probe analysis results of analcite in the Lucaogou Formation reservoirs.

Sample numberK2O/%CaO/%TiO2/%P2O5/%Na2O/%Al2O3/%MgO/%SiO2/%MnO/%FeO/%Total/%Si/Al
10.040.0100.036.7820.20.0165.0200.1192.192.73
20.220.03008.5420.930.04620.040.1191.912.51
30.050.010.0107.1220.8065.0400.1193.132.65
40.0200.010.028.2620.88063.4700.1992.852.58

New window| CSV


3.1.1.3. Authigenic albite

Albite is an extremely pure terminal component of plagioclase solid solution series. In the diagenetic process, the formation modes of albite mainly include: (1) albitization of feldspar clast caused by ionic metasomatism; (2) secondary growth of albite at the edge of feldspar clast; and (3) newly generated albite associated with the dissolution of feldspar clast[31]. All the three kinds of albite formation modes require alkaline diagenetic fluid environment.

Through analysis of cast thin sections and observation with scanning electron microscope, authigenic albite cement was found in every well section of the study area. Under the scanning electron microscope, the authigenic albite grains are mostly plate-shaped automorphic crystal with a clean surface and simple double crystals, and are in columnar shape vertically distributed along the edge of feldspar moldic hole (Fig. 4e). Electron probe and X-ray diffraction analysis show that the dissolved feldspars are all alkaline feldspars.

3.1.1.4. Clay minerals

Through whole rock XRD analysis of 403 samples, the shale reservoirs of the Lucaogou Formation have a low content of clay minerals on the whole (on average 12.5%). The XRD results of clay minerals show that the clay minerals of the Lucaogou Formation are mainly illite/montmorillonite mixed layer and chlorite/montmorillonite mixed layer, with relative contents of 40.3% and 27.6%, respectively. The kaolinite content is extremely low, with a relative content of only 0.5% (Fig. 5a, Table 3). The ratio of illite/montmorillonite mixed layer mainly ranges from 70% to 100%, and the ratio of chlorite/montmorillonite mixed layer is mainly 20% to 40% (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.   Clay mineral composition of Lucaogou Formation(a) and ratio of the illite/montmorillonite mixed layer(b).


Table 3   XRD analysis results of clay minerals in the Lucaogou Formation reservoirs.

WellDepth/mMontmorillonite/%Illite/mosnt-
morillonite/%
Illite/
%
Kaolinite/
%
Chlorite/
%
Chlorite/mont-
morillonite/%
Ratio of the illite/ montmorillonite/%Ratio of chlorite/ montmorillonite/%
Ji 1743128.10445670
Ji 1743141.043118640
Ji 1743197.79100100
Ji 1743206.44946100
Ji 1743267.1969319030
Ji 1743296.6110095
Ji 1743314.4695580
Ji 1743378.366187620
Ji 1743392.7728165630
Ji 2513601.06851520
Ji 2513619.6111542872030
Ji 2513629.18128830
Ji 2513631.9947292455
Ji 2513632.3523534292040
Ji 2513633.0737481540
Ji 2513744.7210060
Ji 2513770.3310060
Ji 2513878.49838995
Ji 3032592.00522961375
Ji 3032592.77631971165
Ji 3032600.32642031365
Ji 3053576.787913890
Ji 343684.591090
Ji 343781.2260274920
Ji 343811.43116162220
Ji 343811.70264072740
Ji 343812.3485112285
Ji 343813.0031537980
Ji 343815.659112640
Ji 382785.2253153290
Ji 382809.4360142645
Ji 432924.27109030
Ji 432948.2697390
Ji 432961.933611802040

New window| CSV


Authigenic kaolinite is formed under the condition of acidic medium, while montmorillonite and illite/montmorillonite minerals are clay minerals formed in alkaline medium, and are mostly altered from volcanic materials (Fig. 4f). In alkaline medium conditions, when the pore water is rich in K+, at a certain temperature, montmorillonite would transform into illite or feldspar transform directly to illite; when pore water is rich in Mg2+ and Fe2+, in alkaline medium condition, chlorite can directly precipitate, or montmorillonite can convert into chlorite through chlorite/montmorillonite layer. Illite is formed in weakly alkaline pore water rich in K+ or is transformed from other minerals during diagenesis. For example, kaolinite can gradually transform into illite in slightly alkaline or alkaline solution rich in K+. Therefore, the appearance of illite indicates the existence of weakly alkaline-alkaline environment[6] (Fig. 4g).

3.1.2. Quartz dissolution

Previous studies suggested that there is direct dissolution of silica[32]. When the pH value is less than 9, SiO2 basically does not dissolve; when the pH value is greater than 9, SiO2 begins to dissolve. Meanwhile, as the pH value increases, the solubility of SiO2 also increases accordingly. Therefore, SiO2 can only precipitate in acidic or weakly alkaline environment. Quartz dissolution indicates that there were alkaline fluids during the diagenetic process, and the reservoirs have been reformed to some extent. Through observation and analysis of reflected light rock slices and SEM, the alkaline dissolution of quartz mainly appears in irregular bay shape at edges of the particles or honeycomb shape dissolution on quartz grain surface (Fig. 4h).

3.2. Acid diagenesis

The acidic diagenesis in the study area is dominated by acidic dissolution of feldspar, associated with a small amount of carbonate dissolution. Carbonic acid and organic acids formed when organic matter matures are the main sources of acidic fluids in the study area[33]. Affected by the carbonic acid and organic acids discharged by the two stages of organic matter maturation, feldspar crystal fragments in the reservoirs are significantly dissolved. Observation of cast thin sections shows the surface or edge of feldspar crystal fragments are dissolved to various degrees to form dissolution intergranular pores, dissolution intragranular pores and moldic pores (Figs. 3d and 4i). Under the SEM, it is found the acid dissolution of feldspar mainly goes along cleavages, and there is a gradual dissolution expansion along the cleavages. Calcite usually occurs in connected crystal cement or filling of cracks in the rock, with no obvious signs of dissolution. Only in the local porphyry dolomite interval, dissolution of calcite particles has been seen.

4. Evolution of alternating diagenesis and its influence on the reservoirs

4.1. Diagenetic stage of the reservoirs

The burial depth of the Lucaogou Formation in the study area is 2500 to 4000 m, the Ro value of source rock is 0.70% to 1.30% (on average 0.78%), and the maximum peak temperature of pyrolysis Tmax is 428 ℃ to 459 ℃ (on average 440 ℃). According to the oil and gas industry standards of the People’s Republic of China[34], the shale reservoirs of the Lucaogou Formation are currently in stage A of middle diagenesis[35,36] (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.   Diagenetic stage division of reservoirs in Lucaogou Formation.


4.2. Alternating diagenetic evolution of acid and alkali

During the sedimentary period of the Lucaogou Formation, the lake water was alkaline, the average value of Sr/Ba in the reservoirs was 1.43, the average value of Ba/Ga was 7.75, the average value of Th/U was 1.61[36,37], and δ13C and δ18O in dolomite were higher and relatively stable[38,39,40]. There are three possible reasons for the alkaline sedimentary water body: (1) Volcanic activity was strong in the Junggar Basin in Permian[37], the tuff material formed had high contents of alkaline feldspar and medium-based tuff etc., these materials released Na+, K+, Mg2+, and Fe2+ during hydrolysis, leading to an alkaline depositional environment. (2) Hydrothermal activity brought about a large amount of alkaline materials. (3) The weathering and leaching of volcanic material around the basin formed alkaline cations like Mg2+ and Fe2+ which were brought into the lake by rivers around the basin.

The water nature of alkaline saline lake basin in the sedimentary period determined that the formation water in the penecontemporaneous to early diagenetic stage A was alkaline, and the main diagenetic processes include gypsum, dolomite and calcite precipitation, and feldspar and quartz alkaline dissolution. Carbonate minerals such as dolomite and calcite in the slope area of the basin have a δ13C of 6.8‰ to 9.7‰, 8.3 ‰ on average, which is higher than that of lacustrine primary carbonate rocks[41], so they are of penecontemporaneous period evaporative lacustrine facies origin affected by volcanic materials or hydrothermal fluid[42]. In addition, microbial genesis is also an important formation mechanism of dolomite in deep depressions of the basin.

From late period of early diagenesis B stage to early period of middle diagenesis A stage, affected by burial thermal effect and the thermal catalysis of tuffaceous material, organic matter reached low maturity and started to generate oil, and the CO2 and organic acids produced in association with oil generation dissolved feldspar and carbonate minerals. This stage was the period of acidic diagenesis.

In the late period of middle diagenesis A stage, as organic acids and carbonic acid dissolved feldspar and other minerals, they consumed themselves, so the pore water gradually changed from acidic to weakly alkaline and entered alkaline diagenetic environment again. The dolomite formed at this stage is burial origin and has iron-bearing characteristic. Cementation of iron-bearing dolomite and iron-bearing dolomite replacing calcite occurred. In addition, there are a series of alkaline diagenetic features such as illite precipitation and dissolution of secondary quartz overgrowth edge.

The above phenomena indicate that the shale reservoirs of Lucaogou Formation have characteristics of alternate acid and alkaline diagenetic processes, and alkaline diagenesis took dominance, and acid dissolution mainly occurred after the early diagenetic stage (Fig. 6).

4.3. Impacts on reservoir pore evolution

In addition to depositional conditions, diagenesis is also an important factor affecting reservoir physical properties and pore evolution, among which compaction, dissolution, and cementation are the three most important factors. Different from the traditional acidic diagenesis, when the main diagenetic environment is alkaline, the reservoirs generally undergo multiple alternations of the acidic and alkaline diagenetic environments, which ultimately significantly improve the physical properties of the reservoirs[6]. Affected by mineral composition, texture, different rocks have different types and sizes of pores. Based on burial history, diagenesis and their impact on pores, the pore evolution of the Lucaogou Formation reservoirs in the study area has three stages, alkaline compaction and porosity reduction-porosity increase stage, porosity increase stage by acid dissolution, and porosity increase-porosity reduction stage by alkaline dissolution (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.   Evolution of reservoir pores in the Lucaogou Formation. P2+3—Middle and Upper Permian; T—Triassic; J1— Lower Jurassic; J2+3—Middle and Upper Jurassic; K1—Lower Cretaceous; K2—Upper Cretaceous; E—Paleogene; N—Neogene; Q— Quaternary.


The alkaline compaction porosity reduction-porosity increase stage occurred in early diagenetic stage A to early diagenetic stage B from the early stage of Late Permian to Late Triassic (200-220 Ma). Based on the quantitative simulation of staged paleo-porosity evolution of reservoir diagenesis, the Lucaogou Formation sediments had an initial porosity of 50% to 55%, as subsidence went on, the Lucaogou Formation reduced to a porosity of about 20% by 200 Ma (Late Triassic) due to mechanical compaction (Fig. 7). The whole rock XRD results of Well Ji 174 in the study area show that the upper and lower sweet spot sections of the shale reservoirs in the Lucaogou Formation have higher tuff content than the intervals not in sweet spots. In the interval of tuffaceous feldspar detrital silt fine sandstone, affected by the sedimentary environment and alkaline fluid, and the quartz suffered alkaline dissolution according to equation (1). The alkaline environment is conducive to the dissolution and migration of siliceous minerals as quartz etc. and aluminosilicate minerals, and silicon and aluminum elements are transported in the form of negatively charged organic complex ions. These complex ions are stable in alkaline liquids and likely to precipitate in acidic liquids[43]. Owing to the porosity reduction caused by mechanical compaction and porosity increase caused by alkaline dissolution, the porosity is higher than the normal compaction curve (Fig. 7).

SiO2+OH-=HSiO3-

In contrast, the tuff and organic matter-bearing micritic dolomite and micritic algal dolomite intervals have fewer primary pores and well-developed intercrystalline pores. Due to the cementation of calcite in the reservoirs and the increase of dolomite crystals in the rock framework, these reservoirs have higher resistance to compaction.

The porosity increase stage by acid dissolution occurred in early Middle diageneis A stage from the early Jurassic to Early Cretaceous (100-200 Ma ago), when the Lucaogou Formation shale reservoirs further reduced in porosity to 10% (Fig. 7). The source rock of the Lucaogou Formation in the Jimsar Sag has entered the oil-generating stage (with Ro value reaching 0.5%) since the Late Triassic, and entered massive hydrocarbon generation stage in the Middle Jurassic (at Ro value of 0.7%)[44]. To the late Middle Jurassic, before the formation of liquid hydrocarbons by the source rock, oxygen-containing functional groups removed from kerogen formed water-soluble organic acids (such as formic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, and oxalic acid), and reached the peak of organic acid production. The acidic fluids in the Lucaogou Formation were mainly organic acids, followed by carbonic acid generated by dissolution of carbon dioxide from organic acids dissociation at high temperatures in water[45]. The alkaline feldspars in the tuff of the tuff-bearing feldspar detrital fine sandstone and tuff and organic matter-bearing micrite dolomite dissolved massively according to equation (2), increasing porosity. With the increase of tuff, the secondary pores become more developed.

2KAlSi3O8+2H++H2O=Al2Si2O5(OH)4+4SiO2+2K+

The porosity increase-porosity reduction stage by alkaline dissolution occurred in the middle diagenesis A stage from late Early Cretaceous (100 Ma from now) to the present, when the porosity of the tight reservoirs of the Lucaogou Formation reduced to 9%. Due to the consumption of organic acids and carbonic acid, the diagenetic environment started to change from acidic to weakly alkaline or alkaline. Under the condition of alkaline medium, iron-bearing calcite and iron-bearing dolomite precipitated in the pores, and the porosity reduced. Fine quartz particles in tuff dissolved in the alkaline environment. Tuff contained more alkaline feldspar, and the alkaline feldspar reacted with kaolinite from acid dissolution to form illite and illite/montmorillonite minerals[46]. Therefore, the reservoir rocks have characteristics of porosity increase caused by alkaline dissolution and porosity reduction caused by compaction and cementation. Now the main body of the reservoirs is in the middle diagenesis A stage, and has primarily secondary pores formed by dissolution of feldspar crystal fragments and intercrystalline pores of dolomite. The physical property analysis data shows that the reservoirs have an overall average porosity of 5% to 12% (Fig. 7).

In the alternate acid-alkali diagenetic environments, three secondary pore zones developed in the Lucaogou Formation of the study area, namely porosity reduction-porosity increase by alkaline compaction secondary pore development zone at the depth of 2415-2655 m, acidic dissolution porosity increase secondary pore development zone at 3115-3870 m depth, and alkaline dissolution porosity increase and porosity reduction secondary pore development zone at the depth of 4015 to 4280 m. But at the present stage, under stronger compaction, the reservoirs have low porosities (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.   Secondary pore development zones in Lucaogou Formation.


4.4. Impacts on reservoir physical properties

The results of cast thin section, scanning electron microscopy and high-pressure mercury intrusion experiments show that the primary intergranular pores are 1-30 µm in diameter, the intergranular dissolution pores are 10-50 µm in diameter (up to 100 µm), and the intragranular dissolved pores are 5-20 µm in diameter, and the intercrystalline pores are 100-1000 nm in diameter, and mainly found in dolomite and dolomitic siltstone (fine sandstone). The tuffaceous feldspar detrital fine sandstone contains pores largely 0.036-5.000 µm in size, with micropores, submicron pores and nanopores account for 77%, 20%, and 3% respectively. This kind of pore structure is similar to that of conventional siltstone-fine sandstone reservoirs. This kind of reservoir has higher content of anti-compacting minerals (quartz, feldspar), and mainly remaining intergranular pores and acidic dissolution pores (Figs. 9 and 10). Tuffaceous and organic matter-bearing micrite dolomite contains tuff dissolution pores and dolomite intercrystalline pores. The pores are wide in size distribution range, and dominated by submicron pores (79%). This kind of rock has higher retained hydrocarbon content[35]. The porosity characteristics of this kind of rock are the reformation results of alternate alkaline diagenesis and acid diagenesis. Alkaline dissolution improved the rock's overall resistance to compaction and enabled some primary pores to be preserved, providing channels for later acid dissolution (Figs. 9 and 10). The micritic algal dolomite has mostly intercrystalline pores of submicron scale (90%), and a small proportion of micron-scale pores (only 5%), showing a relatively poor pore structure. Compared with tuffaceous and organic matter-bearing micrite dolomite, it has fewer micron-scale dissolution pores, which is related to the low content of acidic dissolution substances in such rock and the weak reformation of acidic diagenesis (Figs. 9 and 10).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.   Mercury injection curve of Lucaogou Formation rock samples.


Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.   Pore size distribution of different lithofacies in Lucaogou Formation.


5. Prediction of diagenetic facies and favorable reservoirs

5.1. The diagenetic facies

Diagenetic facies is the core element that determines the storage performance and oil and gas enrichment of clastic reservoirs, and represents the combined effect of diagenetic environment and diagenetic minerals[7, 47]. Accurate evaluation of diagenetic facies enables effective prediction of favorable reservoirs and diagenetic traps. Researchers in China and abroad have different understandings on and divisions of diagenetic facies[7], which are mainly reflected in the connotation and naming of diagenetic facies, but most of them involve diagenetic processes and their products. According to the idea of combining the source rock type and the dominant pore type, the diagenetic facies of the Lucaogou Formation shale reservoirs is divided into tuffaceous residual intergranular pore-dissolution pore facies, tuffaceous and organic matter-bearing micrite dolomite mixed pore facies, and micrite algal dolomite intercrystalline pore facies. Affected by differences in lithology, different lithofacies in the study area exhibit different diagenetic characteristics.

5.1.1. Tuffaceous residual intergranular pore and dissolution pore facies

The silt-fine sandstone samples with higher tuff content have higher contents of alkaline feldspar and quartz crystal debris, and are mainly mud-fine silt-sand grade in granularity. These descending volcanic materials were carried into the lake basin by gravity or wind[48]. Experiencing less transport and grinding, the crystal debris is mostly in sharp angular shape, and in particle-supported, point-line and line contact. The main pore types in this facies are residual intergranular pore, intergranular dissolved pore, feldspar intragranular pore and tuff dissolved pore. The remaining intergranular pores are mostly triangular and quadrilateral, with uniform size and distribution (Fig. 11a, 11b).

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11.   Lithofacies characteristics of shale reservoirs in the Lucaogou Formation. (a) Well Ji 174, 3114.00 m, tuffaceous remaining intergranular pore-dissolution pore facies, plane-polarized light; (b) Well Ji 174, 3121.58 m, residual intergranular pore, plane-polarized light; (c) Well Ji 251, 3130.76 m, intragranular dissolution pores in feldspar grains, SEM; (d) Well Ji 30, 4054.76 m, tuffaceous and organic matter-bearing micritic dolomite mixed pore facies, gray-white and gray-black are tuff clasts, orthogonal light; (e) Well Ji 41, 3917.10 m, dolomite intercrystalline pores and throats, SEM; (f) Well Ji 41, 3917.10 m, organic matter pores, SEM; (g) Well Ji 174, 3227.51 m, micritic algal dolomite intercrystalline pore facies, fluorescence slice; (h) Well Ji 174, 3269.74 m, micro/nano pores, argon ion polishing+FESEM; (i) Well Ji 174, 3143.66 m, nanopores and oil film on pore wall, argon ion polishing+FESEM.


Diagenesis occurred under the condition of alkaline media, and both quartz and feldspar crystal fragments suffered dissolution, resulting in irregular bay-shaped edges of quartz and feldspar crystal fragment in the reservoirs, and a large number of secondary dissolution pores which provides storage space for oil (Fig. 3i). In the early alkaline diagenetic environment, alkali feldspar and quartz were dissolved to various degrees, increasing the pore volume. In the late alkaline diagenetic environment, the oil generated entered into the remaining intergranular pores, inhibiting mechanical compaction and protecting the reservoir pores. During diagenesis in acidic medium, the pH of reservoir fluid was controlled by organic acids, and feldspar crystal fragments and tuff were dissolved to various degrees (Fig. 11c). This diagenetic facies is constructive diagenetic facies influenced by acid and alkali dissolutions.

5.1.2. Tuffaceous and organic matter-bearing micritic dolomite mixed pore facies

This type of diagenetic facies is characterized by the mixing of tuff and organic micrite dolomite in different proportions, including tuffy micrite dolomite and tuffaceous micrite dolomite (Fig. 11d). This kind of diagenetic facies has oil generation mechanism different from the traditional model, when the tuff material mixes with dolomitic rock containing organic matter, the trace elements in the tuff has catalytic effect to hydrocarbon generation of source rock, among which, radioactive elements with high heat flow values, like U, Th, K make the formation temperature rise, and thus promoting the thermal evolution of hydrocarbon source rock[49]. Clearly, tuff material played an important role in facilitating the maturity of organic matter[9]. The sections in Lucaogou Formation with higher contents of volcanic material have Ro values of above 0.8% and Tmax values of above 440 °C, reaching the limit of oil and gas maturity. In contrast, the horizons with lower contents of volcanic material have Ro and Tmax values not reaching the standard of source rock maturity. In addition, the horizons with higher volcanic material content have an average value of C29ααα20S/(S+R) of 0.49, and average C29αββ/(ααα+ αββ) value of 0.32, which also reflect that the organic matter has reached maturity. Therefore, under the thermal catalysis of volcanic activity, the early diagenetic organic matter could enter a low-maturity period. The formation of organic acids led to the dissolution of crystal fragments and the increase of secondary pores. The generated oil and gas are not only stored in intergranular pores and dissolved pores, but also intercrystalline pores rich in dolomite itself. There are many intergranular pores and organic matter pores observed in the micrite dolomite under SEM (Fig. 11e, 11f).

In this type of diagenetic facies, there is a kind of micrite dolomite-microbial dolomite with high oil content[50,51]. The dolomite has largely micro-nano-scale intercrystalline pores, a porosity range of 3.89%-8.26%, and a permeability range of (0.101 2-0.371 9)×10-3 μm2. Although poor in physical properties, these rocks are widely distributed laterally and vertically, and uniform in lithology, so they have good oiliness. There are "bay-like" decomposition and oil generation characteristics at the edge of organic matter. The oil appears in thin film at the edge of intercrystalline pores or filling in pores, so this kind of rock is a set of effective reservoirs with self-generation and self-storage characteristics.

5.1.3. Micritic algal dolomite intercrystalline pore facies

Under the condition of early alkaline medium, the algal bloomed in the saline lake basin under the influence of hydrothermal fluid and tuff, providing conditions for mass production and deposition of organic matter. The brine in the bottom layer of the lake basin was isolated from air, providing ideal preservation conditions for organic matter.

The micrite algal dolomite intergranular pore facies is distributed in deep lake facies and is the main source rock type in the basin[51], in which organic pores, laminar algal layers and fractures are the main media for in-situ hydrocarbon expulsion and accumulation (Fig. 11g). It has mainly dolomite intercrystalline pores, and tight rocks. Although poorest in physical properties in the study area, it has fairly good oil-bearing property and self-generation and self-storage characteristic (Fig. 11h, 11i).

Most of the source-reservoir reservoirs in the study area belong to the tuffaceous and organic matter-bearing micritic dolomite mixed pore facies, followed by micritic algal dolomite intercrystalline pore facies. Due to the development and preservation requirements of large amounts of organic matter, the tuffaceous and organic matter-bearing micritic dolomite mixed pore facies and micritic algal dolomite intercrystalline pore facies are mostly distributed in the semi-deep lake-deep lake facies with high basic tuff content. Due to the frequent periodic rise and fall of the lake level, the relatively coarse- grained lithofacies, such as the tuffaceous remaining intergranular pore-dissolution pore facies, is widely distributed in the sedimentary lake basin.

5.2. Prediction of favorable reservoirs

The distribution of diagenetic facies has control effect on pore structure, and is of great guiding significance for the reservoir development. The upper and lower oil-bearing sections have higher contents of tuff, microbial dolomite and laminar algal than the non-oil-bearing sections, and better mixing degree of tuff and microbial dolomite than the non-oil-bearing sections. The upper and lower oil-bearing layers have better physical properties and higher oil content than the non-oil-bearing layers. Moreover, statistical results show that there is a positive correlation between tuff content and dissolution.

Taking Well Ji 174 as an example, the layers with oil saturation greater than 50% are mostly concentrated in the upper and lower oil-bearing sections, and come largely in tuffaceous remaining intergranular-dissolution pore facies and tuffaceous and organic matter-bearing micritic dolomite mixed pore facies. These two types of diagenetic facies mostly occur in the upper and lower oil layers with higher tuff content with interstratified pattern vertically.

The Lucaogou Formation is saline lake facies sediment, with two cycles in lithology. The upper and lower sweet spot sections correspond to two salinization peaks of the lake basin. From the lower sweet spot section to the upper sweet spot section, the lake basin turned closed, shallower in water body, and higher in salinity. On the plane, the tuffaceous remaining intergranular pore-dissolution pore facies in the second member of the Lucaogou Formation is distributed in the southern and middle parts of the sag, and is the main type of lithofacies in the upper sweet spot section. Wells encountering tuffaceous remaining intergranular pore-dissolution pore facies have good oil test results. For example, Well Ji 172-H had a daily oil production of 56.32 t after 15-stages of fracturing in formation testing. The tuffaceous and organic matter-bearing micritic dolomite mixed pore facies is distributed in the eastern part of the sag. Well Ji 23 drilling into this facies had a production capacity of 0.24 t/d after acid fracturing (Fig. 12a). The first member of Lucaogou Formation is composed of shallow lacustrine facies, shallow lacustrine facies with semi-deep lacustrine facies and semi-deep lacustrine facies sediments. The main body of this member is tuffaceous remaining pore-dissolution pore facies. Well Ji 36-H encountering this facies had an oil production of 20.2 t/d after 20-stage fracturing (Fig. 12b). The micritic algal dolomite intercrystalline pore facies in the first and second members of Lucaogou Formation are mainly distributed near Well Ji 174, which is deep lacustrine deposit with low oil production.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12.   Planar distribution of lithofacies of upper sweet spot section (a) and lower “sweet spot section” (the first member) of Lucaogou Formation (b).


Overall, the tuffaceous remaining intergranular pore-dissolved pore facies and tuffaceous and organic matter-bearing micritic dolomite (or microbial dolomite) mixed pore facies are the diagenetic facies with the best porosity-permeability correlation in the study area. With low saturation median pressure and high oil recovery efficiency, they are favorable diagenetic facies of the Lucaogou Formation.

6. Conclusions

The Permian Lucaogou Formation reservoirs in the Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin have mainly primary intergranular pores, alkaline dissolution pores, and acid dissolution pores. The tuffaceous remaining intergranular pore-dissolution pore facies has mainly primary intergranular pores and acid and alkali dissolution pores. The tuffaceous and organic matter-bearing micritic dolomite mixed pore facies contains pores from acid dissolutions and dolomite intercrystalline pores from an alkaline environment. The micrite algal dolomite intercrystalline pore facies contains dominantly dolomite intergranular pores formed in an alkaline environment.

The pore evolution of the shale reservoirs is comprehensively controlled by mechanical compaction and alternate acid-alkali diagenesis, and has experienced three stages, alkaline compaction porosity reduction-porosity increase stage, acid dissolution porosity increase stage and alkaline dissolution porosity increase-porosity reduction stage. There are three secondary pore development zones in the reservoirs: alkaline compaction porosity reduction-porosity increase secondary pore development zone at 2500 m; acid dissolution porosity increase secondary pore development zone at 3250- 3750 m; and alkaline dissolution porosity increase-porosity reduction secondary pore development zone at 4100-4200 m.

The tuffaceous remaining intergranular pore-dissolution pore facies features wide distribution and good pore structure, and the tuffaceous and organic matter-bearing micritic dolomite mixed pore facies has the characteristics of higher contents of oil and dissolution pore, so they are favorable diagenetic facies for "sweet spots".

Reference

ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, BAI Bin, et al.

Significance, geologic characteristics, resource potential and future challenges of tight oil and shale oil. Bulletin of Mineralogy,

Petrology and Geochemistry, 2015,43(1):3-17.

[Cited within: 1]

QIU Longwei, JIANG Zaixing, CAO Yingchang, et al.

Alkaline diagenesis and its influence on a reservoir in the Biyang depression

SCIENCE CHINA Earth Sciences, 2002,45(7):643-653.

DOI:10.1360/02yd9065      URL     [Cited within: 1]

TESTER J W, WORLEY W G, ROBINSON A B, et al.

Correlating quartz dissoluiton kinetics in pure water from 25 to 625 °C

Geochim Cosmochim Aeta, 1994,58(11):2407-2420.

[Cited within: 1]

BLOCH S, LANDER R H, BONNELL L.

Anomalously high porosity and permeability in deeply buried sandstone reservoirs: Origin and predictability

AAPG Bulletin, 2002,86(2):301-328.

[Cited within: 1]

CUADROS J.

Modeling of smectite illitization in burial diagenesis environments

Geochimica, 2006,70(16):4181-4195.

[Cited within: 1]

ZHAI Yaruo, MI Dongzhe, ZHAI Jing, et al.

Review of alkaline diagenesis in clastic reservoirs

Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2014,11(31):85-88.

[Cited within: 5]

ZHANG Jinliang, ZHANG Penghui, XIE Jun, et al.

Diagenesis of clastic reservoirs: Advances and prospects

Advances in Earth Science, 2013,28(9):957-967.

[Cited within: 4]

ZHOU Dingwu, LIU Yiqun, XING Xiujuan, et al.

Formation of the Permian basalts and implications of geochemical tracing for paleo-tectonic setting and regional tectonic background in the Turpan-Hami and Santanghu basins, Xinjiang

SCIENCE CHINA Earth Sciences, 2006,49(6):584-596.

[Cited within: 1]

JIANG Yiqin, LIU Yiqun, YANG Zhao, et al.

Characteristics and origin of tuff-type tight oil in Jimusar Depression, Junggar Basin, NW China

Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015,42(6):741-749.

[Cited within: 3]

RUSK B G, LOWERS H A, REED M H.

Trace elements in hydrothermal quartz: Relationships to cathodoluminescent textures and insights into vein formation

Geology, 2008,36(7):547-550.

[Cited within: 1]

ZHANG Shaomin, CAO Yingchang, ZHU Rukai, et al.

Lithofacies, classification of fine-grained mixed sedimentary rocks in the Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

Earth Science Frontiers, 2018,25(4):198-209.

[Cited within: 1]

MA Ke, HOU Jiagen, LIU Yuming, et al.

The sedimentary model of saline lacustrine mixed sedimentation in Permian Lucaogou, Formation, Jimsar Sag

Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017,38(6):636-648.

[Cited within: 1]

XI Kelai, CAO Yingchang, ZHU Rukai, et al.

Rock types and characteristics of tight oil reservoir in Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag

Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015,36(12):1495-1507.

[Cited within: 1]

KUANG Lichun, HU Wenxuan, WANG Xulong, et al.

Research of the tight oil reservoir in the Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag: Analysis of lithology and porosity characteristics

Geological Journal of China Universities, 2013,19(3):529-535.

[Cited within: 1]

SHI Ji’an, ZOU Niuniu, LU Xinchuan, et al.

Geochemical characteristics and genetic mechanism of Permian dolomitic clastic rocks in northwestern Junggar Basin

Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2013,31(5):898-906.

[Cited within: 1]

WANG Shuangshuang, LIU Yiqun, ZHOU Dingwu, et al.

Petrography and mineralogy of Permian magmatic rocks in the Santanghu area, Xinjiang. Bulletin of Mineralogy,

Petrology and Geochemistry, 2013,32(3):354-363.

[Cited within: 1]

JIA Chengzao, ZOU Caineng, LI Jianzhong, et al.

Assessment criteria, main types, basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China

Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012,33(3):343-350.

[Cited within: 1]

KUANG Lichun, TANG Yong, LEI Dewen, et al.

Formation conditions and exploration potential of tight oil in the Permian saline lacustrine dolomitic rock, Junggar Basin, NW China

Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012,39(6):657-667.

[Cited within: 1]

FANG Shihu, SONG Yan, XU Huaimin, et al.

Relationship between tectonic evolution and petroleum system formation: Taking the Jimsar Sag of eastern Junggar Basin as example

Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2007,29(2):149-153.

[Cited within: 1]

GAO Gang, XIANG Baoli, WANG Xuan, et al.

Stylolite occurrence and organic matter enrichment of the mixed sediments in the Lucaogou Formation of the Jimusaer Sag in Junggar Basin

Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016,27(11):1963-1969.

[Cited within: 1]

FANG Shihu, XU Huaimin, SONG Yan, et al.

Characteristics and evolution of the composite petroleum system in Jimsar Depression, eastern Junggar Basin

Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2005,26(3):259-264.

[Cited within: 1]

GAO Zhiliang, KANG Yongshang, LIU Renhe, et al.

Geological features and developmental contrilling factors of Lucaogou oil shale in the south margin of Junngar Basin

Xinjiang Geology, 2011,29(2):189-193.

[Cited within: 1]

ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, YANG Zhifeng, et al.

Geological characteristics and accumulation mechanism of continental shale oil in Jimusaer Sag, Junggar Basin

Oil & Gas Geology, 2019,40(3):524-534.

[Cited within: 1]

SI Chunsong, CHEN Nenggui, YU Chaofeng, et al.

Sedimentary characteristics of tight oil reservoir in Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag

Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013,35(5):528-533.

[Cited within: 1]

LI Min, WANG Hao, CHEN Meng.

Distribution characteristics and influecing factors of movable fluid in tight sandstone reservoirs: A case study of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, NW China

Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018,30(1):140-149.

[Cited within: 1]

JIN Jun, YANG Zhao, YILIHAMU , et al.

Nanopore characteristics and oil-bearing properties of tight oil reservoirs in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

Earth Science, 2018,43(5):1594-1601.

[Cited within: 1]

LIU Yiqun, JIAO Xin, LI Hong, et al.

Primary dolostone formation related to mantle-originated exhalative hydrothermal activities, Permian Yuejingou section, Santanghu area, Xinjiang, NW China

SCIENCE CHINA Earth Sciences, 2012,55(2):183-192.

DOI:10.1007/s11430-011-4356-1      URL     [Cited within: 1]

ZHANG Yue, CHEN Shiyue, MWNG Qing’ai, et al.

The discovery of analcite in fine-grained sedimentary rocks of the second member of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag, Huanghua Depression: Implications for early digenetic environment

China Petroleum Exploration, 2015,20(4):37-43.

[Cited within: 1]

EVANS J.

Quartz dissolution during shale diagenesis implications for quartz cementation sandstones

Chemical Geology, 1990,84(1):239-240.

DOI:10.1016/0009-2541(90)90224-U      URL     [Cited within: 1]

HAN Shouhua, YU Hezhong, SI Chunsong, et al.

Corrosion of analcite in reservoir of Junggar Basin

Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007,28(3):51-62.

[Cited within: 1]

YANG Guifang, ZHUO Shengguang, NIU Ben, et al.

AIbitization of detrital felds in cretaceous sandstones from the Songliao Basin

Geological Review, 2003,49(2):155-161.

URL     [Cited within: 1]

The main types of clastic sandstones are feldspathic litharenite and lithic arkose in the Cretaceous of the Songliao basin. There are many unstable components containing detrital feldspar, lithic fragments and so on. Content of potash feldspar decreases with increasing burial depth increases (increasing diagenesis) and gradually disappears below a depth of 2700 m in detrital feldspar of sandstone. The albite component increases while anorthic component decreases in detrital plagioclase. The plagioclase turned into an end - member component of albite. In the diagenic process, three types of albitization are determined; (1) albitization of metasomatism by means of cation exchange in detrital feldspar; (2) secondary growth of albite on the original detrital feldspar; (3) albite crystallization with detrital feldspar solution. Analysis based on the equilibrium activity of thermodynamic principle shows that albitization of plagioclase is not controlled by temperature and pressure in diagenesis, and that albitization of potash feldspar depends on the increase of temperature and pressure during a diagenetic process. Therefore, the albitization of plagioclase is shown in the early stage of diagenesis and albitization of potash feldspar appears only in the late stage of diagenesis.

QIU Longwei, JIANG Zaixing, CHEN Wenxue, et al.

A new type of secondary porosity quartz dissolution porosity

Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002,20(4):621-627.

URL     [Cited within: 1]

As one of the most stable petrogenetic minerals in clastic reservoir, quartz isgenerally considered to be indissoluble to directly form secondary porosity during diagenesis, and the dissolved rim of quartz in reservoir has been thought to be the result of dissolution of cements that substituted quartz formerly. In this study, quartz was found to have been dissolved directly in the reservoir of Hetaoyuan formation in Biyang depression, and form a new genetic type of porosity, i. e. quartz dissolution porosity, which is one of the most important porosity types in reservoir in the studied area. The dissolution of quartz reaches 2%~ 7%, and sometimes up to more than 8 %of microscopic porosity in the reservoir rock,, which accounts for 10%~ 35 %of total porosity.Several lines of microscopic evidence for quartz dissolution are listed as follows:( 1)Partial dissolution of clastic quartz. Quartz was dissolved partially to form irregularly rim, isolated grains, intercrystalline pores, sometimes quartz grains can be dissolved partly, and even completely, and result in the for-mation of stretched pores. ( 2)Dissolution of quartz develops along contact seam, the opening of contact seams can form irregular pore throat, which couldnot be the result of dissolution of quartz substituting cements. ( 3)Partial dissolution of quartzose detritus, the erosion of the detritusis obvious, and sometimesit can form honeycombed mi-cropores. ( 4)Shape of carbonate components, both carbonate cements and debritus do not show much dissolution in reservoir rocks of the studied area, however, adjacent quartz grains were dissolved obviously, this further reveals that quartz was dissolved directly.Quartz dissolution in the studied area is the result of sedimentary environment, diagenesis, and evolution of formation water. Biyang depression was an arid to semi-arid subtropical enclosed fault-trough lake during deposi-tion, and the depositional environment of which was an alkaline lake. The original formation water of the reservoir was alkaline to strong alkaline. As a result, together with the influence of alkaline strata, formation water remains its alkalinity mostly during the stages of burial diagenesis. Under such environment, quartz was unstable and easily dissolved. However, early diagenetic stage B is the most important formation period of quartz dissolution and such genetic type of porosity.The existence of aboundant quartz dissolution pores provides new possibility for the interpretation of quartz dissolution itself, SiO 2 cement, secondary porosity formation, as well as for reservoir prediction and evaluation in clastic reservoir.

YOU Jun, ZHEN Junmao.

Factors of affecting the reservoir physical properties of deep strata in the Huanghua Depression

Geoscience, 1999,13(3):350-354.

[Cited within: 1]

State Economic and Trade Commission. The division of diagenetic stages in clastic rocks: SY/T 5477—2003. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2003.

[Cited within: 1]

JI Hongjie, QIU Zhen, TAO Huifei, et al.

Source rock characteristics and hydrocarbon generation kinetics: A case study of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag, Junggar Basin

Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016,28(4):34-42.

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2016.04.005      URL     [Cited within: 2]

There are abundant petroleum resources in the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag, Junggar Basin. The source rock types of the Lucaogou Formation include shale, carbonate shale and silty mudstone. These source rocks are characterized by high organic carbon content, high hydrocarbon generation potential, low maturity to maturity and Ⅰ-Ⅱ type kerogen. Based on conventional organic geochemistry evaluation of the source rocks, the
source rock samples with low?middle maturity and high organic carbon content were selected to carry out pyrolysis and hydrocarbon generation kinetics simulation experiments under open system, and the characteristics of the hydrocarbon generation and expulsion were studied. The results show that the reaction activation energy of the source rocks is 210 kJ/mol. The hydrocarbon generation and expulsion characteristics of the three kinds of source rocks are
different. The shale has the highest hydrocarbon generation content and hydrocarbon expulsion rate, followed by carbonate shale, and the silty mudstone has the lowest hydrocarbon generation content and hydrocarbon expulsion rate. It is considered that the main driving force of the hydrocarbon expulsion and tight oil accumulation is the pressure increased by the hydrocarbon generation of source rocks in the Lucaogou Formation, and the shale and carbonate shale are the favorable targets for tight oil exploration.

WANG Jian, LI Erting, CHEN Jun, et al.

Characteristics and hydrocarbon generation mechanism of high-quality source rocks in Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

Geological Review, 2020,66(3):755-763.

[Cited within: 2]

MENG Yuanlin, ZHU Hengdong, LI Xinning, et al.

Thermodynamic analyses of dolomite dissolution and prediction of the secondary porosity zones: A case study of tight tuffaceous dolomites of the second member, Permian Lucaogou Formation reservoir, Santanghu Basin, NW China

Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014,41(6):690-696.

[Cited within: 2]

ZHNAG Yaqi, MA Shizhong, GAO Yang, et al.

Depositional facies analysis on tight reservoir of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017,35(2):358-370.

[Cited within: 1]

XU Lin, CHANG Qiusheng, YANG Chengke, et al.

Characteristics and oil-bearing capability of shale oil reservoir in the Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimusaer Sag

Oil & Gas Geology, 2019,40(3):535-549.

[Cited within: 1]

HU Wenxuan, WU Haiguang, WANG Xiaolin.

Study on lithology and pore characteristics of tight oil reservoirs of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar sag Junggar Basin

Geological Journal of China Universities, 2013,19(S1):542-543.

[Cited within: 1]

QU Changsheng, QIU Longwei, YANG Yongqiang, et al.

Environmental response of the Permian volcanism in Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin, Northwest China

Seismology and Geology, 2019,41(3):789-802.

[Cited within: 1]

QU Changsheng, QIU Longwei, CAO Yingchang, et al.

Organic petrology characteristics and occurrence of source rocks in Permian Lucaogou Formation, Jimsar sag

Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2017,41(2):30-38.

[Cited within: 1]

TIAN Xiahe, QU Hongjun, LIU Xinshe, et al.

Discussion on quartz dissolution and its mechanisms of the Upper Paleozoic tight gas reservoirs in the eastern Ordos Basin

Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016,27(11):2005-2012.

DOI:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.11.2005      URL     [Cited within: 1]

The Upper Paleozoic tight gas reservoirs in the eastern Ordos Basin are mainly composed of lithic quartz sandstones and quartz sandstones,with overall high quartz content.Quartz dissolution characteristics and its formation mechanism are studied via casting thin sections,scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analyzing test data in detail.Quartz dissolution manifest as quartz particles and siliceous cement dissolved into the harbor,serrated outlines,with corrosion pits in part of some particle surfaces.Quartz dissolution has mainly three patterns,including dissolution of the edge of the quartz grains,along quartz overgrowth boundary and in part of quartz particles or in the whole quartz particles.Associated cements characteristics of quartz dissolution has mainly two patterns,i.e.,one is more acidic kaolinite clay mineral associated and another is illite-rich associated.Quartz dissolution mechanisms mainly have two types,i.e.,one is acidic pore waters and Al3+ under an organic acidic background with dissolution of quartz,associated with kaolinite-based acidic clay minerals,which improved reservoirs pores of Benxi group and Shan 2 members,while the other is alkaline pore waters under alkaline diagenesis background with dissolution of quartz,mainly associated with illite-based alkaline or neutral clay minerals,which significantly improved reservoir pores of Taiyuan group.

ZHENG Min, LI Jianzhong, WANG Wenguang, et al.

Analysis of oil charging and accumulation processes in tight reservoir beds: A case study of Lucaogu Formation in Jimsar Sag of Junggar Basin, NW China

Earth Science, 2018,43(10):3719-3732.

[Cited within: 1]

YAN Lin, RAN Qiquan, GAO Yang, et al.

Characteristics and formation mechanism of dissolved pores in tight oil reservoirs of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag

Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017,29(3):27-33.

[Cited within: 1]

HUANG Sijing, HUANG Keke, FENG Wenli, et al.

Mass exchanges among feldspar, kaolinite and illite and their influences on secondary porosity formation in clastic diagenesis: A case study on the Upper Paleozoic, Ordos Basin and Xujiahe Formation, Western Sichuan Depression

Geochimica, 2009,38(5):498-506.

[Cited within: 1]

ZOU Caineng, TAO Shizhen, ZHOU Hui, et al.

Genesis, classification and evaluation method of diagenetic facies

Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008,35(5):526-540.

DOI:10.1016/S1876-3804(09)60086-0      URL     [Cited within: 1]

Abstract

Based on the controlling of diagenesis and diagenetic facies on reservoir development, this article discusses the formation, classification, and evaluation of diagenetic facies and its application and significance in petroleum exploration. For constructive diagenetic facies such as clastic rock, carbonate rock, and igneous rock, eight kinds of genetic mechanisms are developed, including dissolution of organic acid, dolomitization, and so on. Nine constructive diagenetic facies and seven destructive diagenetic facies are classified. A naming scheme for diagenetic facies is proposed reflecting lithology, diagenesis, porosity, and permeability, that is, “porosity and permeability level + rock type + diagenesis type”. Diagenetic facies are evaluated synthetically and quantitatively on the basis of sedimentary facies, log facies, seismic facies, rock cores, and thin sections, and “four steps” and “superposition of three charts” are put forward as the methods of evaluation and mapping. Favored reservoirs, “sweet spots”, and lithostratigraphic traps can be predicted according to the distribution of different types of diagenetic facies. The development of the study on diagenetic facies is also discussed in the article.

SHAO Yu, YANG Yongqiang, WAN Min, et al.

Sedimentary characteristic and facies evolution of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin

Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2015,36(6):635-641.

[Cited within: 1]

JIN Qiang, WAN Congli, ZHOU Fangxi.

Migration of trace elements from basalts to oil source rocks and its geological significance in Minqiao area of Jinhu Depression

Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2006,30(3):1-5.

[Cited within: 1]

YOU Xuelian, SUN Shu, ZHU Jingquan, et al.

Progress in the study of microbial dolomite model

Earth Science Frontiers, 2011,18(4):52-64.

[Cited within: 1]

LI Hong, LIU Yiqun, LI Wenhou, et al.

The microbial precipitation of lacustrine dolomite from Permian Formation, Urumchi, Xinjiang, China

Geological Bulletin of China, 2013,32(4):661-670.

[Cited within: 2]

/