Petroleum Exploration and Development >
Quantitative prediction of oil saturation of unconsolidated sandstone reservoir based on time-lapse seismic “relative difference method”: Taking Zeta oil field in West Africa as an example
Received date: 2018-06-27
Revised date: 2018-12-26
Online published: 2019-04-29
Supported by
the China National Science and Technology Major Project(2017ZX05005-001)
In view of the disadvantage that the absolute difference of time-lapse seismic (the difference between monitoring data and base data) is not only related to the change of oil saturation, but also closely related to the thickness of reservoir, a time-lapse seismic "relative difference method" (the ratio of monitoring data to base data) not affected by the thickness of reservoir but only related to the change of fluid saturation, is proposed through seismic forward modeling after fluid displacement simulation. Given the same change of fluid saturation, the absolute difference of time-lapse seismic conforms to the law of “tuning effect” and seismic reflection of “thin bed”, and the remaining oil prediction method based on absolute difference of time-lapse seismic is only applicable to the reservoirs with uniform thickness smaller than the tuning thickness or with thickness greater than the tuning thickness. The relative difference of time-lapse seismic is not affected by reservoir thickness, but only related to the change of fluid saturation. It is applicable to all the deep-sea unconsolidated sandstone reservoirs which can exclude the effect of pressure, temperature, pore type and porosity on seismic. Therefore, the relation between the relative difference of time-lapse seismic and the change of fluid saturation, which is obtained from seismic forward modeling after Gassmann fluid displacement simulation, can be used to quantitatively predict the change of reservoir water saturation and then the distribution of the remaining oil. The application of this method in deep sea Zeta oil field in west Africa shows that it is reasonable and effective.
Hongmei LU , Hai XU , Yujin WO , Ning GU . Quantitative prediction of oil saturation of unconsolidated sandstone reservoir based on time-lapse seismic “relative difference method”: Taking Zeta oil field in West Africa as an example[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019 , 46(2) : 426 -434 . DOI: 10.1016/S1876-3804(19)60023-6
| [1] | WANG Zhijing . Fundamentals of seismic rock physics. Geophysics, 2001,66(2):398-412. |
| [2] | SUN Desheng, LING Yun, XIA Zhu , et al. Methodology and application of 3.5D seismic exploration. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2010,49(5):460-471. |
| [3] | LI Jingye . Time-lapse seismic interpretation on inversed impedance data of thin inter-layer reservoir. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2012,47(3):442-451. |
| [4] | WU Yiming, LING Yun, ZHANG Yongjiang , et al. Towed streamer time-lapse seismic survey design: A case study. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2016,51(1):1-12. |
| [5] | XUE Dongchuan, ZHU Zhenyu, WANG Xiaoliu . A receiver motion correction method for streamer data. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2017,52(1):1-7. |
| [6] | ROGGERO F, LERAT O, DING D Y , et al. History matching of production and 4D seismic data: Application to the Girassol field, offshore Angola. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 2012,67(2):237-262. |
| [7] | HUANG Y, MACBETH C, BARKVED O , et al. Enhanced dynamic interpretation from correlating well activity to frequently acquired 4D seismic signatures. Leading Edge, 2011,30(9):1042-1050. |
| [8] | GAINSKI M, MACGREGOR A G, FREEMAN P J , et al. Turbidite reservoir compartmentalization and well targeting with 4D seismic and production data: Schiehallion Field, UK. Geological Society London Special Publications. 2010,347(1):89-102. |
| [9] | ALVAREZ E, MACBETH C, BRAIN J . Quantifying remaining oil saturation using time-lapse seismic amplitude changes at fluid contacts. Petroleum Geoscience, 2017,23(2):238-250. |
| [10] | BAO Xiangsheng, ZHANG Jinmiao, YIN Cheng , et al. Relationship between the difference in average energy of time- lapse and the change of reservoir velocity. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2008,47(1):24-29. |
| [11] | ZHANG Huilai, FAN Tingen, HU Guangyi , et al. Time-lapse seismic matching inversion in water flooding reservoir: A case of deep-water fan in the Oilfield A, West Africa. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2015,50(3):530-535, 564. |
| [12] | DANAEI S, HERMANA M, GHOSH D P . 4D seismic qualitative interpretation for water injection monitoring: Case study in Southeast Asia. Offshore Technology Conference Asia, 2018. |
| [13] | ZHOU Shuisheng, ZHANG Bo, WU Xiangyang . Research on fluid substitution method and its application. Progress in Geophysics, 2009,24(5):1660-1664. |
| [14] | AVSETH P, MUKERJI T, MAVKO G . Quantitative seismic interpretation. London: Cambridge University, 2005. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |