Introduction
1. Regional geologic setting and overview of exploration and production
1.1. Regional geologic setting
Fig. 1. (a) Regional structural location of the Cangdong sag and (b) generalized sequence stratigraphic column. LST—lowstand systems tract; EST—expansion systems tract; HST—high systems tract. |
1.2. Overview of exploration and production in lacustrine shale oil
2. Theories and technologies of lacustrine shale oil enrichment and high production
2.1. Shale oil enrichment theories
2.1.1. High-graded shales with “three highs and one low” as the material basis of shale oil enrichment
Fig. 2. Reservoir space types in Kong 2 shales, the Cangdong sag. (a) Well GX12X1, 2 568.86 m, SEM, felsic shales, organic matter-hosted pores; (b) Well GX12X1, 2 571.21 m, SEM, felsic shales, shrinkage fractures at organic matter margin; (c) Well G19-25, 3 380.07 m, SEM, hybrid shales, grain marginal fractures and intercrystalline pores; (d) Well G108-8, 2 977.18 m, SEM,calcareous limy shales, dissolved pores; (e) Well G19-25, 3 361.26 m, SEM, calcareous limy shales, intercrystalline pores; (f) Well G108-8, 2 978.83 m, SEM, hybrid shales, microfractures; (g) Well GX12X1, 2 567.96 m, SEM, calcareous limy shales, intergranular pores; (h) Well G108-8, 2 980.32-2 980.40 m, core, calcareous limy shales, abnormal pressure-induced fractures; (i) Well G108-8, 3 170.23-3 170.32 m, core, felsic shales, bedding fissures. |
Fig. 3. Laminae and oil-bearing properties of Kong 2 shales, the Cangdong sag. (a) Well G19-25, 3 367.63-3 367.93 m, felsic laminae with yellowish white moderately bright light, core fluorescence scanning image; (b) Well G19-25, 3 355.95 m, felsic shales, felsic laminae with bluish white moderately bright light, fluorescence; (c) Well G108-8, 3 109.86 m, felsic shales, white moderately bright fluorescence, mainly oily bitumen gathering in laminae, fluorescence; (d) Well G108-8, 3 210.03 m, white bright fluorescence, gathering in laminae, fluorescence. |
2.1.2. Moderate to high thermal evolution favorable for shale oil enrichment
Fig. 4. Relation between Ro and average daily oil production converted into oil output from a horizontal section of 1000 m long after production for 180 d. |
2.1.3. Laminated felsic shales as the best enriched intervals of lacustrine shale-type shale oil
2.2. Sweet spotting technologies
2.2.1. Evaluation of shale oil enrichment layers
Table 1. Evaluation parameters and criteria of shale-type shale oil enriched intervals and drilling targets (modified from reference [26]) |
| Evaluated object | Source property | Oil-bearing property | Fracturability | Reservoir property | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOC/% | Ro/% | Continuous shale thickness/m | S1/(mg·g-1) | OSI/(mg·g-1) | Brittleness index/% | Porosity/% | |
| Enrichment layer | >2 | 0.7-1.2 | >10 | >2 | >100 | >50 | >3 |
| Drilling target | 2-4 | 0.7-1.2 | >10 | >3 | >150 | >75 | >5 |
Fig. 5. Correlation between oil yield per 100 m after production for 90 d and the success rate of enriched interval drilling, the Kong 2 Member, the Cangdong sag. |
2.2.2. Shale oil enriched zone evaluation
Fig. 6. (a) Fusion seismic inversion of sensitive logs and (b) comprehensive evaluation of sweet spots in the first sub-member of the Kong 2 Member, the Cangdong sag. |
2.3. Shale oil horizontal well pattern deployment technologies
2.3.1. Horizontal well spacing optimization
2.3.2. Horizontal well azimuth and length optimization
2.4. Fracturing technologies
2.4.1. Stage and cluster
2.4.2. Materials
2.4.3. Volume fracturing process
Fig. 7. Typical operation curves for (a) laminated felsic shales and (b) layered calcareous limy shales. |
2.5. Drainage-production system optimization
2.5.1. Numerical simulation to determine minimum well soaking time
Fig. 8. Wellhead pressure variation with well soaking time at different horizontal wells. |
2.5.2. Venting adjustment based on pressure drop
2.5.3. Lifting optimization
3. Practices of lacustrine shale-type shale oil production
3.1. Production results
Fig. 9. Hierarchical evaluation of normal production wells in the Cangdong sag. |
Fig. 10. Production testing curve of Well GY5-1-1L. |
3.2. Trends of production
3.2.1. Staged production decline
Fig. 11. Average daily oil production variation during natural flow production of stabilized shale oil wells. |
Fig. 12. Average daily oil production variation during mechanical recovery of stabilized shale oil wells. |
3.2.2. Time lapse of hydrocarbon components in recovered shale oil
Fig. 13. Variations of components C14+ at Well GY5-1-9H in different periods. |
Fig. 14. Correlation between light component content and daily oil production at Well GY5-1-9H in different periods. |