Introduction
1. Geologic setting
2. Types and characteristics of event deposits
Table 1. Types and characteristics of event deposits of Chang 9 Member, Ordos Basin |
Type | Subtype | Common lithology | Sedimentary structure characteristics | Genetic mechanism |
---|---|---|---|---|
Earthquake event deposit | Liquefaction flow deformation | Siltstone, sandstone | Dish structure, liquefied vein, liquefied breccia, liquefied crinkle, liquefied diapir | Seismic vibration formed the excess pore water pressure in sedimentary layers that allow for sediments liquefying and flowing |
Gravity deformation | Sandstone and mudstone with different densities | Loop bedding, sandstone load and mudstone diapir, ball- and-pillow structure | Gravity-driven vertical migration and deformation of sediments | |
Brittle shear deformation | Various rocks | Fault-graded beds, mirco-fault | Seismic vibration moved and broke or liquefied the sedimentary layers to form differential compaction | |
Gravity flow event deposit | Block slump | Various rocks | Slide surface, slump fold, abrupt structure | Instability of sediments |
Sandy debris flow | Thick massive sandstone, mud pebble- bearing sandstone | Thick massive, abrupt contact at top and bottom, floating or bedded mud and gravel | Transition of slump block | |
Turbidity current | Fine sandstone to mudstone | Normal graded bedding, bottom scour, gradual contact at top, and parallel, ripple, horizontal bedding | Transition of debris flow | |
Volcanic event deposit | Volcanic ash deposition | Tuff | Unconspicuous horizontal bedding | Volcanic eruption |
Anoxic event deposit | Anaerobic deposition | Black shale | Lamellar | Anaerobic environment |
Dysaerobic deposition | Black gray mudstone | Layered, massive | Dysaerobic environment |
2.1. Earthquake event deposits and seismites
2.1.1. Liquefaction flow deformation
Fig. 2. Typical characteristics of seismites in Chang 9 Member, Ordos Basin. (a) Well Y84, 2289.63 m, showing curve upward dish-shaped laminas on both sides of liquefied vein; (b) Well C22, 2323.36 m, liquefaction flow and emplacement of sand layer into mud layer; (c) the other side of Fig. b; (d) Well Y84, 2306.00 m, liquefaction emplacement of sand layer and micro-faulting of the overlying mud layer; (e) Well Y84, 2312.56 m, liquefaction emplacement of sand layer, and micro-faulting and tractive bending of the underlying siltstone; (f) Well C22, 2362.50 m, micro-faulting of the mud layer, appearing as gravels; (g) Well Y84, 2205.72 m, liquefied sand layer impaling the overlying mud layer, forming mud gravels; (h) Well Y84, 2226.45 m, showing mud gravels formed by liquefaction with short transport distance, varied size, and are generally angular with spiny edges, part of them can be pieced together; (i) Well C22, 2342.28 m, liquefaction flow of sand layer to form crinkled deformation; (j) Well Y84, 2299.80 m, diapir structure; (k) the other side of Fig. j; (l) Well Y84, 2207.18 m, loop bedding; (m) Well C22, 2414.78 m, gray fine sandstone separated from parent rock and then sank into the underlying dark gray muddy siltstone; (n) Well C22, 2411.31 m, gray siltstone load and dark gray muddy siltstone diaper; (o) Well C22, 2409.71 m, ball-and-pillow structure, showing broken sandstone ball-and-pillow, which partially appear as gravels, due to multiple earthquakes or an intensive earthquake; (p) Well C22, 2366.42 m, fault-graded beds with throw less than 10 mm; (q) Well C22, 2380.38 m, liquefied sand flowing and filling along fractures, with throw of about 10 mm. |
2.1.2. Gravity deformation
2.1.3. Brittle shear deformation
2.2. Gravity flow deposits
2.2.1. Slump
Fig. 3. Typical characteristics of gravity flow deposits in Chang 9 Member, Ordos Basin. (a) Well Y84, 2201.50 m, slide surface formed by block slump; (b) Well Y84, 2311.05 m, slide surface; (c) Well C22, 2385.72 m, slump fold; (d) Well C22, 2328.60 m, slide surface and slump fold; (e) Well C22, 2324.57 m, sandy debris flow deposits, generally massive; (f) Well C22, 2325.61 m, generally massive; (g) Well Y84, 2245.74 m, generally massive; (h) Well C22, 2368.02 m, abrupt sand-mud contact at the top of sandy debris flow deposits; (i) Well C22, 2368.31 m, abrupt sand-mud contact at the bottom; (j) Well Y84, 2243.98 m, floating mud gravels in sandy debris flow deposits, which are generally angular with spiny edges and partially can be spiced together; (k) the other side of Fig. j; (l) Well Y84, 2288.72 m, coarsening-upward mud gravels in sandy debris flow deposits; (m) Well Y84, 2225.90 m, fining-upward mud gravels in debris flow deposits; (n) Well Y84, 2245.43 m, part of mud gravels with original sedimentary structures; (o) Well Y84, 2259.23 m, bottom scour of turbidity current deposits; (p) Well C22, 2371.52 m, mud gravels at the bottom of turbidite current deposits; (q) Well Y84, 2263.45 m, normal graded bedding in turbidity current deposits; (r) Well C22, 2367.47 m, normal graded bedding in turbidity current deposits; (s) Well Y84, 2258.02 m, parallel bedding in turbidity current deposits; (t) Well C22, 2389.87 m, ripple bedding in the middle and lower parts, and parallel lamination in the upper part; (u) Well Y84, 2265.42 m, rhythmic layer composed of gray silts and dark gray muddy silts, laminated horizontal bedding; (v) Well C22, 2379.83 m, horizontal bedding in the lower part and ripple bedding in the upper part. |
2.2.2. Sandy debris flow
2.2.3. Turbidity current
2.3. Volcanic event deposits and tuff
Fig. 4. Characteristics of tuff, spotted sandstone and shale in Chang 9 Member, Ordos Basin. (a) Well C22, 2382.25 m, light greenish gray tuff; (b) Well C22, 2382.25 m, tuff, under plane polarized light; (c) Well Y84, 2288.63 m, spotted sandstone, with bedding-parallel muddy rip-up clasts; (d) Well Y84, 2288.63 m, spotted sandstone, under plane polarized light (e) Well Y84, 2196.50 m, black gray mudstone; (f) Well Y84, 2194.48 m, black shale; (g) Well Y84, 2196.50 m, massive mudstone, under plane polarized light; (h) Well Y84, 2194.48 m, laminated shale, under plane polarized light; (i) Well C22, 2382.30 m, laminated shale, under plane polarized light; (j) Well C22, 2316.05 m, crinkled laminas, under plane polarized light; (k) Well C22, 2349.45 m, laminated and shaly sand-mud interbeds, with thin layers of silts, containing multiple wormholes with diameter of about 1 cm and inclination of 40°-50°. |
2.4. Anoxic event deposits and source rocks
Table 2. Redox and pyrolysis parameters of shales of Chang 9 Member, Ordos Basin |
Well | Depth/m | Lithology | V/(V+Ni) | TOC/% | (S1+S2)/(mg•g-1) | S2/S3 | HI/(mg•g-1) | Tmax /°C |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C22 | 2316.01 | Black shale | 0.75 | 4.76 | 8.03 | 45 | 151 | 447 |
C22 | 2323.96 | Black shale | 0.69 | 9.55 | 26.01 | 134 | 252 | 442 |
C22 | 2331.18 | Black gray mudstone | 0.64 | 2.63 | 4.12 | 29 | 141 | 442 |
C22 | 2339.23 | Black shale | 0.68 | 4.93 | 7.85 | 45 | 145 | 446 |
C22 | 2344.06 | Black shale | 0.64 | 8.03 | 18.40 | 114 | 213 | 443 |
C22 | 2348.92 | Black gray mudstone | 0.64 | 3.22 | 5.88 | 54 | 168 | 442 |
C22 | 2351.80 | Black gray mudstone | 0.71 | 2.61 | 4.45 | 34 | 155 | 442 |
C22 | 2359.36 | Black shale | 0.84 | 8.06 | 20.44 | 104 | 232 | 441 |
C22 | 2361.25 | Black gray mudstone | 0.69 | 2.17 | 3.07 | 21 | 127 | 444 |
C22 | 2382.30 | Black shale | 0.80 | 3.98 | 9.66 | 90 | 226 | 443 |
C22 | 2384.81 | Black shale | 0.73 | 4.10 | 6.20 | 52 | 139 | 445 |
C22 | 2396.50 | Silty mudstone | 0.55 | 0.26 | 0.15 | 1 | 51 | 459 |
C22 | 2400.97 | Black gray mudstone | 0.61 | 3.40 | 3.75 | 20 | 101 | 447 |
C22 | 2401.78 | Black gray mudstone | 0.71 | 1.09 | 0.74 | 5 | 60 | 453 |
C22 | 2412.26 | Black gray mudstone | 0.68 | 3.64 | 6.12 | 37 | 152 | 443 |
Y84 | 2191.05 | Black shale | 0.90 | 14.14 | 31.48 | 145 | 205 | 458 |
Y84 | 2194.48 | Black shale | 0.65 | 4.16 | 5.95 | 32 | 124 | 459 |
Y84 | 2196.50 | Black gray mudstone | 0.51 | 2.99 | 3.19 | 16 | 92 | 463 |
Y84 | 2198.66 | Black shale | 0.82 | 4.69 | 5.67 | 30 | 107 | 462 |
Y84 | 2214.95 | Black gray mudstone | 0.63 | 2.20 | 2.65 | 13 | 92 | 462 |
Y84 | 2216.60 | Black shale | 0.61 | 5.59 | 7.88 | 33 | 123 | 458 |
Y84 | 2226.55 | Black gray mudstone | 0.61 | 2.54 | 2.59 | 13 | 89 | 462 |
Y84 | 2249.02 | Silty mudstone | 0.68 | 2.29 | 2.16 | 6 | 81 | 463 |
Y84 | 2260.40 | Black gray mudstone | 0.66 | 2.19 | 2.20 | 13 | 82 | 462 |
Y84 | 2301.72 | Black gray mudstone | 0.65 | 4.03 | 4.11 | 23 | 91 | 462 |
Y84 | 2305.02 | Black gray mudstone | 0.65 | 3.83 | 4.13 | 31 | 97 | 462 |
Fig. 5. Discrimination diagrams of anoxic event deposits of Chang 9 Member, Ordos Basin. |
Table 3. Types and characteristics of anoxic event deposits of Chang 9 Member, Ordos Basin |
Type of event deposits | Oxygen concentration/ (mL•L−1) | Depositional environment | Degree of stratification | Fine-grained component | Sedimentary structure | Bioturbation | TOC/ % | V/ (V+Ni) | S2/S3 | Organic matter type | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anoxic | Anaerobic | <0.1 | Semi-deep lake/outer fan | Strongly stratified | Black shale | Laminated, shaly | None | ˃4.0 | ˃0.65 | ˃30 | I and II1 |
Dysaerobic | 0.1-1.0 | Prodelta/ overflow | Weakly stratified | Black gray mudstone | Thin layered, massive | Visible | 1.0- 4.0 | 0.55- 0.75 | 10-40 | II1 and II2 | |
Aerobic | ˃1.0 | Delta front- plain | Not stratified | Argillaceous rock | Strong | <1.0 | <0.55 | <10 |
3. Geological significance of event deposits
3.1. Paleoenvironment and sedimentary facies
Fig. 6. Vertical sequences for event deposits of Chang 9 Member, Ordos Basin. |
3.2. Tectonic activity intensity and period
Fig. 7. Vertical distribution of event deposits and sedimentary facies column of Chang 9 Member, Ordos Basin. |
3.3. Event deposits stratigraphic correlation
3.4. Source-reservoir assemblage
Fig. 8. Event deposition model of Chang 9 Member, southwestern Ordos Basin. |