Introduction
1. Geological setting
Fig. 1. Division of tectonic units and sequence stratigraphic framework of Shahejie Formation in Dongying Sag. LST—lowstand systems tract; TST—transgressive systems tract; HST—highstand systems tract; FSST—falling stage systems tract. |
2. Fourth-order base-level changes
2.1. Fourth-order sequence division
Fig. 2. Interpretation of fourth-order sequence of ESQ2 in Middle Sha 3 Member of Well Y77 in Dongying Sag (section location shown in |
Fig. 3. (a) Third-order base-level changes in ESQ2 and (b) division of fifth-order sequence and fourth-order base-level changes in PSS2 of Well Y545. |
2.2. Fourth-order base-level changes within PSS2
3. Sedimentary characteristics and sandbody distribution of sublacustrine fans
3.1. Lithofacies associations
Fig. 4. Typical core photos of gravity flow sandstones in PSS2. (a) Well S102, 3291.26 m, clean massive fine sandstone (S3) in the upper part and massive fine sandstone with imbricated mud-clasts (S2) in the lower part, where mud-clasts are arranged in imbricate form and close to the scoured surface; (b) Well S103, 3294.25 m, massive fine sandstone with floating clasts (S4), layered plant fragments visible on top; (c) Well S106, 3411.67 m, fine sandstone with cross-bedding (S1) and fine sandstone with parallel bedding (S6), separated by scoured surfaces; (d) Well S102, 3287.24 m, siltstone with ripple bedding (S7); (e) Well S102, 3290.55 m, muddy siltstone with horizontal bedding (S8); (f) Well S3-12-12, 3165.82 m, sandstone with deformed bedding (S9), with deformed mudstone and irregular sandy mass; (g) Well S3-12-12, 3163.60 m, massive fine sandstone with muddy rip-ups (S5); (h) Well S3-12-12, 3166.89 m, sandstone with deformed bedding (S9), with sandstone injections. |
Table 1. Lithofacies classification of gravity flow deposits in the study area |
| Lithofacies | Depositional features | Sedimentary process | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fine sandstone with cross-bedding (S1) | Cross-bedding, sometimes with a little plant fragments and muddy rip-ups at the bottom | Bed-load transport [6-7] | Quasi-steady high-density turbidity current [10,22] |
| Massive fine sandstone with imbricated mud- clasts (S2) | Low mud content, a little muddy rip-ups at the bottom distributed along the bedding, and the inner reddish mud clasts arranged in imbricated formation along scoured surface | Bed-load transport [6-7], traction carpet [9] | Quasi-steady high-density turbidity current [10,22], high-density turbidity current [9] |
| Clean massive fine sandstone (S3) | Low mud content, massive texture, sometimes with abundant plant fragments | Traction carpet [9] | High-density turbidity current [9] |
| Massive fine sandstone with floating clasts (S4) | Massive structure, a small amount of reddish mud clasts and muddy rip-ups, with intermittent horizontally distributed plant fragment layer on the top | Traction carpet [9] | High-density turbidity current [9] |
| Massive fine sandstone with muddy rip-ups (S5) | Massive structure, a large number of dark mud clasts and sub-vertical muddy rip-ups | Mass transport [9,11,23] | Sandy debris flow [9,11,23] |
| Fine sandstone with parallel bedding (S6) | Parallel bedding | Traction carpet [9], suspended-load transport [6-7,9 -10,24] | High-density turbidity current [9], low-density turbidity current [9] |
| Siltstone with ripple bedding (S7) | Ripple cross-bedding, with muddy laminae | Suspended-load transport [6-7,9 -10,24] | Low-density turbidity current [9] |
| Muddy siltstone with horizontal bedding (S8) | Horizontal bedding, with muddy laminae | Suspended-load transport [6-7,9 -10,24] | Low-density turbidity current [9] |
| Sandstone with deformed bedding (S9) | Deformed bedding, convolute bedding and sandstone injection | Mass transport [9,11,23] | Slump [9,11,23] |
Fig. 5. Pattern of lithofacies associations of gravity flow in the study area. |
3.2. Types and characteristics of sedimentary units
Fig. 6. Sedimentary sequences and grain-size probability cumulative curves of sedimentary units in the study area. GR—gamma ray; SP—spontaneous potential. |
3.3. Distribution of sublacustrine fan sandbodies
Fig. 7. 90° phase-shifted seismic section and amplitude attribute slice in the study area. |
Fig. 8. Sandbody thickness distribution of fifth-order sequences in the study area during PSS2. |
Fig. 9. Dominant sedimentary microfacies and thickness proportion of lithofacies associations of cored wells during PSS2 in the study area. |
4. Depositional architecture of sublacustrine fans
4.1. Differences in depositional architectures of channel and lobe complexes in the same stage
Fig. 10. Architectural profile of channel and lobe in dendritic sublacustrine fans at the rising stage (PSS2-9) of fourth-order base-level (see |
4.2. Sedimentary architectural differences in sublacustrine fans in different stages
Fig. 11. Architectural profile of channel and lobe in dendritic sublacustrine fans at the early falling stage (PSS2-5) of fourth-order base-level (see |
Fig. 12. Architectural profile of channel and lobe in dendritic sublacustrine fans at the late falling stage (PSS2-2) of fourth-order base-level (see |
4.3. Dimensions of sublacustrine fans
Fig. 13. Quantitative characterization parameters of dendritic sublacustrine fans at different stages. |
5. Discussion
5.1. Trigger mechanisms of sublacustrine fans formed by gravity flows in the early stage of forced regression
5.2. Control of fourth-order base-level changes on the planar morphology of sublacustrine fans
5.3. Control of fourth-order base-level changes on depositional architecture of sublacustrine fans
Fig. 14. Control of the fourth-order base-level changes on planar morphology and depositional architecture of sublacustrine fans. |