Origin of gas condensate reservoir in Fuman Oilfield, Tarim Basin, NW China

  • WANG Qinghua 1, 2, 3, *
Expand
  • 1. Tarim Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China
  • 2. R&D Center for Ultra-Deep Complex Reservoir Exploration and Development, CNPC, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China
  • 3. Engineering Research Center of Ultra-deep Complex Oil and Gas Reservoir Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China
*E-mail: wqh-tlm@petrochina.com.cn

Received date: 2023-06-08

  Revised date: 2023-10-10

  Online published: 2023-12-28

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(42230816)

PetroChina Science and Technology Project(2021DJ1501)

Tarim Oilfield Technology Project(T202112)

Abstract

To understand the reservoir property and hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of the Middle and Upper Ordovician intraplatform shoal between ultra-deep main strike-slip faults in Fuman Oilfield of the Tarim Basin, China, the main strike-slip faults in and around well FD1 in the basin were analyzed in terms of sedimentary facies, sequence stratigraphy, intraplatform shoal reservoir property, and oil and gas origins, based on drilling data. The Yingshan Formation intraplatform shoal between the main strike-slip faults is superimposed with low-order faults to form a new type of hydrocarbon play. Firstly, hydrocarbons generated from the Lower Cambrian Yuertusi Formation source rocks vertically migrated into the second member of Yingshan Formation through the main strike-slip faults, and then migrated laterally until they were accumulated. A small amount of oil from Well FD1 came from the Yuertusi Formation source rocks in the mature stage, and a large amount of gas originated from oil cracking in the ultra-deep reservoirs. Therefore, the secondary gas condensate reservoir in Well FD1 is characterized by high gas to oil ratio, dry gas (dryness coefficient being 0.970) and hybrid origin. This new type of hydrocarbon play characterized by intraplatform shoal and low-order fault suggests a prospect of continuous hydrocarbon-bearing area in Fuman Oilfield, which will expand the ultrap-deep oil and gas exploration in the oilfield.

Cite this article

WANG Qinghua . Origin of gas condensate reservoir in Fuman Oilfield, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023 , 50(6) : 1295 -1307 . DOI: 10.1016/S1876-3804(24)60467-2

Introduction

With the support of 3D seismic attribute fusion technology, important progress has been made in recent years in the effective identification [1-2], internal structure sculpting [3-8], kinematic characterization [9-11], and dynamics mode building [12-14] of strike-slip faults in the deep to ultra-deep layers in the Tarim Basin. Around the exploration of the strike-slip fault zones, geological resources of 10×108 t of oil equivalent have been proven in the Fuman Oilfield [15-16]. However, with the continuous advancement of oil and gas exploration in major strike- slip fault zones, finding new exploration areas among faults is an important way to maintain the increase of ultra-deep oil and gas reserves and production. Recently, well FD1 made a breakthrough to the condensate gas reservoirs in the second member of the Yingshan Formation in the Ordovician intraplatform shoals between two NE-trending strike-slip faults (FI19 and FI20) in the Fuman Oilfield. It not only broke through the forbidden exploration zone in the ultra-deep carbonate intraplatform shoal below 8000 m, but also confirmed that the intraplatform shoal has the ability to accumulate oil and gas between major faults [17]. During the formation of major strike-slip faults, due to relative displacement difference, large-scale secondary faults are developed between the major fault zones. The exploration breakthrough in well FD1 confirmed that the intraplatform shoal reservoirs modified by secondary faults have an important exploration potential and is the next focus of exploration in the Fuman Oilfield. Therefore, it is of great significance to determine the mechanism of condensate gas reservoirs to deeply understand the factors on oil and gas accumulation in the ultra-deep reservoirs in the eastern part of the Fuman Oilfield.
The formation of deep to ultra-deep condensate gas reservoirs can be attributed to two mechanisms: primary and secondary. The former refers to the condensate gas generated directly from the organic matter in highly mature stage, while the latter refers to the condensate gas reservoirs transformed from early reservoirs, by crude oil cracking and gas injection. The formation of condensate gas reservoirs must have two conditions: (1) The formation temperature is between the critical temperature of the hydrocarbon system and the critical condensation temperature, and the formation pressure is greater than the dew point pressure at the formation temperature. (2) The gas content of hydrocarbons exceeds the amount of liquids, creating conditions for liquid retrograde condensation in the gas phase, which is the main way to form secondary condensate gas reservoir [18-22].
Crude oil cracking is an important factor controlling the formation of deep to ultra-deep marine gas reservoirs in China. Crude oil cracking is controlled by a variety of factors, such as temperature, pressure, thermal gradient, and type of kerogen, among which temperature is the most important controlling factor. Early researches suggested that the temperature for crude oil cracking to natural gas is 150-190 °C [23-24]. Although the threshold temperature for crude oil cracking (or the lowest temperature for crude oil preservation) varies greatly from region to region due to many factors, more and more exploration examples [25-31] and crude oil cracking experiments [32-35] have shown that liquid hydrocarbon can be preserved at least 170-180 °C, and the threshold temperature for a large amount of crude oil cracking to produce natural gas is 190-220 °C. The condensate gas reservoir of well FD1 is characterized by high temperature and high pressure. Both the reservoir and that below it has entered the window for crude oil cracking, so it is necessary to clarify its hydrocarbon genesis.
This paper analyzes the formation process of condensate gas reservoirs of well FD1 based on drilling results, low-order faults, and the physical properties and hydrocarbon genesis of the reservoirs in intraplatform shoals. The findings will provide supports for deep understanding of the reservoir conditions and distribution rules in the Middle and Upper Ordovician intraplatform shoals in the ultra-deep low-order fault zones, the Tarim Basin.

1. Geological background

The Fuman Oilfield is located at the center of the A’man Transitional Belt, and bounded the Tabei Paleo- uplift in the north, the Tazhong Paleo-uplift in the south, the A’wati Sag in the west, and the Manjiaer Sag in the east, and the main part is in the A’man Transitional Belt in the northern depression (Fig. 1a). From the Cambrian to the early Middle and Late Ordovician, the main part of the Tarim Basin was a platform, and the platform margin was oriented in the south-north direction. Under the control of the third episode of the middle Caledonian movement (TO1-2y2), the stress field in the Tarim Basin changed from tensile to compressive in the late Middle and Late Ordovician [36-38], and the platform margin changed from NS to nearly WE [39]. At the same time, NE and NW trending strike-slip fault systems began to develop in the plate [7] (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1. (a) Location of the study area and (b) location of well FD 1 in the Fuman Oilfield.
The carbonate reservoirs in the Ordovician Yingshan- Yijianfang formations in the Fuman Oilfield are fractured- vuggy carbonate reservoirs controlled by strike-slip faults. On the plane, oil and gas are mainly distributed as strips along the deep and big faults or the secondary faults connecting sources, generally characterized by "big fault, big reservoir" and "small fault, small reservoir". There is no uniform OWC (oil-water contact) in different fault belts, and even in different traps in the same fault belt. The main sources of Ordovician oil and gas in the A’man Transition Belt are the hydrocarbon source rocks in the condensed section of slope facies in the Lower Cambrian Yuertusi Formation and the hydrocarbon source rocks of the Cambrian to the Middle-Lower Ordovician basin-slope facies in the eastern Manjiaer Sag. The comprehensive research of fluid inclusions and geochemical characteristics of hydrocarbons shows that the key period of hydrocarbon accumulation is from Late Hercynian to Himalayan Period. Hydrocarbon accumulation is characterized by “Cambrian hydrocarbon source, vertical transport, and multi-stage and fault-controlled accumulation” [40].

2. The FD1 reservoirs

2.1. Geological characteristics

Drilling data reveals that the Yingshan Formation platform facies is 80-240 m thick in the Fuman area, and it is the thinnest in the northwest and northeast areas, generally less than 100 m, and the thickness is stable in the A’man Transition Belt in the northern depression (140-200 m), and becomes thicker towards the Manjiaer Sag [41]. The Yingshan Formation lasting 10.4 Ma is divided into two third-order sequences and four fourth- order sequences [42]. The three-order sequences (To1-2y2) divide the Yingshan Formation into two members (upper and lower). The exposure time of the interface (TO1p) between the Yingshan Formation and the underlying Penglaiba Formation is less than 8 Ma [42]. According to the short-term exposed interface (scouring and eroding, oxidizing and selective and penecontemporaneous dissolution), early diagenetic signs (ctenoid texture, geopetal structure) and lithologic conversion surface, the upper member of the Yingshan Formation (Y2) is divided into two fourth-order sequences (Y21 and Y22) (Fig. 2)
Fig. 2. Comprehensive stratigraphic histogram of well FD 1.
The lower member of Yingshan Formation (Y1) was developed in a tensile tectonic environment which was characterized by a restricted platform facie distributed from south to north. Y2 gradually changed to open platform facies distributed near east to west with changing from a tensile tectonic environment to a compressional tectonic environment. The platform facies are divided into three subfacies: intraplatform shoal, interplatform depression or platform flat, platform margin shoal [43]. The reservoirs in Y2 in well FD1 belong to an intraplatform sandy debris shoal (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3. (a) Structures, sedimentation, and GOR distribution at the top of the Yijianfang Formation around well FD1 and (b-e) fault morphology index maps with 0.25 subduction coefficient.
Well FD1 was drilled since March 10, 2022, and completed in Y22 at MD 8359.05 m and VD 8318.39 m on September 6, 2022 (Fig. 2). During the drilling, overflow occurred for 3 times, and the cumulative lost circulation of drilling fluid with density of 1.20-2.35 g/cm3 is 6713.9 m3. Gas measurement found 41.95 m thick reservoir with the maximum total hydrocarbon of 99.9%, indicating a high-quality reservoir. In the LST (Lowstand Systems Tract) of every third-order sequence, interlayer karstification occurred due to the exposure of the intraplatform shoal to the surface and the leaching of meteoric fresh water. Alveolar cavernous quasi-layered reservoirs are found in the inner reef of the platform margin, and dissolution caves are found in the contemporaneous faults. However, early dissolution caves generally developed 2-4 generations of cements in the late burial stage [44], and these dissolution caves are prone to collapse and difficult to preserve.
Table 1 lists the measured porosity and permeability of reservoir cores in the Yijianfang and Yingshan formations in the Tarim Basin. The average residual porosity of the reservoirs is about 2% after severely filled and interlayer karstification in the intraplatform shoal. The porosity of the reservoir with interlayer karst caverns and weakly filled is 8%-9%. The porosity of the reservoir after interlayer karstification and hydrothermal alteration (silicification) reaches 19%, and the contribution of hydrothermal alteration to the reservoir porosity is 8%-10% [45]. Taking into account the fractures in strike-slip faults and the large-scale caves caused by deep circulation of karst fluid [46], the deep to ultra-deep Ordovician intraplatform shoal in the A’man Transition Belt has the conditions to become high-quality porous-fractured- cavernous reservoirs.
Table 1. Measured porosity and permeability of deep to ultra-deep Ordovician rock core in the Tarim Basin
Well/Region Layer Porosity/% Permeability/10-3 μm2 Remark Data source
Range Average Range Average
SHN4 O2yj 9.20 0.01 1 full diameter sample with
interlayer karstification
References [42, 45]
O1-2y1 0.6-3.8 1.90 0.040-1.040 0.31 4 full diameter samples with
interlayer karstification
O1-2y2 17.5-20.5 19.00 23.500-73.400 48.45 2 full diameter samples with
silicification and interlayer karstification
SHN7 O2yj 0.2-3.5 1.95 0.002-3.500 1.24 11 full diameter samples with
interlayer karstification
O1-2y1 1.3-3.9 2.35 0.040-3.700 0.61 13 full diameter samples with
interlayer karstification
SHN6 O2yj 0.5-2.4 1.19 0.010-4.900 0.92 10 full diameter core samples
SHB2 O2yj 1.0-4.4 2.10 0.010-3.700 0.30 Reference [43]
O1-2y1 1.7-3.2 1.70 0.020-38.800 3.80
O1-2y1 8.00 2 silicified core samples
Shunbei Oilfield O1-2y—O2yj 2.0-9.0 2.07 0.010-5.520 <1.00 71 core samples Reference [46]
Fuman Oilfield O1-2y—O2yj 1.8-4.5 2.17 0.100-1.000 Reference [47]
Tazhong Uplift O1-2y2 1.8-4.5 <0.010 or >10.000 Logging data from Wells G60, G70, T162 Reference [48]

2.2. Low-order fault zone

Well FD1 is located at the low-order fault zone between two first-order NE strike-slip faults (FI19 and FI20) (Fig. 3a). These secondary faults are vaguely visible on TO3t and TO1-2y2 morphological index maps with 0.25 subduction coefficient. They are mainly NEE and NNE trending and locally NW trending, and consistent with the occurrence of the first-order strike-slip faults (Fig. 3b, 3c). But they are not visible on the morphologic index map with 0.25 subduction coefficient at the interface of the Upper Cambrian top and the Lower Cambrian bottom (Fig. 3d, 3e). FI19 fault can be seen at the top of the Yijianfang Formation, the bottom of the Yingshan Formation, the top of the Upper Cambrian and the bottom of the Lower Cambrian, indicating that the first-order strike-slip fault runs through the Lower Cambrian from the Yijianfang Formation, and it is a good channel for vertical oil and gas migration. FI20 is visible at the Upper Cambrian top, but it is not visible at the Lower Cambrian bottom.
On the WE seismic profile across well FD1 (Fig. 4a), there not only developed dense inner low-order faults, but also developed extremely dense inner beads caused by multi-periods interlayer karstification at the third and fourth sequence interfaces in the Middle-Lower Ordovician intraplatform shoals. Observed on the deeper seismic profile (Fig. 4b), the low-order faults and beads were formed during the key tectonic revolution of the third episode of the Middle Caledonian movement [37-38], and they are not directly connected with the source rocks of the Lower Cambrian Yuertusi Formation. This indicates that the low-order faults play an important role in the development of high-quality reservoirs and hydrocarbon migration. On the other hand, it also shows that oil and gas must vertically migrate to the carrier layer through the first-order strike-slip fault that connects the source rocks of the Yuertusi Formation, and then laterally migrate and accumulate.
Fig. 4. 3D seismic profile across well FD1 (see the section location in Fig. 3). (a) AA' seismic profile; (b) "米-type" seismic profile. TP—Bottom of the Permian; TC—Bottom of the Carboniferous; TS—Bottom of the Silurian; TO3t—Bottom of the Tumuxiuke Formation; TO1—2y2—Bottom of the second submember of Upper Yingshan Formation; TO1—2y—Bottom of Yingshan Formation; TO1p—Bottom of Penglaiba Formation; T—C3—Bottom of Upper Cambrian; T—C2—Bottom of Middle Cam-brian; T—C—Bottom of Cambrian.

2.3. Temperature, pressure and fluid characteristics

Routine test was conducted at 7925.00-8359.05 m in well FD1. The tubing pressure is 90.07 MPa, the open flow gas is 405 053 m3/d, and the open flow oil is 24.276 m3/d through a 7 mm nozzle. The GOR is 16 685 m3/m3, indicating a condensate gas reservoir.
Based on twelve wells drilled into the Middle-Upper Ordovician by the Sinopec Northwest China Petroleum Bureau in the FI17 strike-slip fault (the middle depth of the oil and gas layer is 7549.20-8185.19 m), the formation temperature of the Middle-Upper Ordovician is 152-171 °C, the formation pressure is 61.76-91.64 MPa, and the pressure coefficient is 0.81-1.21, indicating a normal to low-amplitude overpressure system. In two wells drilled into the Middle-Upper Ordovician in the FI20 strike-slip fault zone (the middle depth of the oil and gas layer is 8062.01-8178.01 m), the formation temperature of the Middle-Upper Ordovician is 141-178 °C, the formation pressure is 72.81-95.47 MPa, and the pressure coefficient is 0.92-1.19, also indicating a normal to low-amplitude overpressure system. Therefore, the formation temperature at 8000 m in and around well FD1 is 160-180 °C; the formation pressure is greater than 90 MPa, and the pressure coefficient is not more than 1.2, indicating a normal to low-amplitude overpressure system.
GOR is 223-923 m3/m3 in FI16, 417-3524 m3/m3 in FI17, 420-1789 m3/m3 in FI19, and 2876-7652 m3/m3 in FI20 (Table 2). GOR shows an increasing trend from north to south and from west to east [15,49] (Fig. 3). However, the GOR in Well FD1 in a low-order fault zone is high (16 685 m3/m3), even an order of magnitude higher than that in FI20 strike-slip fault. Its genetic mechanism still needs to be further understood.
Table 2. GOR in and around well FD 1 in the Fuman Oilfield
Fault Zone Well Layer GOR (m3/m3)
Low-order fault zone
between FI19 and FI20
FD1 O1—2y 16 685
FI16 FY3-H2 O1—2y 923
FI16 FY304H O1—2y 223
FI17 HD32-H1 O1—2y 417
FI17 MS504H O1—2y 485
FI17 MS2 O1—2y 550
FI17 MS5-H2 O2yj 522
FI19 MS7 O1—2y 420
FI19 MS701 O1—2y 622
FI19 MS702 O1—2y 633
FI19 MS71 O1—2y 1789
FI20 MS8 O1—2y 2760

3. Analysis of hydrocarbons genesis

3.1. Genesis of crude oil

The content of saturated hydrocarbon in the crude oil in well FD1 is as high as 80.6%, but only 2.4% aromatic hydrocarbon, 0.8% resin, and 0.53% asphaltene. The ratio of saturated to aromatic hydrocarbons is 33.58. The aromatic hydrocarbon is primarily composed of naphthalene compounds, and the naphthalene-to-phenanthrene ratio is approximately 6. The ratio of pristane to phytane (Pr/Ph) is 1.00; Ph/nC18 = 0.13; Pr/nC17 = 0.12; C27, C28, and C29 steranes are 35.25%, 27.05%, and 37.70%, respectively; C24Tet/C26TT = 0.92; and Re/P (retene/phenanthrene) = 0.016. In addition, a little gammacerane was detected (Fig. 5). These characteristics suggest that the crude oil was mainly generated from algae-bearing organic matter, which formed in a more reducing environment with saltwater-brackish water.
Fig. 5. Crude oil mass chromatogram in Well FD1 (m/z=191).
The equivalent vitrinite reflectance (Rc) value of the crude oil in well FD1 is 0.77%, calculated using the methylphenanthrene index (MPI) formula (Rc = 0.88 × MPI + 0.2). The Rc value suggests that the crude oil is mature, and it was generated near the hydrocarbon generation peak.
Comparative analysis of biomarker composition indicates a strong correlation between the crude oil from well FD1 and the source rock of the Yuertusi Formation in well LT1 [21,50] (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6. Comparison of biomarkers of crude oil from well FD1 with the source rock of Yuertusi Formation in well LT1 (adapted from Reference [21]).

3.2. Origin of natural gas

The natural gas from well FD1 contains 95.45 mol% CH4, 2.59 mol% C2H6, 0.70 mol% C3H8, 0.30 mol% iC4H10, 0.45 mol% nC4H10, 0.19 mol% iC5H12, and 0.17 mol% nC5H12. The drying coefficient is 0.97, indicating dry gas. The δ13C values are as follows: δ13C1 ranges from -48.10‰ to -47.57‰, δ13C2 from -27.90‰ to -27.77‰, δ13C3 from -26.30‰ to -26.23‰, δ13CiC4 from -28.40‰ to -28.35‰, and δ13CnC5 from -26.30 ‰ to -26.25‰ (Table 3).
Table 3. Analysis results of natural gas compositions and stable carbon isotopic compositions in the Fuman Oilfield
Fault zones Well Layer Depth/
m
Dry coefficient Mole fraction/mol% δ13C/‰ Ro1/
%
Ro2/
%
Data sources
CH4 C2H4 C3H8 iC4H10 nC4H10 iC5H12 nC5H12 CH4 C2H4 C3H8 iC4H10 nC4H10
Secondary faults between
FI19 and FI20
FD1 O1-2y2 7925.00-
8359.05
−48.10 −27.90 −26.30 −28.40 −26.30 0.61 0.77 PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development
0.970 95.45 2.59 0.70 0.30 0.45 0.19 0.17 −47.57 −27.77 −26.23 −28.35 −26.25 0.65 0.81 China University
of Geosciences
(Wuhan)
FII17 FY105X O2yj 7369.00-
7435.00
0.754 70.67 9.48 6.38 1.50 2.88 0.87 0.99 Tarim Oilfield Company
FI15 FY303-
H2
O2yj 7235.50-
7429.60
0.611 56.73 14.50 11.51 2.38 4.73 1.08 1.19
FI5 GL1 O1-2y2 7530.00-
7750.00
80.96 9.97 4.58 0.74 1.26 0.24 0.20
FI5 GL2 O2yj+O1-2y 7342.00-
7628.04
85.51 4.19 0.88 0.44 0.54 0.26 0.21
FI5 GL3 O2yj+O1-2y 7684.11-
8505.98
−49.99 −32.46 −31.06 −31.49 −29.99 0.50 0.63
FI5 GL3-H12 O2yj 7652.00-
7986.26
0.002 0.16 29.40 23.97 6.25 11.75 3.26 3.46
FI10 GL3-H6 O2yj 7635.00-
7807.13
0.727 66.44 10.82 6.36 1.47 2.95 0.95 1.14
FI17 HD32-H9 O2yj 7256.00-
7634.00
0.774 72.23 10.50 5.76 1.05 2.15 0.52 0.64
FI17 MS1 O2yj 7509.50-
7665.62
0.895 82.16 5.59 2.27 0.47 0.71 0.20 0.19
FI17 MS1-H1 O2yj 7484.00-
7716.00
0.706 58.95 8.29 6.50 2.03 3.72 1.32 1.37
FI17 MS1-H2 O2yj 7480.00-
8128.00
0.776 67.48 7.40 5.10 1.52 2.71 0.94 0.97
FI17 MS2 O1-2y2 8057.96-
8470.00
0.779 72.24 7.67 5.22 1.58 2.83 1.02 1.07
FI17 MS301H O1-2y 7532.00-
8639.60
−46.15 −34.09 −32.39 −32.32 −31.38 0.75 0.94
FI17 MS301H O1-2y 7532.00-
8639.60
−46.05 −33.96 −32.18 −31.74 −31.06 0.76 0.95
FI17 MS4 O2yj 7573.00-
8202.00
−43.54 −32.49 −30.80 −30.55 −29.35 0.99 1.24
FI17 MS4 O2yj 7573.00-
8202.00
−43.86 −32.28 −29.99 −29.68 −28.63 0.96 1.20
FI17 MS4 O2yj 7573.00-
8208.00
0.752 71.85 6.95 5.06 1.85 3.28 1.43 1.48
FI17 MS401H O2yj 7499.50-
8240.00
0.824 76.30 6.24 3.96 1.28 2.13 0.85 0.82
FI17 MS501H O2yj 7613.00-
8033.00
0.765 67.99 8.18 5.63 1.47 2.92 0.88 0.97
FI17 MS502H O1-2y1 7370.50-
7820.00
0.685 63.73 9.53 8.53 2.56 4.71 1.44 1.45
FI17 MS503H O2yj 7596.00-
8305.00
0.708 61.95 8.05 7.03 2.34 4.25 1.41 1.36
FI17 MS5-H4 O2yj 7652.00-
8116.00
0.698 60.63 8.47 7.16 2.27 4.34 1.43 1.50
FI6 YM10 O2yj 7198.09-
7237.55
0.718 67.59 9.43 7.35 2.06 3.84 1.26 1.33
FII9 YM1-8 O2yj 7276.05-
7342.00
0.800 75.72 6.67 4.89 1.54 2.70 0.99 1.03
FI6 YM211H O2yj 7463.00-
7690.00
0.362 30.88 19.39 18.99 4.27 7.43 1.68 1.63
FI6 YM211-
H2
O2yj 7491.00-
8030.00
0.001 0.12 25.65 23.81 6.17 12.10 3.57 3.79
FI6 YM21-2X O2yj 7521.96-
7885.00
0.640 56.31 11.48 8.78 2.32 4.67 1.43 1.59
FI6 YM21-4X O2yj 7561.50-
7765.10
0.709 60.10 10.26 6.26 1.55 3.12 1.02 1.19
FI6 YM21-5X O2yj 7510.00-
7935.00
0.785 68.71 9.79 4.42 0.88 1.68 0.55 0.64
FI7 YM 2-3X O2yj 7251.22-
7331.00
0.718 66.43 9.02 6.85 2.04 3.80 1.35 1.54
FI7 YM 2-4X O2yj 7317.68-
7395.00
0.615 57.82 11.84 10.45 3.06 5.53 1.80 1.95
FI7 YM6C1 O2yj 7420.00-
7480.00
0.705 63.10 9.13 7.31 2.14 3.99 1.31 1.36
FI10 YM801-
H6
O2yj 7278.00-
7440.00
0.844 78.08 6.68 3.59 0.90 1.58 0.53 0.56

Note: Ro1 and Ro2 are the thermal maturity of natural gas calculated based on carbon isotope composition of methane by two methods in references [51-53].

Compared with the natural gas in the strike-slip fault zones in the Shunbei and Fuman areas, the natural gas from well FD1 exhibits abnormally heavy C2-C4 carbon isotopic compositions, and similar C1 carbon isotope composition (Fig. 7), but no H2S. This suggests that the origin of the natural gas in well FD1 is different from that in the major strike-slip fault zone in the Shunbei and Fuman areas, and it has not been altered by thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR). Although the C2-C4 carbon isotope compositions are similar to those of dry gas directly generated from type III kerogen and crude oil cracking at higher temperature, the C1 methane carbon isotope is lighter. The reason may be attributed to the mixing of the (allochthonous) crude oil cracking gas from ultra-deep reservoirs after evaporation fractionation, with a small amount of (in-situ) Ordovician crude oil cracking gas, which results in such dry gas with a high GOR [51].
Fig. 7. Relationship between the reciprocal of carbon number (1/n) of natural gas and its stable carbon isotope composition.
Based on the relationship between C2/C3 ratio and (δ13C2-δ13C3 values) (Fig. 8), there are associated gas from kerogen cracking and secondary cracking gas from crude oil and natural gas in the Tazhong area. In the Gucheng zone and Shunnan areas, natural gas is primarily originated from secondary cracking gas, with a small proportion of crude oil cracking gas, suggesting an open system. In the Shunbei area, the natural gas primarily consists of secondary cracking gas from crude oil, and a minor amount of kerogen cracking gas. The maturity ranges from 0.5% to 1.1% [54], indicating of a close system. The natural gas from well FD1 is a semi-open system with secondary cracking gas from crude oil. The equivalent maturity value (Ro is 0.77% to 0.81%, Table 3) is similar to its crude oil maturity (Ro is 0.77%) and does not exhibit the characteristics of “heavy oil and dry gas” [20].
Fig. 8. Relationship between C2/C3 and (δ13C213C3) (Shunbei data from Reference [54]; Shunnan-Gucheng data from Reference [22]; and Lungudong and Tazhong data from references [55-56].
The relationship between the ln(C1/C2) and ln(C2/C3) ratios of natural gas in Fig. 9 further confirms that the primary source of natural gas in the well FD1 is from crude oil cracking. Moreover, it reveals that the maturity (Ro) of this gas ranges from 1.5% to 2.0%, surpassing the maturity estimated only based on C1. It demonstrates that the natural gas in the well FD1 not only has the characteristics of “mixed sources” but also exhibits higher maturity indicated by the carbon isotopes of C2 and C3. Therefore, utilizing a single component or one method to characterize the maturity of such mixed-genesis natural gas is insufficient and often leads to conflicting results.
Fig. 9. Relationship between ln(C1/C2) and ln(C2/C3).
According to the results of previous studies, the current formation temperature in the Ordovician fault-controlled oil and gas reservoirs in the west of the FI10 fault zone is 160-180 °C, and the crude oil has not cracked [29,54,57-58]. In the south of the FI10-FI20 strike-slip faults, the fault-controlled oil and gas reservoirs in the major Ordovician faults aroumd the Manjiaer area encounter increasing trends of gas injection and GOR [49], which is caused by gas injection from crude oil cracking in ultra-deep formations, rather than the high reservoir temperature.
The relationship between lnχn and carbon number n of n-alkanes shows 9% loss of n-alkanes (Q) (Fig. 10). We consider that considerable crude oil cracking gas from deeper reservoirs migrated upwardly and accumulated in the overlying Ordovician reservoirs. At high temperature, a little early crude oil cracked and resulted in gas injection (similar to the Shunbei FI10 strike-slip fault) [59]. This phenomenon ultimately contributes to distinct gas condensate accumulation known as “secondary condensate gas reservoir” [18-19].
Fig. 10. Relationship between the carbon number (n) and lnχn of n-alkanes of crude oil from well FD1 (f is the theoretical difference of the molar mass logarithm between measured mass of n-alkane and fractionated mass; χn is the molar content of n-alkanes with carbon number n; Q is the loss of n-alkanes).

4. Conclusions

The fault-controlled intraplatform shoal facies of the Yingshan Formation in the major strike-slip fault zone in the Fuman Oilfield has good conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation under deeply buried karstification. The mudstone of the Sangtamu Formation is an indirect caprock, and the tight limestone of the Yijianfang Formation and the first section of the upper member of the Yingshan Formation is a direct caprock. Hydrocarbon generated from the Lower Cambrian Yuertusi Formation source rock vertically migrated through the neighboring major strike-slip faults into the second section of the upper member of the Yingshan Formation and accumulated laterally. This is a new reservoir model called “intraplatform shoal and lower-order faults-controlled reservoir” like that in well FD1.
The genetic analysis of oil and gas in well FD1, which is located at the low-order faults between major strike-slip faults FI19 and FI20, indicates a small amount of oil comes from the mature Lower Cambrian Yuertusi Formation source rock, and a large amount of gas is ultra-deep oil cracking gas. They contribute to the condensate gas in well FD1, characterized by dry gas and hybrid secondary condensate gas with high GOR.
This new reservoir model provides a possibility to expand the exploration scope and build a continuous oil and gas development field in the major strike-slip fault zones in the Fuman Oilfield.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Han Jianfa, Zhang Yintao, Zhang Yanqiu from Tarim Oilfield Company, and Prof. Chen Honghan and Prof. Ping Hongwei of China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) for their supports.
[1]
LI Shuzhen, LI Xiangwen, ZHANG Jianwei, et al. Application of curvature attribute technique of GeoEast software to faults investigation of carbonate rocks. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2016, 30(2): 53-55, 79.

[2]
LIU Jun, REN Lidan, LI Zongjie, et al. Seismic identification and evaluation of deep carbonate faults and fractures in Shunnan area, Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(4): 703-710.

[3]
JIAO Fangzheng. Significance of oil and gas exploration in NE strike-slip fault belts in Shuntuoguole area of Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(5): 831-839.

[4]
DENG S, LI H L, ZHANG Z P, et al. Structural characterization of intracratonic strike-slip faults in the central Tarim Basin. AAPG Bulletin, 2019, 103(1): 109-137.

DOI

[5]
DENG S, ZHAO R, KONG Q F, et al. Two distinct strike-slip fault networks in the Shunbei area and its surroundings, Tarim Basin: Hydrocarbon accumulation, distribution, and controlling factors. AAPG Bulletin, 2022, 106(1): 77-102.

DOI

[6]
LI Guohui, LI Shiyin, LI Huiyuan, et al. Distribution pattern and formation mechanism of the strike-slip fault system in the central Tarim Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(3): 30-37.

[7]
NENG Y, LI Y, QI J F, et al. Deformation styles and multi-stage evolution history of a large intraplate strike-slip fault system in a Paleozoic superimposed basin: A case study from the Tarim Basin, NW China. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2022, 10: 837354.

DOI

[8]
LIU Yuqing, DENG Shang. Structural analysis of intraplate strike-slip faults with small to medium displacement: A case study of the Shunbei 4 fault, Tarim Basin. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2022, 51(1): 124-136.

[9]
MA Qingyou, CAO Zicheng, JIANG Huashan, et al. Source-connectivity of strike slip fault zone and its relationship with oil and gas accumulation in Tahe-Shunbei area, Tarim Basin. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2020, 25(4): 327-334.

[10]
LIN Bo, ZHANG Xu, KUANG Anpeng, et al. Structural deformation characteristics of strike-slip faults in Tarim Basin and their hydrocarbon significance: A case study of No.1 fault and No. 5 fault in Shunbei area. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7): 906-923.

[11]
HAN X Y, DENG S, TANG L J, et al. Geometry, kinematics and displacement characteristics of strike-slip faults in the northern slope of Tazhong uplift in Tarim Basin: A study based on 3D seismic data. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, 88: 410-427.

DOI

[12]
WU Guanghui, MA Bingshan, HAN Jianfa, et al. Origin and growth mechanisms of strike-slip faults in the central Tarim cratonic basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(3): 510-520.

[13]
YUN Lu, DENG Shang. Structural styles of deep strike-slip faults in Tarim Basin and the characteristics of their control on reservoir formation and hydrocarbon accumulation: A case study of Shunbei oil and gas field. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(6): 770-787.

DOI

[14]
MAO Danfeng, HE Dengfa, CHEN Jiajun. Geometry characteristics and genesis of No. 18 strike-slip faults in Shunnan area, Tarim Basin, SW China. Earth Science, 2023, 48(6): 2151-2167.

[15]
WANG Qinghua, YANG Haijun, WANG Rujun, et al. Discovery and exploration technology of fault-controlled large oil and gas fields of ultra-deep formation in strike slip fault zone in Tarim Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(4): 58-71.

[16]
ZHU Y F, ZHANG Y T, ZHAO X X, et al. The fault effects on the oil migration in the ultra-deep Fuman Oilfield of the Tarim Basin, NW China. Energies, 2022, 15(16): 5789.

DOI

[17]
WANG Qinghua, YANG Haijun, ZHANG Yintao, et al. Great discovery and its significance in the Ordovician in Well Fudong 1 in Fuman Oilfield, Tarim Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(1): 47-58.

DOI

[18]
YANG Debin, ZHU Guangyou, LIU Jiajun, et al. Distribution of global condensate gas field and major factors controlling its formation. Earth Science Frontiers, 2010, 17(1): 339-349.

[19]
YANG Haijun, ZHU Guangyou. The condensate gas field geological characteristics and its formation mechanism in Tarim Basin. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(9): 3233-3250.

[20]
ZHANG Shuichang, SU Jin, ZHANG Bin, et al. Genetic mechanism and controlling factors of deep marine light oil and condensate oil in Tarim Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(12): 1566-1580.

DOI

[21]
ZHU Guangyou, HU Jianfeng, CHEN Yongquan, et al. Geochemical characteristics and formation environment of source rock of the Lower Cambrian Yuertusi Formation in Well Luntan 1 in Tarim Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96(6): 2116-2130.

[22]
SU J, YANG H J, WANG X M, et al. The genesis of gas condensates and light oils in the Lower Paleozoic of Tarim Basin, NW China: The exploration implications for ultra-deep petroleum. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 219: 111032.

DOI

[23]
QUIGLEY T M, MACKENZIE A S. The temperatures of oil and gas formation in the sub-surface. Nature, 1988, 333(6173): 549-552.

DOI

[24]
MANGO F D. The stability of hydrocarbons under the time-temperature conditions of petroleum genesis. Nature, 1991, 352(6331): 146-148.

DOI

[25]
PEPPER A S, CORVI P J. Simple kinetic models of petroleum formation. Part I: Oil and gas generation from kerogen. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1995, 12(3): 291-319.

DOI

[26]
ZHAO Xianzheng, JIN Fengming, WANG Quan, et al. Niudong 1 ultra-deep and ultra-high temperature subtle buried hill field in Bohai Bay Basin: Discovery and significance. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(6): 915-927.

DOI

[27]
ZHAI Xiaoxian, GU Yi, QIAN Yixiong, et al. Geochemical characteristics of the Cambrian oil and gas in Well Tashen 1, the Tarim Basin. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2007, 29(4): 329-333.

[28]
MA Anlai. Kinetics of oil-cracking of different types of marine oils from Tahe Oilfield, Tarim Basin, NW China. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(6): 1120-1128.

[29]
ZHU G Y, MILKOV A V, CHEN F R, et al. Non-cracked oil in ultra-deep high-temperature reservoirs in the Tarim Basin, China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 89(Part 2): 252-262.

DOI

[30]
ZHU G Y, ZHANG Z Y, ZHOU X X, et al. The complexity, secondary geochemical process, genetic mechanism and distribution prediction of deep marine oil and gas in the Tarim Basin, China. Earth-Science Reviews, 2019, 198: 102930.

DOI

[31]
DENG Qian, ZHANG Haizu, WANG Haozhe, et al. Geochemical characteristics of the Cambrian light crude oil accumulation in Luntan 1 Well, Tarim Basin, NW China. Geochimica, 2023, 52(1): 20-28.

[32]
BEHAR F, VANDENBROUCKE M. Experimental determination of the rate constants of the n-C25 thermal cracking at 120, 400, and 800 bar:  Implications for high-pressure/high-temperature prospects. Energy & Fuels, 1996, 10(4): 932-940.

DOI

[33]
SCHENK H J, DI PRIMIO R, HORSFIELD B. The conversion of oil into gas in petroleum reservoirs. Part 1: Comparative kinetic investigation of gas generation from crude oils of lacustrine, marine and fluviodeltaic origin by programmed-temperature closed-system pyrolysis. Organic Geochemistry, 1997, 26(7/8): 467-481.

DOI

[34]
WAPLES D W. The kinetics of in-reservoir oil destruction and gas formation: Constraints from experimental and empirical data, and from thermodynamics. Organic Geochemistry, 2000, 31(6): 553-575.

DOI

[35]
LI Huili, MA Anlai, CAI Xunyu, et al. Kinetics of oil- cracking of ultra-deep Ordovician oil in the North Shuntuoguole area of Tarim Basin and its geological implications. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 818-825.

[36]
ZHANG Lijuan, LI Yong, ZHOU Chenggang, et al. Lithofacies paleogeographical characteristics and reef-shoal distribution during the Ordovician in the Tarim Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 2007, 28(6): 731-737.

[37]
TANG Liangjie, HUANG Taizhu, JIN Wenzheng, et al. Differential deformation and hydrocarbon accumulation in the superimposed basins. Earth Science Frontiers, 2009, 16(4): 13-22.

[38]
ZHANG Yuhang, TANG Liangjie, YUN Lu, et al. Unconformity characteristics and geological significance in key tectonic revolution stage of Tarim Basin. Global Geology, 2012, 31(2): 306-314.

[39]
ZHAO Mingsheng. The research about differences on type, migration and reservoir of reef flat body in platform edge during the Ordovician in Tarim Basin. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2014.

[40]
TIAN Jun, YANG Haijun, ZHU Yongfeng, et al. Geological conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation and key technologies for exploration and development in Fuman Oilfield, Tarim Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(8): 971-985.

DOI

[41]
ZHAO Yongqiang. The fourth-order sequence stratigraphic division and geological significance of Ordovician Yingshan Formation in Shunbei-Shunnan area, Tarim Basin, China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2022, 19(4): 454-467.

[42]
CHEN Honghan, WU You, ZHU Hongtao, et al. Eogenetic karstification and reservoir formation model of the Middle-Lower Ordovician in the northeast slope of Tazhong uplift, Tarim Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(10): 1231-1246.

DOI

[43]
PENG Jun, XIA Meng, CAO Fei, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of Ordovician Yingshan Formation and Yijianfang Formation in Shunbei-1 area, Tarim Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(2): 17-30.

[44]
BACETA J I, WRIGHT V P, BEAVINGTON-PENNEY S J, et al. Palaeohydrogeological control of palaeokarst macro-porosity genesis during a major sea-level lowstand: Danian of the Urbasa-Andia plateau, Navarra, North Spain. Sedimentary Geology, 2007, 199(3/4): 141-169.

DOI

[45]
CHEN Honghan, LU Ziye, CAO Zicheng, et al. Hydrothermal alteration of Ordovician reservoir in northeastern slope of Tazhong uplift, Tarim Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(1): 43-63.

DOI

[46]
QI Lixin. Characteristics and inspiration of ultra-deep fault-karst reservoir in the Shunbei area of the Tarim Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(1): 102-111.

DOI

[47]
DENG Xingliang, YAN Ting, ZHANG Yintao, et al. Characteristics and well location deployment ideas of strike-slip fault controlled carbonate oil and gas reservoirs: A case study of the Tarim Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(3): 21-29.

[48]
ZHANG Min, ZHANG Zhenghong, XIONG Yixue, et al. Formation mechanism and distribution of carbonate reservoirs in the 3rd-4th members of Ordovician Yingshan Formation on the northern slope of Tazhong Uplift. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(5): 636-646.

[49]
MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, YUN Lu, et al. Practice and theoretical and technical progress in exploration and development of Shunbei ultra-deep carbonate oil and gas field, Tarim Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(1): 1-17.

DOI

[50]
YANG Haijun, YU Shuang, ZHANG Haizu, et al. Geochemical characteristics of Lower Cambrian sources rocks from the deepest drilling of Well LT-1 and their significance to deep oil gas exploration of the Lower Paleozoic system in the Tarim Basin. Geochimica, 2020, 49(6): 666-682.

[51]
THOMPSON K F M. Hybrid gas condensates and the evolution of their volatile light hydrocarbons. Organic Geochemistry, 2016, 93: 32-50.

DOI

[52]
SHEN Ping, XU Yongchang, WANG Xianbin, et al. Studies on geochemical characteristics of gas-source rock and natural gas and mechanism of genesis of gas. Lanzhou: Gansu Science and Technology Press, 1991.

[53]
HUANG Difan, ZHAO Mengjun, LIU Baoquan, et al. Genetic types and maturity identification of natural gas in eastern Tarim Basin. SCIENCE CHINA Earth Sciences, 1996, 26(4): 365-372.

[54]
MA Anlai, HE Zhiliang, YUN Lu, et al. The geochemical characteristics and origin of Ordovician ultra-deep natural gas in the North Shuntuoguole area, Tarim Basin, NW China. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(7): 1047-1060.

[55]
ZHANG S C, SU J, WANG X M, et al. Geochemistry of Palaeozoic marine petroleum from the Tarim Basin, NW China: Part 3. Thermal cracking of liquid hydrocarbons and gas washing as the major mechanisms for deep gas condensate accumulations. Organic Geochemistry, 2011, 42(11): 1394-1410.

DOI

[56]
ZHANG S C, SU J, HUANG H P, et al. Genetic origin of sour gas condensates in the Paleozoic dolomite reservoirs of the Tazhong Uplift, Tarim Basin. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 68(Part A): 107-119.

DOI

[57]
WU Xian, LI Dan, HAN Jun, et al. Characteristics of present ultra-deep geothermal field in the northern Shuntuoguole low uplift, Tarim Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(1): 29-40.

DOI

[58]
YANG LYU, WU Guanghui, ZHU Yongfeng, et al. Key oil accumulation periods of ultra-deep fault-controlled oil reservoir in northern Tarim Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(2): 249-261.

[59]
CHAI Z, CHEN Z H, LIU H, et al. Light hydrocarbons and diamondoids of light oils in deep reservoirs of Shuntuoguole Low Uplift, Tarim Basin: Implication for the evaluation on thermal maturity, secondary alteration and source characteristics. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 117: 104388.

DOI

Outlines

/