Introduction
1. Samples and methods
Fig. 1. (a) Location of the study area; (b) predicted maturity distribution of Qingshankou shales; and (c) stratigraphic column of Qingshankou Formation. |
2. Classification and features of solid bitumen
2.1. Classification of solid bitumen
Table 1. Classification of solid bitumen |
| Source | SB type | SB property | Classification criterion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abraham [24⇓-26] | Ozocerite | Soluble in CS2 | Decreased fusibility: ozocerite, asphalt, gilsonite, and grahamite |
| Asphalt | |||
| Gilsonite | |||
| Grahamite | |||
| Ingramite albertite | Insoluble in CS2 | H/C atomic ratio greater than 1 | |
| Impsonite | H/C atomic ratio less than 1 | ||
| Jacob [10,27] | Solid bitumen | Soluble in CS2 | Ro≤0.7% |
| Pyrobitumen | Insoluble in CS2 | Ro>0.7% | |
| Curiale [28] | Pre-oil bitumen | In situ or short-distance migration | Ro<1.0% |
| Post-oil bitumen | Long-distance migration | Ro>1.0% | |
| Sanei [29] | Diagenetic SB | Dark gray under reflected light; weak or no fluorescence | Ro<0.5% |
| Initial-oil SB | Brown under reflected light; yellow fluorescence | 0.5%<Ro<0.7% | |
| Primary-oil SB | Gray under reflected light (filled fractures); no fluorescence | 0.7%<Ro<1.0% | |
| Late-oil SB | Gray under reflected light (in tighter pore network); no fluorescence | 1.0%<Ro<1.4% | |
| Pyrobitumen | Enhanced reflection under reflected light; no fluorescence | Ro>1.4% | |
| Misch et al. [2] | In-situ SB | No migration | |
| Migrated SB | Migration | ||
2.2. Optical properties of solid bitumen
Table 2. Petrologic features of SB and primary macerals of the Qing 1 Member shales in Songliao Basin |
| Evolution stage | SB | Bituminite | Alginite | Inertinite | Vitrinite | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-oil bitumen | Post-oil bitumen | Pyrobitumen | |||||
| Low-maturity to early oil generation stage | Reddish brown or black fluorescence, black to dark gray under reflected light, homogeneous, filling pores/ fractures occasionally | Light green to yellow fluorescence, dark gray and brown to black under reflected light, parallel to bedding planes, and mixing with mineral matrix | Yellow to dark yellow to yellowish orange fluorescence, brown under reflected light, lamellar aggregation or strip-like geometry, and parallel to bedding planes | No fluorescence, bright white under reflected light, angular or subangular, and cell structures | No fluorescence, gray under reflected light, the reflectance is between bituminite and inertinite, in the form of scattered particles | ||
| Early oil generation to peak oil generation stage | No fluorescence, dark gray to gray under reflected light, filling pores/ fractures, wrapping authigenic minerals | ||||||
| Peak oil generation to late oil generation stage | |||||||
| High-maturity stage | No fluorescence, light gray to bright white under reflected light, filling pores/ fractures, wrapping authigenic minerals | ||||||
Fig. 2. Microscopic characteristics of pre-oil bitumen, post-oil bitumen and pyrobitumen in the Qing 1 Member shales in Songliao Basin. (a) Well A21, 1625.90 m, Ro of 0.72%, in reflected light after oil immersion, pre-oil bitumen transforming from alginate, with the morphology of alginite; (b) Well A21, 1625.90 m, Ro of 0.72%, in fluorescent after oil immersion, pre-oil bitumen in black; (c) Well A544, 2278.50 m, Ro of 1.26%, in reflected light after oil immersion, post- oil bitumen network in the late oil generation stage; (d) Well A1, 2512.91 m, Ro of 1.56%, in reflected light after oil immersion, pyrobitumen in the high-maturity stage. |
Fig. 3. Primary maceral and solid bitumen in the Qing 1 Member shales in Songliao Basin (micrographs). (a) Well A2021, 1524.20 m, Ro of 0.63%, in reflected light after oil immersion, dark brown bituminite in contrast with gray pre-oil bitumen with surrounding associated pyrites; (b) Well A2021, 1524.20 m, Ro of 0.63%, in fluorescence after oil immersion, bituminite in light green, pre-oil bitumen with no fluorescence; (c) Well AS3, 1996.90 m, Ro of 0.80%, in reflected light after oil immersion, brown alginite in contrast with dark gray pre-oil bitumen; (d) Well AS3, 1996.90 m, Ro of 0.80%, in fluorescence after oil immersion, alginite in orange, pre-oil bitumen with no fluorescence; (e) Well A58, 2112.90 m, Ro of 1.16%, in reflected light after oil immersion, dark gray to bright white vitrinite in contrast with gray post-oil bitumen; (f) Well A544, 2234.50 m, Ro of 1.21%, in reflected light after oil immersion, bright white inertinite in contrast with gray post-oil bitumen. |
2.3. SEM features of solid bitumen
Fig. 4. SEM images of in-situ SB and migrated SB in the Qing 1 Member shales in Songliao Basin. (a) Well As3, 2049.50 m, Ro of 0.98%, OM-hosted pores in in-situ SB caused by devolatilization after hydrocarbon generation; (b) Enlarged view of the area in (a); (c) Well A58, 2052.40 m, Ro of 1.12%, flow textures; (d) Well A58, 2112.97 m, Ro of 1.16%, devolatilization crack; (e) Well A544, 2278.50 m, Ro of 1.26%, post-oil bitumen in harbor-like contact with authigenic quartz; (f) Well AY3, 2459.10 m, Ro of 1.4%, SB migrating into mineral pores and remaining at pore margins to form continuous OM network; (g) Well AY3, 2490.50 m, Ro of 1.43%, SB filling in mineral pores; (h) Well A1, 2547.70 m, Ro of 1.62%, spongy pores in pyrobitumen. |
3. Evolution of solid bitumen during thermal maturation
3.1. Solid bitumen evolution path
Fig. 5. Evolution of macerals with increasing thermal maturity of the Qing 1 Member shales in Songliao Basin. |
3.2. Solid bitumen indication of maturity
Table 3. Ro and Rob measurements of Qing 1 Member shale samples from the Songliao Basin |
| Sample No. | Depth/ m | Ro | Rob | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average/ % | Standard deviation/% | Number of measurement points | Average/ % | Standard deviation/% | Number of measurement points | ||
| 1 | 1146.6 | 0.61 | 0.09 | 22 | 0.35 | 0.07 | 20 |
| 2 | 1983.7 | 0.90 | 0.08 | 23 | 0.68 | 0.05 | 22 |
| 3 | 2011.2 | 1.10 | 0.02 | 20 | 0.97 | 0.09 | 24 |
| 4 | 2073.6 | 1.11 | 0.08 | 22 | 1.26 | 0.08 | 24 |
| 5 | 2235.8 | 1.41 | 0.09 | 24 | 1.56 | 0.06 | 22 |
| 6 | 2526.9 | 1.58 | 0.06 | 26 | 1.73 | 0.07 | 20 |
| 7 | 2587.1 | 1.77 | 0.08 | 21 | 2.09 | 0.07 | 20 |
Fig. 6. Rob vs. Roeq of shales in different regions. |
4. Effects of solid bitumen on shale reservoir space
Fig. 7. Total pore volume and OM porosity evolution in different regions (modified from Reference [51]). |
Fig. 8. SB-hosted pores of the Qing 1 Member shales in Songliao Basin. (a) Well AS3, 2049.50 m, Ro of 0.98%, modified mineral pores formed by short-distance OM migration into primary pores; (b) Well AS3, 2060.00 m, Ro of 1.01%, bubble pores generated by gas release; (c) Well AS3, 2060.01 m, Ro of 1.01%, pores filled with liquid hydrocarbons; (d) Well A58, 2112.90 m, Ro of 1.16%, cracks induced by devolatilization; (e) Well A1, 2504.20 m, Ro of 1.51%, spongy pores in pyrobitumen; (f) Well A1, 2558.80 m, Ro of 1.65%, spongy pores fusing together. |
Fig. 9. Relationship between SB and surrounding minerals of the Qing 1 Member shales in Songliao Basin. (a) Well AS3, 2060.00 m, Ro of 1.01%, OM-hosted pores supported by authigenic quartz; (b) Well A58, 2112.90 m, Ro of 1.16%, OM migrating into intercrystalline pores in pyrite; (c) Well A58, 2112.90 m, Ro of 1.16%, OM migrating into dissolved pores; (d) Well A21, 1669.90 m, Ro of 0.83%, SB migrating into intercrystalline pores in authigenic chlorite forming at the stage of early oil generation; (e) Well A544, 2278.50 m, Ro of 1.26%, authigenic chlorite forming at the stage of late oil generation filled in OM-hosted pores; (f) Well AS3, 2049.50 m, Ro of 0.98%, more bubble pores in OM-clay complexes than in single OM. |
Fig. 10. SB evolution path and OM porosity evolution model of the Qing 1 Member in Songliao Basin. |