Introduction
1. Geological characteristics
2. Development history
3. Principal development technology
3.1. Sweet-spot evaluation and selection technology
3.1.1. Selection of "sweet spots" in the planar section
Table 1. Comprehensive evaluation criteria for Chang 7 Member shale oil reservoirs in Qingcheng Oilfield |
| Category | Hydrocarbon generation intensity | Sedimentary characteristics | Oil-bearing capacity | Fluid properties | Fracability | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shale thickness/ m | Bottom shape of lake basin | Sedimentary mechanism | Sand body structure | Target layer thickness/ m | Poro- sity/% | Oil saturation/ % | Gas/oil ratio/ (m3·t-1) | Crude oil viscosity/ (mPa•s) | Shale brittleness index/% | |
| I | ≥15 | Slope foot zone | Sandy debris flow | Thick-layer multi- bed stacking | ≥10 | ≥10 | ≥55 | ≥100 | ≤1.5 | ≥45 |
| II1 | 10-15 | Slope foot zone+ Steep-slope zone | Sandy debris flow or turbidity currents | Thick sandstone and thin sand-mud interbedded type | 6-10 | 7-10 | 45-55 | 70-100 | 1.5-2.5 | 40-45 |
| II2 | 10-15 | Slope foot zone+ Steep-slope zone | Sandy debris flow or turbidity currents | Thin sand-mud interbedded type | 4-6 | <7 | 40-50 | 60-80 | 1.5-2.5 | <40 |
Fig. 1. Classification of Chang 71 shale oil reservoirs in Qincheng Oilfield. |
3.1.2. Selection of "sweet spots" in the vertical section
Fig. 2. Detailed interpretation for Well H6-1 in Chang 7 Member. |
3.1.3. Selection of "sweet spots" in the horizontal section
Fig. 3. Tracer test results for Well HH21-4. |
Table 2. Classification evaluation criteria for oil layers in the horizontal section |
| Region | Classification | GR/ API | Interval transit time/(μs·m-1) | Density/ (g·m-3) | True formation resistivity/(Ω·m) | Total hydrocarbon by gas logging/% | Minimum horizontal principal stress/MPa | Brittleness index/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | <90 | >215 | <2.51 | >50 | >10 | <30 | >50 | |
| X233 | A2 | <95 | 210-220 | 2.51-2.56 | 40-90 | 6-10 | 30-34 | 40-50 |
| B | <105 | 200-210 | 2.56-2.60 | 40-90 | 2-6 | >34 | <40 | |
| A1 | <95 | >215 | <2.51 | >90 | >10 | <30 | >50 | |
| Z183 | A2 | <100 | 205-215 | 2.51-2.55 | 50-200 | 6-10 | 30-34 | 40-50 |
| B | <105 | 200-205 | 2.55-2.60 | 50-200 | 2-6 | >34 | <40 |
3.2. Differentiated 3D well patterns
3.2.1. Optimization of well pattern parameters
3.2.1.1. Orientation of the horizontal section
3.2.1.2. Length of the horizontal section
Fig. 4. Correlation between drilling investment of different horizontal section lengths and single well production. |
3.2.1.3. Well spacing
Fig. 5. Relationship between recovery rate and economic limit well spacing per well. |
Fig. 6. Relationship between downhole fluid volume per single interval and effective fracture half-length. |
3.2.1.4. Intercalation thickness in 3D development well pattern
3.2.1.5. Number of wells deployed on the platform
3.2.2. Well patterns
Fig. 7. Well pattern for the Chang 7 Member shale oil reservoirs in the Ordos Basin. |
3.3. Rapid drilling and completion technology for large-cluster horizontal wells
3.3.1. Design of large-platform cluster wells
Fig. 8. Plane deployment diagram of the HH100 platform. |
3.3.2. Efficient drilling of long horizontal wells
Fig. 9. Technology roadmap for intelligent drill bit selection model. |
Fig. 10. Learning curve of horizontal well drilling with a 1500 m horizontal section in shale oil. |
3.3.3. High-strength and high-toughness cement slurry system
3.4. Intensively-staged volume fracturing technology
3.4.1. Characteristics of hydraulic fractures
3.4.2. Intensively-staged fracture design
Fig. 11. Simulation results of multi-cluster fracture propagation with different spacings. |
3.4.3. Efficient volume fracturing process
3.4.4. Cost reduction of tools and materials and economical optimization of parameters
Fig. 12. Flow conductivity requirements of fractures at different levels. |
3.5. Factory-like operation mode of large platform
3.5.1. "Three same directions" construction pattern
3.5.2. Factory-like of drilling and fracturing operation
3.5.3. Intelligent remote decision support system
3.5.4. Application examples of factory-like operations
3.6. Optimization technology for rational production systems
3.6.1. Soaking stage system
Fig. 13. Relationship between decline curve of wellhead pressure in horizontal wells and time. |
3.6.2. Liquid drainage system
Fig. 14. Critical flow rate for different number of fracture clusters and proppant particle sizes. |