RESEARCH PAPER

Distribution patterns of tight sandstone gas and shale gas

  • DAI Jinxing 1 ,
  • DONG Dazhong , 1, * ,
  • NI Yunyan 2 ,
  • GONG Deyu 1 ,
  • HUANG Shipeng 1 ,
  • HONG Feng 1 ,
  • ZHANG Yanling 1 ,
  • LIU Quanyou 3 ,
  • WU Xiaoqi 4 ,
  • FENG Ziqi 5
Expand
  • 1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
  • 2. China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
  • 3. Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • 4. Wuxi Institute of Petroleum Geology, Sinopec Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Wuxi 214126, China
  • 5. China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China

Received date: 2024-06-06

  Revised date: 2024-07-02

  Online published: 2024-08-15

Supported by

National Key R&D Project(2019YFC1805505)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(42272188)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(42172149)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(U2244209)

Science and Technology Special Project of China National Petroleum Corporation(2023YQX10101)

Petrochemical Joint Fund Integration Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China(U20B6001)

Shale Gas Academician Workstation Project of Guizhou Energy Industry Research Institute Co., Ltd.([2021] 45-2)

Abstract

Based on an elaboration of the resource potential and annual production of tight sandstone gas and shale gas in the United States and China, this paper reviews the researches on the distribution of tight sandstone gas and shale gas reservoirs, and analyzes the distribution characteristics and genetic types of tight sandstone gas reservoirs. In the United States, the proportion of tight sandstone gas in the total gas production declined from 20%-35% in 2008 to about 8% in 2023, and the shale gas production was 8 310×108 m3 in 2023, about 80% of the total gas production, in contrast to the range of 5%-17% during 2000-2008. In China, the proportion of tight sandstone gas in the total gas production increased from 16% in 2010 to 28% or higher in 2023. China began to produce shale gas in 2012, with the production reaching 250×108 m3 in 2023, about 11% of the total gas production of the country. The distribution of shale gas reservoirs is continuous. According to the fault presence, fault displacement and gas layer thickness, the continuous shale gas reservoirs can be divided into two types: continuity and intermittency. Most previous studies believed that both tight sandstone gas reservoirs and shale gas reservoirs are continuous, but this paper holds that the distribution of tight sandstone gas reservoirs is not continuous. According to the trap types, tight sandstone gas reservoirs can be divided into lithologic, anticlinal, and synclinal reservoirs. The tight sandstone gas is coal-derived in typical basins in China and Egypt, but oil-type gas in typical basins in the United States and Oman.

Cite this article

DAI Jinxing , DONG Dazhong , NI Yunyan , GONG Deyu , HUANG Shipeng , HONG Feng , ZHANG Yanling , LIU Quanyou , WU Xiaoqi , FENG Ziqi . Distribution patterns of tight sandstone gas and shale gas[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024 , 51(4) : 767 -779 . DOI: 10.1016/S1876-3804(24)60505-7

Introduction

With the discovery and large-scale development of unconventional natural gas such as tight sandstone gas (simplified as tight gas), coalbed methane, and shale gas, not only has the quantity of natural gas resources increased and the exploration and development methods of natural gas changed, but also profound changes have been made in the geological theory and the understanding of natural gas [1-10]. In 1821, shale gas was first discovered in the Devonian of the Appalachian Basin in the eastern United States. In 1920, guided by White's theory of anticline oil and gas reservoirs, tight sandstone gas was first discovered in the Lower Silurian of the Appalachian Basin. In 1927, the Blanco tight sandstone gas was discovered in the Upper Cretaceous of the San Juan Basin, and industrial exploitation was achieved in the 1950s [11]. The discovery of unconventional natural gas reservoirs has promoted the overall development of the entire oil and gas industry. Currently, the geological theory and technical system of unconventional natural gas have been basically formed, including unconventional natural gas geology, reservoir stimulation technology, etc. So far, most scholars be-lieve that shale gas and tight sandstone gas belong to unconventional natural gas, and there are various views on the accumulation and distribution patterns of shale gas and tight sandstone gas. There is a consensus that shale gas reservoirs are distributed continuously, while there are increasingly different views on whether tight sandstone gas reservoirs are distributed continuously. There are obvious issues worth discussing and discussing in terms of understanding. On the basis of elaborating on the potential and annual production of tight sandstone gas and shale gas resources in the United States and China, the authors systematically review the research history of the distribution of tight sandstone gas and shale gas reservoirs, analyze the distribution characteristics and genetic types of shale gas and tight sandstone gas reservoirs, in order to provide technical support for the exploration and development of shale gas and tight sandstone gas reservoirs.

1. Tight sandstone gas and shale gas becoming important areas for reserve growth

Tight sandstone gas and shale gas are the two main exploration and development fields in current natural gas resources, and will also be important storage targets for conventional natural gas resources for a considerable period in the future. The global tight sandstone gas resource is about 210×1012 m3, and the remaining technically recoverable resource is about 81×1012 m3 [12]. In 2013, the United States discovered over 900 tight sandstone gas fields in 23 oil and gas basins, with a recoverable resource of 13×1012 m3 and a remaining proven recoverable resource of over 5×1012 m3. The United States achieved continuous growth in tight sandstone gas reserves and production from the 1970s to the 1990s [13]. According to statistics, before 2008, the production of tight sandstone gas in the United States accounted for 20% to 35% of its total production. After 2008, with the rapid development of shale gas, the production of tight sandstone gas gradually decreased, currently accounting for only about 8% of its total natural gas production (Fig. 1a). Since 1973, driven by the strategy of energy independence, the United States has successfully completed the shale gas revolution, pushing shale gas exploration and extraction into a stage of rapid scale-development. The International Energy Agency (IEA) predicted in 2015 that the global shale gas technology recoverable resources were 220×10 12 m3, while the US shale gas technology recoverable resources were 18.8×1012 m3, ranking fourth in the world [14]. Since 2008, the United States has discovered shale gas in nearly 30 shale formations in major basins such as Appalachia, Fortwater, Williston, West Gulf of Mexico, Acoma, Louisiana, and Permia. According to statistics, from 2000 to 2008, the proportion of shale gas production in the United States to total gas production was 5% to 17%, and the annual shale gas production was (277-932)×108 m3. Since 2008, the proportion of shale gas production in the total production in the United States has jumped from 17% to 80%, and the annual shale gas production has rapidly increased from 932×108 m3 to 8 310×108 m3 [15] (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1. The tight gas and shale gas production over the years and their proportion in natural gas production in the United States (data from references [15-16]).
China has abundant resources of tight sandstone gas and shale gas, with a wide range of exploration and development fields. According to the statistics, the recoverable resources of tight sandstone gas, shale gas, and coalbed methane in China are 42.1×1012 m3, accounting for 50% of the total natural gas resources. In addition to the United States, China has achieved large-scale commercial development of tight sandstone gas and shale gas. In 1971, tight sandstone gas was discovered in Zhongba, Chuanxi Depression, Sichuan Basin. By 2010, the tight sandstone gas production had reached 160×108 m3 in China, accounting for over 16% of the total natural gas production of the country [16]. Presently, tight sandstone gas reservoirs discovered in China are distributed all over the onshore and offshore oil and gas-bearing basins, with three major tight sandstone gas production areas established in the Upper Paleozoic of the Ordos Basin, the Mesozoic of the Sichuan Basin and the Cenozoic of the Tarim Basin [17-19]. In 2023, the tight sandstone gas production was 650×108 m3 in China, accounting for more than 28% of the national natural gas production (Fig. 2a).
Fig. 2. The tight gas and shale gas production over the years and their proportion in natural gas production in China.
In 1965, gas-bearing shale formations were discovered in the Weiyuan area of the Sichuan Basin. In 2010, industrial shale gas production breakthrough was achieved in the Upper Ordovician Wufeng Fromation-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of the Weiyuan area in the Sichuan Basin. In 2012, China began producing shale gas. Marine shale gas has been discovered successively in the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation, Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation, Upper Ordovician Ulalike Formation, and Permian Wujiaping Formation in the Sichuan Basin, East and West Chongqing, North Yunnan, and the western edge of Ordos Basin. By the end of 2023, 9 shale gas fields from the marine Wufeng Formation to the Longmaxi Formation have been discovered and proven in the Sichuan Basin Qianbei region. A batch of shale gas-bearing areas have been discovered in the western edge of the Yichang and Ordos basins, with a cumulative proven shale gas initially-in-place of nearly 3.0×1012 m3. In 2023, shale gas production of 250×108 m3 has been achieved [20]. Among them, the largest shale gas field in China, Fuling shale gas field, has also become the largest shale gas field in the world except for North America. The cumulative proven gas initially-in-place is nearly 9 000×108 m3, and the cumulative production of shale gas has exceeded 600×108 m3. Currently, the annual production is about 100×108 m3. The Weiyuan shale gas field is the earliest discovered shale gas field in China, with a cumulative proven reserves of 4 600×108 m3 and a cumulative production of shale gas exceeding 300×108 m3. The annual production in 2023 is 40.58×108 m3. The Weirong shale gas field is the first deep shale gas field discovered in China with proven gas initially-in-place exceeding 100 billion cubic meters. The main production layer of the gas field is buried at a depth of over 3 700 m, and the confirmed shale gas initially-in-place has been submitted as 1 247×108 m3. The annual production of shale gas is about 10.0×108 m3. The Changning shale gas field was discovered in 2011 and is the first natural gas field on the outer edge of the Sichuan Basin. It has a cumulative proven reserves of 4 600×108m3 and a cumulative shale gas production of 100×108m3. The annual production in 2023 was 52.13×108m3. The Luzhou shale gas field is a trillion-cubic-meter deep to ultra-deep shale gas field discovered in China. The tested shale gas production of Well Lu 203 is 137.9×104 m3/d (approximately 1 099 t oil equivalent), and the proven geological reserves of shale gas are 5 138×108 m3 and the predicted geological reserves are 7 695×108 m3. The annual production in 2023 is 24.58×108 m3. The annual production of the Yuxi shale gas field is 10.87×108 m3. The Qijiang shale gas field is the first deep to ultra-deep large-scale shale gas field discovered in the complex structural zone at the basin edge of China, with a burial depth of 4 000 m to 5 000 m. The proven shale gas initially-in-place is 1 459.68×108 m3, and it is preliminarily confirmed that it has the potential to build a production capacity of 10×108 m3. The Sun shale gas field is a large, fully assembled shallow shale gas field with a main burial depth of less than 2 000 m. The proven gas initially-in-place is 1 359.5×108 m3, with a production capacity of 8.0×108 m3 built in 2020 and 6.07×108 m3 in 2023. Exploration has shown that the shale gas resources are abundant in China, with the characteristics of multi-layers and large-scale distribution of sweet spots. By the end of 2023, the cumulative shale gas production had exceeded 1 400×108 m3 [21], and the annual shale gas production accounts for more than 11% of the national natural gas production (Fig. 2b).

2. Research evolution of the distribution of tight sandstone gas and shale gas

2.1. The emergence of the concept of continuous accumulation of tight sandstone gas and shale gas

In the 1970s, American scholars classified tight sandstone gas, coalbed methane, and shale gas that were on the sub-economic and economic edge as unconventional gas. After the early concept of tight sandstone gas reservoirs, some scholars proposed concepts such as basin center gas reservoirs and continuous gas reservoirs [22-28]. Schmoker [2-3] and Gautier et al. [5] classified tight sandstone gas reservoirs as unconventional natural gas when evaluating unconventional natural gas resources and considered unconventional natural gas as a continuous reservoir formation. After Law et al. [10] formally proposed the concept of unconventional natural gas, they classified tight sandstone gas and tight carbonate gas with low porosity, low permeability, and high extraction difficulty as unconventional gas, and clearly pointed out that unconventional oil and gas are oil and gas resources that could not be developed using traditional technologies under existing economic conditions. Unconventional oil and gas can be subdivided into 9 types: heavy oil, tight oil, oil shale oil, oil sand oil, shale oil, tight gas, coalbed methane, shale gas, and hydrates. Among them, unconventional gas, tight gas, and shale gas are the main types.
China has also been involved in the study of unconventional oil and gas at an early stage and has noticed the continuous accumulation characteristics of reservoir formation [23-28]. Zou et al. [25] and Yang et al. [26] point out that unconventional oil and gas have two key indicators: (1) large-scale continuous distribution with unclear trap boundaries; (2) no natural production and not obvious Darcy seepage. The study of the distribution patterns of tight sandstone gas reservoirs and shale gas reservoirs suggests that both are continuous accumulation reservoirs. Jia et al. [27-28] pointed out that the basic geological characteristics of unconventional oil and gas reservoirs, mainly tight sandstone gas reservoirs and shale gas reservoirs, are as follows: (1) Continuous accumulation, large-scale distribution, without obvious oil, gas, and water trap interfaces; (2) Unconventional reservoirs are tight and have developed micro- and nano-scale pore throat systems, making them an artificial oil and gas reservoir; (3) The coexistence of unconventional oil and gas in various phases, including solid, liquid, gas, free, adsorbed, etc.; (4) Unconventional oil and gas are formed near source or intra-source enrichment, and near-source accumulation includes tight sandstone gas reservoirs. In summary, it can be concluded that in the early stages, both tight sandstone gas reservoirs and shale gas reservoirs were considered as continuous gas reservoirs.

2.2. Quasi-continuous or discontinuous distribution and trap accumulation of tight sandstone gas

Zhao [22] believes that unconventional oil and gas do not always accumulate in complete continuity. Some can be continuous, some quasi-continuous or discontinuous, forming reservoirs outside the source, accumulating near the source, and accumulating within the source. Shale gas and coalbed methane belong to continuous accumulation. Most tight sandstone gas reservoirs are discontinuous, with only a few appearing to be quasi-continuous. Kang's research [29-30] indicates that unconventional oil and gas are widely distributed continuously or quasi-continuously.
A large number of tight sandstone gas fields, such as Sulige, Daniudi, Guang'an, and Hechuan, discovered in the Carboniferous-Permian of the Ordos Basin and the Xujiahe Formation of the Triassic in the Sichuan Basin and the Lianggaoshan Formation of the Jurassic, exhibit the characteristics of non-continuous distribution of natural gas reservoirs in China [19,31]. There are three types of reservoirs: lithological, anticlinal, and syncline reservoirs. Jiao Fangzheng [32] clearly points out that unconventional oil and gas only include shale oil, shale gas, and coalbed methane. These types of oil and gas reservoirs have integrated sources and reservoirs and continuously accumulate in situ, while heavy oil, oil sands, tight oil, tight sandstone gas, and natural gas hydrates still belong to the conventional oil and gas category. Generally, they follow the mechanism of trap formation and accumulation process with respect to traditional petroleum geological theory, which means that these types of oil and gas reservoirs are discontinuous reservoir formations.

3. Shale gas reservoirs are continuous accumulation

Based on the researches of Schomoker et al. [2-3], Gautier et al. [5], Zou et al. [33-34], Jia et al. [35], Guo et al. [36], Dai et al. [19], and Sun et al. [37], it can be seen that shale gas in China and the United States are generated from continuous accumulation reservoirs (Figs. 3 and 4).
Figs. 3 and 4 show that the gas layers of shale gas reservoirs are characterized by typical continuous distribution, which is not controlled by structures. The key to determining a continuous distribution is that shale gas is characterized by an integration of source and reservoir. Shale gas source rocks are deposited in deeper reducing environments, remaining stable, with abundant organic matter conducive to preservation and with strong homogeneity, resulting in a high gas generation intensity. As a reservoir, the source rock is rich in organic matter and forms organic and inorganic pores, which guarantees the good conditions for shale gas continuous accumulation. For example, shale from the Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation to the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin has an average total organic carbon content of 1.52%, a gas generation intensity of (25-75)×108 m3/km2, and relatively developed organic matter pores [19].
Fig. 3. Section of continuous reservoir formations for Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation shale gas reservoirs in Sichuan Basin (modified from Reference [19]). O2—3—Middle - Upper Ordovician; O3w—Wufeng Formation; S1l—Longmaxi Formation; S1sn—Shiniulan Formation; S1x—Xiaoheba Formation; S2h—Hanjiadian Formation; P—Permian; T—Triassic.
Fig. 4. Cross section of Barnett shale gas reservoir in Fortwater Basin (modified from Reference [38]).
Shale gas can be classified into two categories based on whether it is cut by faults and the relationship between fault displacement and gas layer thickness: (1) Continuity: shale gas layers without developed faults, such as Weirong shale gas field (Fig. 3a) and Barnett shale gas reservoir (Fig. 4). The gas layer has developed faults, but the fault displacement is smaller than the thickness of the gas layer and does not damage the continuity of shale gas, i.e., the Changning shale gas field (Fig. 3b). (2) Intermittency: Shale gas layers are cut by faults with a displacement greater than the thickness of the gas layer, causing the shale gas layer to be interrupted and distributed in an intermittent manner, i.e., the Fuling shale gas field and the Taiyang shale gas field (Fig. 3c, 3d).

4. Trap types and distribution of tight sandstone gas reservoirs

At present, many scholars in the petroleum industry believe that tight sandstone gas reservoirs are continuous reservoirs, such as Schomoker [2-3], Gautier et al. [5], Nie et al. [21], Guan et al. [24], Zou et al. [33], Jia et al [35].
As is known to all, only reservoirs with uniform pore structures can accommodate uniformly continuous fluid. In geological engineering, sandstone with an effective permeability below 0.1×10-3 μm2 (absolute permeability less than 1×10-3 μm2) and a porosity less than 10% is called tight sandstone [39]. Tight sandstone is characterized by shallow water bodies and unstable sedimentary environments, with multiple sources and significant variations in particle size. The main tight sandstones in the Ordos Basin are the continental braided river delta deposits of the Lower Shihezi Formation in the Permian, with multiple sources of sand supply, strong heterogeneity, and complex pore throat microstructures [19]. Dai et al. [40] and Jiao [32] believe that tight sandstone gas reservoirs are discontinuous.
The gas reservoirs of 24 large tight sandstone gas fields in the Ordos Basin, Sichuan Basin and Tarim Basin [19] and some overseas [41-42] tight sandstone gas fields are not continuous. For example, in the middle of the Ordos Basin, the Upper Paleozoic tight sandstone gas reservoirs of Sulige Gas Field, Jingbian Gas Field, Yulin Gas Field and Shenmu Gas Field from west to east are not continuous [19] (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5. Section of tight sandstone gas reservoir in the Upper Paleozoic in Sulige gas field to Shenmu gas field in the central part of Ordos Basin (modified according to Reference [19]).
According to the trap types that control tight sandstone gas reservoirs, tight sandstone gas reservoirs can be divided into three types: lithological, anticlinal, and syncline.

4.1. Lithological tight sandstone gas reservoir

The tight sandstone gas reservoirs of the Upper Paleozoic in the Dongsheng gas field in the northern part of the Ordos Basin, the Mizhi gas field in the southern part, the Zizhou gas field, and the Daji gas field are lithological gas reservoirs (Fig. 6). In contrast, the tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Hechuan gas field in the Sichuan Basin are anticlinal tight sandstone gas reservoirs (Fig. 7a). Due to the formation of gas bearing tight sandstone lenses in both anticlines and synclines, they are actually lithological traps. Millson et al. [41] believe that the Barik Formation tight sandstone gas reservoir in the Kazan gas field of the Oman Ghaba Salt Basin is a stratigraphic structural gas reservoir, which is actually a lithological gas reservoir under the background of an anticline structure (Fig. 7b).
Fig. 6. Lithological gas reservoir sections of tight sandstone fields in the northern and eastern Upper Paleozoic of the Ordos Basin.
Fig. 7. Cross sections of lithological tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin of China and the Ghaba Salt Basin of Oman (Fig. 7b modified according to Reference [41]).
Lithological tight sandstone gas reservoirs are the main type of tight sandstone gas reservoirs, often formed in structurally stable basins and regions, such as the Ordos Basin and Sichuan Basin. The internal structure of the Yishan Slope in the Ordos Basin is gentle with few faults, and most of China's lithological tight sandstone gas reservoirs are distributed in the Central Sichuan Uplift in the Sichuan Basin [40].

4.2. Anticlinal tight sandstone gas reservoir

Dina 2 gas field, Kelasu gas field, Dabei gas field (Fig. 8) and Barik Formation tight sandstone gas reservoir (Fig. 7b) [41] in Kuqa depression of Tarim Basin, NW China are all anticlinal tight sandstone gas reservoirs.
Fig. 8. Cross sections of anticlinal tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Tarim Basin (modified according to Reference [19]). T—Triassic; J—Jurassic; K—Cretaceous; K1bx—Basigai Formation; K1bs—Bashkirchik Formation; E1-2km—Kumglimu Group; E2—3s—Suweiyi Formation; N1j—Jidi Formation; N1-2k—Kangcun Formation; N2k—Kuqa Formation.
Anticlinal tight sandstone gas reservoirs are often formed in basins and regions with tectonic activity. Due to the high horizontal pressure intensity, folds are often formed, which is favorable for the formation of anticlinal tight sandstone gas reservoirs. For example, Kuqa Depression in Tarim Basin is a foreland basin with active tectonic movement, forming a series of anticlinal tight sandstone gas reservoirs [40].

4.3. Synclinal tight sandstone gas reservoir

The tight sandstone gas reservoir in Liuyangpu, Ordos Basin [19], and the tight sandstone gas reservoir in the Mesayerde Formation of the Cretaceous in the Pishens Basin, United States [42] are formed in a syncline (Fig. 9). In 1921, Emmons pointed out that tight sandstone gas reservoirs "have a lot of accumulation in synclines" [43], while Masters [44] referred to tight sandstone gas distributed in the central part of the basin as deep basin gas. Chinese scholars also hold a similar view and believe that tight sandstone gas in the Upper Paleozoic of the Ordos Basin is deep basin gas [45-47].
Fig. 9. Cross sections of synclinal tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Liuyangpu in Ordos Basin and Mesayerde Formation in Piceance Basin.
Synclinal tight sandstone gas reservoirs, like anticlinal types, often form in structurally active basins and regions. Synclinal tight sandstone gas reservoirs (deep basin gas) in the United States are distributed in the Piceance Basin, San Juan Basin, and Denver Basin. However, the scale of the Liuyangpu syncline tight sandstone gas reservoir in the Ordos Basin is relatively small, located at the junction of the tectonic activity zone and the stable zone.

5. The genetic types of tight sandstone gas

According to the δ13C1—4 values of tight sandstone gas in the Ordos Basin, Sichuan Basin, Tarim Basin, Egypt's Obayied subbasin, Oman Jaba Salt Basin and the Appalachian Basin in the United States (Table 1), the δ13C1—3 values are put into the δ13C1-δ13C2-δ13C3 coal derived gas and oil-type gas identification diagram (Fig. 10). From Fig. 10, it can be seen that the tight sandstone gas in the three basins of China is all coal-derived gas. The tight sandstone gas in the Khatatba Formation of the Middle Jurassic in the Abayied sub-basin of Egypt is also mainly coal-derived gas. Its source rock is mainly coal-bearing shale, and the kerogen is a mixture of types II and III or Type III [48]. The main source of tight sandstone gas (deep basin gas) in the Rocky Mountains Basin group in the United States comes from Cretaceous coal seams and Type III kerogen mudstone with rich organic carbon content in coal measures [46,49]. Law [50] believes that the gas source of tight sandstone gas (deep basin gas) in the Dalu River Basin comes from coal seams and humic carbonaceous shale of the Lance, Almond, and Rock Springs formations of the Upper Cretaceous. From Fig. 10, it can be seen that the tight sandstone gas in the Barik Formation of the Oman Ghaba Salt Basin and the Clinton Medina Formation of the Silurian in the Appalachian Gas Field of the Appalachian Basin in the United States are oil-type gas [51-52].
Table 1. Gas compositions and carbon isotopic compositions of tight sandstone
Country Basin Gas field Well Layer Gas composition/% δ13C/‰ Type
CH4 C2H6 C3H8 C4H10 CO2 N2 CH4 C2H6 C3H8 C4H10 CO2
China Ordos Sugeli E58 P2x 89.60 3.93 0.82 0.15 0.07 4.64 −31.9 −23.6 −23.4 Coal-derived gas
Su172 P1s 94.12 3.02 0.50 0.07 0.06 2.08 −27.3 −23.0 −26.1
Tao5 P2x 90.90 4.69 0.83 0.23 0.76 2.10 −36.5 −23.2 −24.5 −22.3
Dongsheng J26 P2x 93.66 3.59 0.81 0.30 0.35 1.16 −32.0 −25.4 −24.8 −23.8 −9.9
J55 P1s 83.48 7.14 1.86 0.56 0.03 6.76 −36.2 −24.8 −26.4 −28.8
J66 P1x 88.27 7.28 2.36 1.02 0 0.18 -32.4 -26.3 -20.7
Ushenqi Zhao4 P2x 90.70 5.46 1.09 0.46 0.45 0.81 −31.3 −23.7 −23.0 −22.5
Zhaotan 1 O1m54—6 82.16 0.70 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.06 −37.5 −27.8 −24.3 −20.3
Shaan167 P2x 92.33 4.21 0.74 0.25 0.35 1.91 −33.8 −23.5 −23.4 −22.0
Daniudi D10 P1s2 81.15 4.01 0.85 0.59 1.12 9.71 −36.0 −24.0 −23.5
DP14 P1x1 87.91 8.07 2.32 0.77 0.42 0 −37.4 −25.7 −25.3
DK30 P1x3 94.36 3.88 0.80 0.28 0.42 0 −34.3 −25.9 −25.3
Yulin Shaan118 P1s2 92.60 4.32 0.93 0.30 1.04 0.23 −30.3 −24.0 −22.31 −21.7 −4.4
Yu 27-11 P1s2 92.47 4.24 0.91 0.33 1.64 0.24 −29.8 −25.2 −23.7 −22.8 −7.4
Yu 42-2 P1s2 94.03 3.28 0.52 0.15 1.65 0.29 −31.0 −25.5 −24.1 −22.5 −4.2
Shenmu Shen 24 P1t −31.5 −25.0 −23.2
Shuang 72 P1t −40.7 −25.6 −25.1 −25.8
Shen 26 P1s1 85.30 7.37 2.48 0.48 0.50 2.61 −35.8 −23.8 −24.1 −24.0
Linxing LX-105-2D P2x 95.28 2.77 0.74 0.19 0 0.87 −30.3
LX-101 P2x 97.14 1.17 0.20 0.09 0.03 1.32 −37.5 −27.1 −24.0
Zizhou Zhou 28-43 P1s 90.44 5.42 1.54 0.65 −30.2 −22.7 −22.2 −20.2
Zhou16-19 P1s 91.53 1.16 0.39 −34.5 −24.3 −21.7 −21.7
Zhou 25-38 P1s 94.67 2.87 0.42 0.13 1.40 0.38 −32.6 −25.7 −23.3 −22.9
Mizhi Qishen1 P2x −29.2 −22.4 −23.0
Mi10 P2s 96.14 1.96 0.39 0.14 0.60 0.62 −34.5 −27.5 −24.4 −23.9
Liuyangpu Dingbei 26 P1s2 92.89 1.61 0.24 0.03 4.22 0.99 −28.6 −24.2 −24.0
Liuping 4T P1t2 96.71 1.60 0.23 0 0.09 0.77 −30.6 −25.3 −28.0
Sichuan Xinchang XC134 J2s −32.7 −25.7 −23.6 −18.9
XC134-2 J2s 93.08 5.02 0.82 0.40 0.44 0.16 −36.7 −24.4 −23.4 −19.3 −11.3
X882 T3x4 93.41 3.78 0.93 0.46 0.46 0.85 −34.3 −23.1 −21.4 −20.0
Qiongxi QX14 T3x2 96.50 1.57 0.12 0.03 1.55 0.23 −30.5 −24.1 −23.8 −5.0
Pingluo2 J2s 93.55 4.01 0.57 0.20 0.02 1.62 −39.2 −25.5 −21.9 −21.2
Pingluo 3 T3x 97.14 1.98 0.24 0.08 0.06 0.50 −33.3 −21.7 −21.2 −20.3 −4.0
Hechuan Hechuan5 T3x2 88.75 5.25 0.98 0.47 0.19 3.79 −37.9 −24.9 −22.1 −21.6
Hechuan 1 T3x2 87.57 7.40 2.68 1.04 0.04 0.46 −42.8 −26.6 −22.7 −22.2
Tongnan101 T3x2 86.18 8.42 2.77 1.04 0.29 0.86 −42.0 −27.2 −24.7 −24.3 −8.7
Guang’an Guang’an 11 T3x6 −37.1 −27.4 −22.7 −23.6
Guang’an 14 T3x6 88.83 5.76 1.32 0.46 −42.0 −25.9 −21.7 −20.7
Guang’an 21 T3x4 88.98 6.16 2.51 1.17 0.29 0.40 −40.2 −27.6 −26.4 −24.6 −7.9
Bajiaochang Jiao 6 Jt4 −36.5 −26.0
Jiao33 T3x6 91.41 4.92 1.54 0.57 0.27 0 −39.5 −25.7 −24.4 −23.4 −9.8
Chengdu Mapeng 46 J3p 94.60 3.05 0.68 0.27 0.03 1.22 −31.1 −25.4 −21.0
Mapeng 13 J3p 93.53 4.14 0.92 0.33 0. 0.90 −33.5 −25.3 −19.4
Shifang10 J3p2 95.81 2.27 0.49 0.21 0.09 1.04 −32.1 −25.0 −22.5 −21.6
Zhongjiang JS21-6HF J2s −30.4 −25.3 −22.7
JS24-3H J2s −38.6 −26.2 −22.9
GS301 J2x −35.2 −24.3 −22.3
Luodai L75 J3p 89.69 5.98 1.85 0.77 0 1.24 −32.5 −23.7 −20.9 −20.0
LS24D J3sn 92.43 4.03 0.95 0.23 0 1.81 −36.3 −23.6 −19.6 −21.0
L7 J3p 93.82 3.12 0.63 0.15 0.12 1.81 −35.3 −23.7 −21.0 −20.0
Tarim Kelasu Keshen105 K1bs 95.94 0.47 0.03 0.01 2.36 1.14 −25.7 −13.8 Coal-derived gas
Bozi3 K1bs 86.64 6.53 1.65 0.36 0.26 3.11 −35.6 −25.1 −23.2 −22.9
Keshen 13 K1bs 94.00 1.77 0.22 0.10 1.14 2.15 −30.3 −18.5 −18.9
Dina2 DN204 E1−2km 86.90 7.40 0.92 0.62 0.89 2.95 −34 −23.1 −20.8 −20.4 −12.4
DN2 N1j 87.93 7.25 1.40 0.59 0.81 1.55 −36.9 −21.3 −24.4 −24.7 −15.7
DN202 E2—3s 88.28 7.27 1.54 0.62 0.45 1.49 −34.7 −23.3 −21.0 −21.1 −17.6
Dabei Dabei 104 K1bs 95.60 0.19 0.01 0.01 1.67 2.02 −26.7 −19.2
Dabei 1 K1bs 94.29 3.43 0.41 0.11 0.37 1.20 −33.1 −21.4
Dabei 2 K1bs 95.26 2.25 0.38 0.53 0.39 1.19 −30.8 −21.5 −19.8
Zhongqiu Zhongqiu 101 K1bs 90.93 4.73 1.00 0.39 0.76 1.70 −32.3 −20.3 −18.6 −20.3
Zhongqiu 1 K1bs −32.6 −22.3 −20.7 −20.6
Yudong Yudong 5 E 89.15 5.51 1.14 0.48 0.11 2.98 −33.1 −22.5 −20.7 −20.9
Yudong 1 E 89.95 5.51 1.14 0.46 0.1 2.18 −35.0 −22.5 −21.5 −22.6
Yudong 4 E 90.26 5.46 1.10 0.49 0.09 2.03 −33.5 −23.5 −21.1 −21.7
Country Basin Gas field Well Layer Gas composition/% δ13C/‰ Type
CH4 C2H6 C3H8 C4H10 CO2 N2 CH4 C2H6 C3H8 C4H10 CO2
China Tarim Kekeya Ke8001 N1x8 87.34 6.40 2.28 1.22 0.07 1.84 −34.2 −25.7 −23.2 −23.2 Coal-
derived gas
Ke18 N1x 84.05 8.99 1.93 0.73 3.98 −38.5 −26.4 −25.1
Ke7 N2x 79.46 9.65 3.05 1.40 0.22 5.61 −38.4 −26.3 −24.8 −26.0
Egypt Obayied
sub-basin
Oba2-2A 77.05 8.03 2.61 9.74 1.53 −38.2 −28.3 −26.3 Coal-
derived gas
Oba2-2C J2 73.80 8.90 4.10 7.90 1.18 −38.2 −28.3 −26.1
Oba4-1A 74.05 9.12 4.30 8.91 1.38 −38.3 −28.5 −25.9
Oba2-3 Khatatba 68.60 13.70 6.50 4.70 0.93 −43.7 −31.0 −26.5
ObaD16 73.60 8.20 4.00 7.50 1.00 −37.5 −27.8 −25.4
ObaD17 78.30 7.50 2.70 8.10 1.40 −37.0 −26.9 −24.7
ObaD17 78.20 7.40 2.70 8.10 0.78 −37.0 −26.9 −24.7
Oman Ghaba Salt Basin Khazzan MKM-1 −38.4 −29.0 −26.0 Oil-
type
gas
MKM-3 −38.4 −30.0 −26.5
KZN-1 −39.4 −31.0 −28.0
Saih Rawl SR-29 −42.3 −32.0 −30.0
USA Appalachia LSRA Patterson2 S 78.03 9.70 4.82 1.93 4.55 −42.0 −35.2 −32.34 −30.7 Oil-
type
gas
Bruno1 S 85.62 6.18 2.56 1.09 3.91 −39.2 −33.8 −31.1
G. Johnson2 S 88.10 5.30 2.16 1.08 2.63 −38.1 −34.6 −30.8 −29.5
Hissa2 S 76.38 10.98 6.07 3.07 2.01 −39.8 −35.2 −31.2
Detweiler1 S 88.17 5.58 1.93 0.79 3.04 −38.8 −35.1 −30.9
D. French2 S 87.48 5.59 2.12 0.96 3.24 −38.8 −35.3 −31.1
H. Griffin3 S 88.19 5.17 1.87 0.77 3.54 −38.8 −35.6 −31.3 −29.8
Clemens2 S 90.64 4.48 1.32 0.49 2.67 −37.4 −34.7 −30.4
Krantz2 S 89.34 5.11 1.65 0.62 2.84 −37.5 −35.3 −30.9
Governor1 S 90.33 4.64 1.47 0.58 2.50 −37.2 −34.9 −30.6
Oris8 S 89.94 4.58 1.35 0.58 3.08 −36.9 −35.3 −30.6
Gibson2l S 91.74 3.67 0.87 0.38 2.99 −35.6 −36.0 −30.7 −29.2
Brown5 S 94.36 2.37 0.15 0.039 2.92 −34.7 −39.8 −40.2
Velasaris1 S 94.25 2.26 0.14 0.032 3.17 −34.2 −41.1 −42.9 −38.9

Note: Data for Egypt according to Ref. [48]; Oman data according to Ref. [41]; USA data according to Ref. [52].

Fig. 10. Identification diagram of the origin of tight sandstone gas (modified according to Reference [51]).

6. Conclusions

Before 2008, tight sandstone gas in the United States accounted for 20% to 35% of the country’s total production, but by 2023, it only accounted for about 8% of the country’s production. From 2000 to 2008, shale gas in the United States accounted for 5% to 17% of the total production of the country, and by 2023, the production reached 8310×108 m3, accounting for about 80% of the total gas production of the country. In 2010, the tight sandstone gas production of China was 160×108 m3, accounting for over 16% of the country’s total natural gas production. In 2023, the production was 650×108 m3, accounting for over 28% of the country’s total natural gas production. In 2012, China began producing shale gas, and in 2023, the shale gas production was 250×108 m3 in China, accounting for approximately 11% of the country’s total natural gas production.
The distribution of shale gas reservoirs is continuous. According to the relationship between presence of faults, fault displacement and gas layer thickness in shale gas reservoirs, continuous shale gas reservoirs can be classified into continuity and intermittency. The distribution of tight sandstone gas reservoirs is not a continuous type of reservoir formation. They can be divided into three types according to the different types of traps that control the formation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs: lithological, anticlinal, and synclinal.
The key to determining the continuous distribution is that shale gas reservoirs are characterized by the integration of source and reservoir, with deep sedimentary water in the source rock, stable and in a reducing environment, rich in organic matter, and uniform storage spaces for organic and inorganic matter pores. Tight sandstone reservoirs are non-uniform reservoirs, therefore they cannot form continuous gas reservoirs.
The tight sandstone gas in the Ordos Basin, Sichuan Basin, Tarim Basin of China and the Obayied subbasin of Egypt is coal-derived gas, while the tight sandstone gas in America's Appalachian Basin and Oman Jaba Salt Basin is oil-type gas.
[1]
Baidu Baike. Unconventional gas. [2024-05-23]. https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E9%9D%9E%E5%B8%B8%E8%A7%84%E5%A4%A9%E7%84%B6%E6%B0%94/2104713?fr=ge_ala.

[2]
SCHMOKER J W. Continuous hydrocarbon reservoirs: Fact sheet 024-97. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey, 1997.

[3]
SCHMOKER J W. Method for assessing continuous-type (unconventional) hydrocarbon accumulation. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey, 1995.

[4]
SCHMOKER J W. U.S. Geological Survey assessment model for continuous (unconventional) oil and gas accumulations; the “FORSPAN” model: Bulletin 2168. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, 1999: 1-9.

[5]
GAUTIER D L, DOLTON G L, TAKAHASHI K I, et al. 1995 National assessment of united states oil and gas resources; results, methodology, and supporting data: Data series 30. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey, 1995.

[6]
CHENG K, WU W, HOLDITCH S A, et al. Assessment of the distribution of technically-recoverable resources in North American basins. SPE 137599-MS, 2010.

[7]
ETHERINGTON J R, MCDONALD I R. Is bitumen a petroleum reserve?. SPE 90242-MS, 2004.

[8]
SINGH K, HOLDITCH S A, AYERS W B, Jr. Basin analog investigations answer characterization challenges of unconventional gas potential in frontier basins. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2008, 130(4): 43202.

[9]
OLD S, HOLDITCH S A, AYERS W B, et al. PRISE: Petroleum resource investigation summary and evaluation. SPE 117703-MS, 2008.

[10]
LAW B E, CURTIS J B. Introduction to unconventional petroleum systems. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11): 1851-1852.

[11]
WEI Xinshan, HU Aiping, ZHAO Huitao, et al. New geological understanding of tight sandstone gas. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017, 29(1): 11-20.

[12]
JIA Ailin, WEI Yunsheng, GUO Zhi, et al. Development status and prospect of tight sandstone gas in China. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(1): 83-92.

[13]
ASAKAWA T. Outlook for unconventional natural gas resources. Journal of the Japanese Association for Petroleum Technology, 1995, 60(2): 128-135.

[14]
EIA. Drilling productivity report: For key tight oil and shale gas regions. Washington, D.C.: EIA Independent Statistics & Analysis, 2015.

[15]
EIA. Drilling productivity report:For key tight oil and shale gas regions. (2024-05-13)[2024-05-25]. https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/.

[16]
YU Xinghe, LI Shunli, YANG Zhihao. Discussion on deposition-diagenesis genetic mechanism and hot issues of tight sandstone gas reservoir. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(1): 1-13.

[17]
WANG Weidong, PENG Jun, DUAN Guanyi, et al. Development and tendency of the research of tight sandstone gas reservoirs. Petroleum Geophysics, 2012, 10(4): 33-38.

[18]
YANG Zhi, ZOU Caineng, FU Jinhua, et al. Characteristics and “sweet area (section)” evaluation of continuous tight & shale oil and gas in Ordos Basin, north-central China. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2019, 41(4): 459-474.

[19]
DAI Jinxing, DONG Dazhong, QIN Shengfei, et al. Giant gas fields and gas sources in China. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2024.

[20]
ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, XIONG Wei, et al. Advances, challenges, and countermeasures in shale gas exploration of underexplored plays, sequences and new types in China. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(2): 309-326.

[21]
NIE Haikuan, DANG Wei, ZHANG Ke, et al. Two decades of shale gas research & development in China: Review and prospects. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(3): 20-52.

[22]
ZHAO Jingzhou. Conception, classification and resource potential of unconventional hydrocarbons. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(3): 393-406.

[23]
ZHANG Wenda, XIONG Shousheng. More attention should be paid to the research and survey of unconventional petroleum resources. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 1982, 4(2): 109-112.

[24]
GUAN Deshi, NIU Jiayu, Guo Lina, et al. Unconventional oil and gas geology in China. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1995.

[25]
ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, WU Songtao, et al. Types, characteristics, genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations: Taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 173-187.

[26]
YANG Zhi, ZOU Caineng. Orderly “symbiotic enrichment” of conventional & unconventional oil and gas——discussion on theory and technology of conventional & unconventional petroleum geology. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96(5): 1635-1653.

[27]
JIA Chengzao, ZHENG Min, ZHANG Yongfeng. Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2): 129-136.

[28]
JIA Chengzao, PANG Xiongqi, SONG Yan. The mechanism of unconventional hydrocarbon formation: Hydrocarbon self-containment and intermolecular forces. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(3): 437-452.

[29]
KANG Yuzhu. Significant exploration progress and resource potential of unconventional oil and gas in China. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum, 2018, 37(4): 1-7.

[30]
KANG Yuzhu, ZHANG Dawei, ZHAO Xianliang, et al. Unconventional oil and gas geology in China. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2015: 1-231.

[31]
LI Yueqing. Future direction of unconventional oil and gas development in China: Interview with Dai Jinxing, academician of Chinese academy of sciences and a famous expert in oil and gas geology and geochemistry. China Petroleum Enterprise, 2014(S1): 78-81.

[32]
JIAO Fangzheng. Re-recognition of “unconventional” in unconventional oil and gas. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(5): 803-810.

[33]
ZOU Caineng, TAO Shizhen, HOU Lianhua, et al. Unconventional petroleum geology. 2nd ed. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2013.

[34]
ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, DONG Dazhong, et al. Formation, distribution and prospect of unconventional hydrocarbons in source rock strata in China. Editorial Committee of Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2022, 47(5): 1517-1533.

[35]
JIA Chengzao, ZHENG Min, ZHANG Yongfeng. Four important theoretical issues of unconventional petroleum geology. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(1): 1-10.

DOI

[36]
GUO Tonglou, ZHANG Hanrong. Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale gas field, Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(1): 28-36.

[37]
SUN Zandong, JIA Chengzao, LI Xiangfang, et al. Unconventional oil & gas exploration and development. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2011: 3-85.

[38]
POLLASTRO R M, JARVIE D M, HILL R J, et al. Geologic framework of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Barnett-Paleozoic total petroleum system, Bend arch-Fort Worth Basin, Texas. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4): 405-436.

[39]
DAI Jinxing, NI Yunyan, WU Xiaoqi. Tight gas in China and its significance in exploration and exploitation. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3): 257-264.

[40]
DAI Jinxing, LI Jian, LIU Dan. Giant coal derived gas fields and their gas sources in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2014: 306-320.

[41]
MILLSON J A, QUIN J G, IDIZ E, et al. The Khazzan gas accumulation, a giant combination trap in the Cambrian Barik Sandstone Member, Sultanate of Oman: Implications for Cambrian petroleum systems and reservoirs. AAPG Bulletin, 2008, 92(7): 885-917.

[42]
YUREWICZ D A, BOHACS K M, KENDALL J, et al. Controls on gas and water distribution, Mesaverde Basin- centered gas play, Piceance Basin, Colorado: CUMELLA S P, SHANLEY K W, CAMP W K. Understanding, Exploring, and Developing Tight-gas Sands. Tulsa: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 2008: 105-136.

[43]
EMMONS W H. Geology of petroleum. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1921.

[44]
MASTERS J A. Deep basin gas trap, western Canada. AAPG Bulletin, 1979, 63(2): 152-181.

[45]
WANG Tao. Deep basin gas fields in China. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2002: 3-39, 75-174.

[46]
ZHANG Jinliang, CHANG Xiangchun. Geological theory and gas field of deep basin gas. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2002: 47-94.

[47]
MIN Qi, YANG Hua, FU Jinhua. Deep basin gas in the Ordos Basin: FU Chengde. Deep Basin Gas Accumulation in Ordos Basin. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2001: 15-20.

[48]
HASSAN M, LEILA M, AHMED M, et al. Geochemical characteristics of natural gases and source rocks in Obayied sub-basin, North Western Desert, Egypt: Implications for gas-source correlation. Acta Geochimica, 2023, 42(2): 241-255.

[49]
TONG Xiaoguang, GUO Bincheng, LI Jianzhong, et al. Comparison study on accumulation & distribution of tight sandstone gas between China and the United States and its significance. Strategic Study of CAE, 2012, 14(6): 9-15.

[50]
LAW B E. Relationships of Source Rock, Thermal Maturity, and Overpressuring to Gas Generation and Occurrence in Low-Permeability Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary Rocks. Greater Green River Basin, Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah: Abstract. AAPG Bulletin, 1984, 68(7): 940.

[51]
DAI Jinxing, NI Yunyan, HUANG Shipeng, et al. Significant function of coal-derived gas study for natural gas industry development in China. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(1): 1-22.

[52]
BURRUSS R C, LAUGHREY C D. Carbon and hydrogen isotopic reversals in deep basin gas: Evidence for limits to the stability of hydrocarbons. Organic Geochemistry, 2010, 41(12): 1285-1296.

Outlines

/