Introduction
1. Geological setting
Fig. 1. Composite stratigraphic column of Well Zi 201 (modified from Reference [17]). GR—Gamma ray; Δt—interval transit time; ϕCNL—Neutron porosity; ρ—Density; Rlld—Deep lateral resistivity; TOC—Total organic carbon content. |
2. The aulacogen-uplift enrichment pattern in the Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation
2.1. The Deyang-Anyue aulacogen controls the development of organic-rich shale
2.1.1. Aulacogen as the center of fine-grained sedimentation in the Qiongzhusi Formation
Fig. 2. Thickness distribution of the Dengying, Maidiping, and Qiongzhusi Formations in the Sichuan Basin. |
Fig. 3. Seismic section and interpretation of the Deyang-Anyue aulacogen (section location shown in |
Fig. 4. North-south (a) and east-west (b) well-tie sections showing the formation thicknesses in the Deyang-Anyue aulacogen ( |
2.1.2. Aulacogen as the most favorable facies zone for black shale deposition in the Qiongzhusi Formation
Fig. 5. Paleo-topography and sedimentary microfacies of layer 5 of the Qiongzhusi Formation. |
Fig. 6. Characteristics of the Qiongzhusi Formation shale in different geomorphic units in the study area. (a) Well Jinshi 103, 3 463.97 m, highland outside the aulacogen, core, gray silty shale; (b) Well Weiye 1H, 4 320.78 m, slope at the aulacogen margin, core, dark gray shale; (c) Well Zi 201, 4 606.10 m, center of the aulacogen, core, black shale; (d) Well Jinshi 103, 3 463.97 m, highland outside the aulacogen, thin section, silt-sized grains in dominance, plane-polarized light; (e) Well Weiye 1H, 4 320.98 m, thin section, mud-silt-sized grains in dominance, plane-polarized light; (f) Well Zi 201, 4 606.10 m, thin section, mud-sized grains in dominance, plane-polarized light. |
Fig. 7. Well-tie section of strong reducing intervals in the central part of the Deyang-Anyue aulacogen (section location shown in |
2.2. The Leshan-Longnüsi paleouplift delays the thermal maturation of shale
Fig. 8. Paleo-structural map of the Leshan-Longnüsi paleouplift in the Sichuan Basin prior to the Permian [17]. |
2.2.1. Relatively low thermal maturity of the Qiongzhusi Formation shale in the paleouplift area
Fig. 9. Laser Raman spectroscopy results for the Qiongzhusi Formation (well locations shown in |
2.2.2. High resistivity characteristic of gas-bearing interval in shallow, low-maturity shale in the paleouplift area
Fig. 10. Relationship between resistivity and burial depth of layer 5 in the Qiongzhusi Formation, Sichuan Basin. |
2.3. Aulacogen and paleouplift jointly control shale gas enrichment
2.3.1. Generation and enrichment evolution of the Qiongzhusi Formation shale gas under the aulacogen - uplift setting
Fig. 11. Evolutionary processes and model diagram for hydrocarbon enrichment in the Qiongzhusi Formation. Z2d—Sinian Dengying Formation; —C1m—Cambrian Maidiping Formation; —C1q—Qiongzhusi Formation; —C1c—Cambrian Canglangpu Formation; O3l—Ordovician Linxiang Formation; O3w—Ordovician Wufeng Formation; S—Silurian; P1—Lower Permian; P2—Upper Permian; T1f—Triassic Feixianguan Formation; T1j—Triassic Jialingjiang Formation; T2l—Triassic Leikoupo Formation; T3x—Triassic Xujiahe Formation; J—Jurassic; K—Cretaceous). |
2.3.2. Joint control of aulacogen-uplift on reservoir development
Fig. 12. Diagenetic differences inside and outside the aulacogen-uplift overlap area. (a) Well Zhongjiang 2, inside the overlap area, layer 5, SEM; (b) Well Gaoshi 17, inside the overlap area, layer 5, SEM; (c) Well Wei 201, at the edge of the overlap area, layer 5, SEM; (d) Well Ning 208, outside the overlap area, layer 5, SEM. |
Table 1. Log-interpreted reservoir parameters of layer 5 of the Qiongzhusi Formation in the Sichuan Basin |
| Structural location | Well | TOC/% | Porosity/% | Total gas content/(m3∙t-1) | Gas saturation/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Along the axis of the aulacogen | Inside the overlap area | Detan 1 | 2.00 | 3.67 | 5.00 | 56.95 |
| Zhongjiang 2 | 3.00 | 3.43 | 2.97 | 51.39 | ||
| Shitan 1 | 2.80 | 3.99 | 7.29 | 73.02 | ||
| Ziyang 1 | 2.70 | 4.39 | 7.49 | 71.35 | ||
| Zi 201 | 2.80 | 4.57 | 7.54 | 74.03 | ||
| Gaoshi 17 | 2.60 | 4.68 | 8.23 | 72.75 | ||
| Outside the overlap area | Rongchang 1 | 4.20 | 3.26 | 1.89 | 35.00 | |
| Desheng 1 | 2.70 | 3.15 | 1.77 | 25.00 | ||
| Zhao 103 | 2.00 | 3.64 | 1.69 | 54.87 | ||
| Along the axis of the paleouplift | Inside the overlap area | Wei 201 | 2.90 | 1.90 | 2.42 | 75.79 |
| Wei 207 | 2.50 | 3.33 | 4.49 | 74.65 | ||
| Songtan 1 | 2.30 | 3.39 | 5.28 | 76.33 | ||
| Ziyang 1 | 2.70 | 4.39 | 7.49 | 71.35 | ||
| Zi 201 | 2.80 | 4.57 | 7.54 | 74.03 | ||
| Gaoshi 17 | 2.60 | 4.68 | 8.23 | 72.75 | ||
| Outside the overlap area | Gaoshi 1 | 1.90 | 2.47 | 2.22 | 69.84 | |
| Moxi 9 | 2.10 | 3.87 | 6.94 | 73.68 | ||
| Outside of the aulacogen and paleouplift | Wutan 1 | 2.30 | ||||
| Loutan 1 | 2.80 | |||||
| Yingtan 1 | 2.80 | |||||
Note: The structural locations of wells are shown in |
2.3.3. Good preservation conditions of the Qiongzhusi Formation shale gas in the aulacogen-uplift overlap area
Fig. 13. Total gas content in representative wells. |
3. Prospects of shale gas exploration
3.1. Prediction of favorable exploration targets
3.1.1. Division of favorable zones
Fig. 14. Division of favorable zones in the Qiongzhusi Formation of the Sichuan Basin. |
3.1.2. Division and evaluation of sweetspot zones
Fig. 15. Sweespot zone evaluation for layer 5 of the Qiongzhusi Formation in the Deyang-An’yue aulacogen. |