OIL AND GAS FIELD DEVELOPMENT

A quantitative evaluation for well pattern adaptability in ultra-low permeability oil reservoirs: A case study of Triassic Chang 6 and Chang 8 reservoirs in Ordos Basin

  • ZHAO Jiyong ,
  • AN Xiaoping ,
  • WANG Jing ,
  • FAN Jianming ,
  • KANG Xingmei ,
  • TAN Xiqun ,
  • LI Wenqing
Expand
  • 1. Exploration and Development Research Institute of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi’an 710018, China;
    2. National Engineering Laboratory for Exploration and Development of Low-permeability Oil & Gas Fields, Xi’an 710018, China;

Received date: 2018-01-19

  Revised date: 2018-04-11

  Online published: 2018-04-19

Abstract

Based on the previous studies and development practice in recent 10 years, a quantitative evaluation method for the adaptability of well patterns to ultra-low permeability reservoirs was established using cluster analysis and gray correlation method, and it includes 10 evaluation parameters in the four aspects of optimal evaluation parameters, determination of weights for evaluation parameters, development stage division, and determination of classification coefficients. This evaluation method was used to evaluate the well pattern adaptability of 13 main ultra-low permeability reservoirs in Triassic Chang 6 and Chang 8 of Ordos Basin. Three basic understandings were obtained: Firstly, the well pattern for ultra-low permeability type-I reservoirs has generally good adaptability, with proper well pattern forms and well pattern parameters. Secondly, square inverted nine-spot well pattern is suitable for reservoirs with no fractures; rhombic inverted nine-spot injection pattern is suitable for reservoirs with some fractures; and rectangular well pattern is suitable for reservoirs with rich fractures. Thirdly, for the ultra-low permeability type-Ⅱ and type-Ⅲ reservoirs, with the principles of well pattern form determination, the row spacing needs to be optimized further to improve the level of development of such reservoirs.

Cite this article

ZHAO Jiyong , AN Xiaoping , WANG Jing , FAN Jianming , KANG Xingmei , TAN Xiqun , LI Wenqing . A quantitative evaluation for well pattern adaptability in ultra-low permeability oil reservoirs: A case study of Triassic Chang 6 and Chang 8 reservoirs in Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018 , 45(3) : 482 -488 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2018.03.13

References

1 李芳玉, 程时清, 雷启鸿, 等. 特低渗透油藏水平井开发效果评价指标和分类评价方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2017, 36(1): 56-60.
LI Fangyu, CHENG Shiqing, LEI Qihong, et al.Evaluating indexes and classifying-evaluating methods of the developed effects for the horizontal well in ultra-low permeability oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2017, 36(1): 56-60.
2 苗厚纯, 于开春, 李琦, 等. 基于地质分类进行水驱开发效果评价[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2016, 46(7): 264-274.
MIAO Houchun, YU Kaichun, LI Qi, et al.Evaluation about oil field development effect based on geological classification[J]. Mathematic in Practice and Theory, 2016, 46(7): 264-274.
3 王敬瑶, 马德胜, 李军, 等. 低渗透油藏超前注水开发井网适应性分析[J]. 西南石油学院学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(2): 125-128.
WANG Jingyao, MA Desheng, LI Jun, et al.Analysis of adaptability of well network to advanced water injection in low permeable reservoir[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2001, 33(2): 125-128.
4 张继风. 水驱油田开发效果评价方法综述及发展趋势[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(3): 118-122.
ZHANG Jifeng.Evaluation methods of development effect for water drive oilfield and development trend[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(3): 118-122.
5 耿文爽, 杨二龙, 宋考平. 基于模糊综合评判的宋芳屯油田南部水驱开发效果综合评价[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2014, 44(6): 76-80.
GENG Wenshuang, YANG Erlong, SONG Kaoping.Integrated evaluation of waterflooding development effect in south Songfangtun oilfield based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Mathematic in Practice and Theory, 2014, 44(6): 76-80.
6 宋子齐, 赵磊, 康立明, 等. 一种水驱开发地质潜力综合评价方法在辽河油田的应用[J]. 断块油气田, 2004, 11(2): 32-37.
SONG Ziqi, ZHAO Lei, KANG Liming, et al.An applicaion of evaluation for water-drive geologic potential in Liaohe Oilfield[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2004, 11(2): 32-37.
7 徐宏龙, 刘建, 乔诚, 等. 灰色关联分析法在双河油田储层评价中的应用[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2015, 5(5): 17-21.
XU Honglong, LIU Jian, QIAO Cheng, et al.Application of gray correlative analysis method to reservoir evaluation of Shuanghe oilfield[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2015, 5(5): 17-21.
8 中国石油天然气总公司. 油田开发水平分级: SY/T 6219—1996[S]. 北京: 中国石油天然气总公司, 1996.
China National Petroleum Corporation. Classification of oil field development level: SY/T 6219—1996[S]. Beijing: China National Petroleum Corporation, 1996.
9 唐俊, 王琪, 马晓峰, 等. Q型聚类分析和判别分析法在储层评价中的应用: 以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长81储层为例[J]. 特种油气藏, 2012, 19(6): 28-31.
TANG Jun, WANG Qi, MA Xiaofeng, et al.Application of Q-type cluster analysis and discriminatory analysis in reservoir evaluation: Taking reservoir Chang 81 of Jiyuan Area in Ordos Basin as an example[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2012, 19(6): 28-31.
10 郭少斌, 黄磊. 页岩气储层含气性影响因素及储层评价: 以上扬子古生界页岩气储层为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2013, 35(6): 601-606.
GUO Shaobin, HUANG Lei.Gas-bearing influential factors and evaluation of shale gas reservoir: A case study of Paleozoic shale gas reservoir in Upper Yangtze region[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013, 35(6): 601-606.
11 梁涛, 常毓文, 郭晓飞, 等. 巴肯致密油藏单井产能参数影响程度排序[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(3): 357-362.
LIANG Tao, CHANG Yuwen, GUO Xiaofei, et al.Influence factors of single well’s productivity in the Bakken tight oil reservoir[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(3): 357-362.
12 中国石油天然气股份有限公司长庆油田公司. 长庆油田不同类型油藏开发水平分类分级技术规范: Q/SY—2016[S]. 西安: 中国石油天然气股份有限公司长庆油田公司, 2016.
Petrochina Changqing Oilfield Company. Classification of different types of reservoirs in Changqing Oilfield: Q/SY—2016[S]. Xi’an: PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, 2016.
13 中国石油天然气股份有限公司规划总院. 中国石油天然气集团公司建设项目经济评价参数(2016)[M]. 北京: 中国石油规划总院, 2016: 1-72.
PetroChina Planning and Engineering Institute. Economic evaluation parameters of China national petroleum corporation construction project(2016)[M]. Beijing: PetroChina Planning and Engineering Institute, 2016: 1-72.
14 王文环, 彭缓缓, 李光泉, 等. 长庆特低渗透油藏注水动态裂缝及井网加密调整模式研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2015, 43(1): 106-110.
WANG Wenhuan, PENG Huanhuan, LI Guangquan, et al.Research on water flooding dynamic fractures to optimize infill drilling spacing in ultra-low permeability reservoirs, Changqing Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(1): 106-110.
15 肖前华, 杨正明, 徐轩, 等. 特低渗透砂岩平板大模型井网适应性评价[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2013, 36(9): 28-34, 51.
XIAO Qianhua, YANG Zhengming, XU Xuan, et al.Experimental study on adaptability of well pattern using sandstone plate model with ultra-low permeability[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2013, 36(9): 28-34, 51.
16 任大忠, 孙卫, 赵继勇, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地岩性油藏微观水驱油特征及影响因素[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2015, 44(6): 1043-1052.
REN Dazhong, SUN Wei, ZHAO Jiyong, et al.Microscopic waterflooding characteristics of lithologic reservoirs in Ordos basin and its influenc factors[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2015, 44(6): 1043-1052.
17 史成恩, 万晓龙, 赵继勇, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地超低渗透油层开发特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 34(5): 538-542.
SHI Chengen, WAN Xiaolong, ZHAO Jiyong, et al.Development characteristics of super-low permeability oil layers in Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2007, 34(5): 538-542.
18 樊建明, 屈雪峰, 王冲, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密储集层天然裂缝分布特征及有效裂缝预测新方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(5): 740-748.
FAN Jianming, QU Xuefeng, WANG Chong, et al.Natural fracture distribution and a new method predicting effective fractures in tight oil reservoirs of Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(5): 740-748.
19 张忠义, 陈世加, 杨华, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7段致密油成藏机理[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(4): 590-599.
ZHANG Zhongyi, CHEN Shijia, YANG Hua, et al.Tight oil accumulation mechanisms of Triassic Yanchang Formation Chang 7 Member, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(4): 590-599.
20 杨秋莲, 李爱琴, 孙燕妮, 等. 超低渗储层分类方法探讨[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(4): 51-56.
YANG Qiulian, LI Aiqin, SUN Yanni, et al.Classification method for extra-low permeability reservoirs[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(4): 51-56.
Outlines

/