Mechanisms of shale hydration and water block removal

  • Fanhui ZENG ,
  • Qiang ZHANG ,
  • Jianchun GUO ,
  • Bo ZENG ,
  • Yu ZHANG ,
  • Songgen HE
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
    2. Research Institute of Shale Gas, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu 610056, China
    3. Petroleum Engineering Technology Institute of Sinopec Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Deyang 618000, China

Received date: 2020-10-14

  Revised date: 2021-04-23

  Online published: 2021-06-23

Supported by

Science and Technology Planning Project of Sichuan Province, China(2020YJ0135);National Natural Science Foundation of China(51874250)

Abstract

Shale samples of Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Changning area of the Sichuan Basin, SW China, were selected to carry out scanning electron microscopy, CT imaging, high-pressure mercury injection, low-temperature nitrogen adsorption and imbibition experiments to compare the hydration characteristics of montmorillonite and illite, analyze the main factors affecting the water block removal of shale, and reveal the mechanisms of pore structure evolution during shale hydration. The hydration characteristics of shale are closely related to the composition of clay minerals, the shale with high illite content is not susceptible to hydration and thus has limited room for pore structure improvement; the shale with high montmorillonite is susceptible to hydration expansion and thus has higher potential of pore structure improvement by stimulation; the shale with high illite content has stronger imbibition in the initial stage, but insufficient diffusion ability, and thus is likely to have water block; the shale with high montmorillonite content has weaker imbibition in the initial stage but better water diffusion, so water blocking in this kind of shale can be removed to some degree; the shale reservoir has an optimal hydration time, when it is best in physical properties, but hydration time too long would cause damage to the reservoir, and the shale with high illite content has a shorter optimal hydration time; inorganic cations can inhibit the hydration of clay minerals and have stronger inhibition to illite expansion, especially K+; for the reservoir with high content of montmorillonite, the cation content of fracturing fluid can be lowered to promote the shale hydration; fracturing fluid with high K+ content can be injected into reservoirs with high illite content to suppress hydration.

Cite this article

Fanhui ZENG , Qiang ZHANG , Jianchun GUO , Bo ZENG , Yu ZHANG , Songgen HE . Mechanisms of shale hydration and water block removal[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021 , 48(3) : 752 -761 . DOI: 10.1016/S1876-3804(21)60061-7

References

[1] ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, JING Zhenhua, et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1):1-12.
[2] ZENG F, PENG F, GUO J, et al. A transient productivity model of fractured wells in shale reservoirs based on the succession pseudo-steady state method. Energies, 2018, 11(9):2335.
[3] AMIRHOSSEIN A, MOJTABA G, MASOUD R. Prediction of oil recovery in naturally fractured reservoirs subjected to reinfiltration during gravity drainage using a new scaling equation. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6):1212-1219.
[4] ZENG F, ZHANG Y, GUO J, et al. Optimized completion design for triggering a fracture network to enhance horizontal shale well production. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 190(1):1-16.
[5] JIANG G, LI Y, ZHANG M. Evaluation of gas wettability and its effects on fluid distribution and fluid flow in porous media. Petroleum Science, 2013, 10(4):515-527.
[6] BERTONCELLO A, WALLACE J, BLYTON C, et al. Imbibition and water blockage in unconventional reservoirs: Well-management implications during flowback and early production. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 2014, 17(4):497-506.
[7] ZHANG Lei, KANG Qinjun, YAO Jun, et al. The explanation of low recovery of fracturing fluid in shale hydraulic fracturing by pore-scale simulation. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2014, 59(32):3197-3203.
[8] CHENG Y. Impact of water dynamics in fractures on the performance of hydraulically fractured wells in gas shale reservoirs. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2012, 51(2):143-151.
[9] ZENG F, ZHANG Q, GUO J, et al. Analytical spontaneous imbibition model for confined nanofractures. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2020, 17(4):635-642.
[10] SUI Weibo, TIAN Yingying, YAO Chenhao. Investigation of microscopic pore structure variations of shale due to hydration effects through SEM fixed-point observation experiments. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5):894-901.
[11] HOWER W F. Influence of clays on the production of hydrocarbons. Louisiana: SPE Symposium on Formation Damage Control, 1974.
[12] FARAH N, DING D Y, WU Y S. Simulation of the impact of fracturing-fluid-induced formation damage in shale gas reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 2017, 20(3):532-546.
[13] KANG Yili, YANG Bin, LI Xiangchen, et al. Quantitative characterization of micro forces in shale hydration and field applications. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 44(2):301-308.
[14] MAO Haijun, GUO Yintong, WANG Guangjin, et al. Evaluation of impact of clay mineral fabrics on hydration process. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(9):2723-2728.
[15] GHANBARI E, DEHGHANPOUR H. The fate of fracturing water: A field and simulation study. Fuel, 2015, 163:282-294.
[16] GOU Q, XU S, HAO F, et al. Full-scale pores and micro-fractures characterization using FE-SEM, gas adsorption, nano-CT and micro-CT: A case study of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale in the Fuling area, Sichuan Basin, China. Fuel, 2019, 253:167-179.
[17] ZENG F, ZHANG Y, GUO J, et al. Prediction of shale apparent liquid permeability based on fractal theory. Energy and Fuels, 2020, 34(6):6822-6833.
[18] BOER J H D, LINSEN B G, PLAS T V D, et al. Studies on pore systems in catalysts: VII. Description of the pore dimensions of carbon blacks by the t method. Journal of Catalysis, 1965, 4(6):649-653.
[19] SING K. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1982, 54(11):2201-2218.
[20] KLIMAKOW M, KLOBES P, RADEMANN K, et al. Characterization of mechanochemically synthesized MOFs. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2012, 154:113-118.
[21] HU Q, EWING R P, DULTZ S. Low pore connectivity in natural rock. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2012, 133(1):76-83.
[22] YANG Y, YAO J, WANG C, et al. New pore space characterization method of shale matrix formation by considering organic and inorganic pores. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 27(2):496-503.
[23] ZENG F, ZHANG Y, GUO J, et al. A unified multiple transport mechanism model for gas through shale pores. Geofluids, 2020, 2020(2):1-17.
[24] ZENG F, PENG F, GUO J, et al. Gas mass transport model for microfractures considering the dynamic variation of width in shale reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 2019, 22(4):1265-1281.
[25] ROSHAN H, EHSANI S, MARJO C E, et al. Mechanisms of water adsorption into partially saturated fractured shales: An experimental study. Fuel, 2015, 159:628-637.
Outlines

/