Introduction
1. Geochemical characteristics of Chang 73 shale
Fig. 1. Distribution of organic-rich shale [4] (a) and stratigrpahic column (b) in Chang 7, Ordos Basin. |
Table 1. Geochemical characteristics and mineral composition of Chang 73 shale in different areas of the Ordos Basin |
| Area | TOC/% | S1/ (mg·g-1) | S2/ (mg·g-1) | HI/ (mg·g-1) | Mineral composition/% | Ro/% | Organic matter type | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felsic mineral | Carbonate | Pyrite | Clay | |||||||
| Dingbian- Jiyuan | 5.1-17.0 (9.2) | 2.0-4.8 (3.3) | 12.6-75.7 (30.3) | 130-707 (366) | 18.3-51.4 (38.2) | 0-14.8 (5.1) | 0-19.3 (5.3) | 37.6-73.4 (51.4) | 0.50-1.06 (0.83) | I—II1 |
| Huanxian- Qingcheng | 6.1-29.4 (15.5) | 1.5-6.7 (3.6) | 8.9-94.7 (39.5) | 136-403 (245) | 7.9-92.3 (42.6) | 0-45.4 (5.3) | 0-29.9 (6.1) | 3.9-83.1 (46.0) | 0.75-1.21 (1.00) | II1 |
| Heshui- Zhengning | 5.3-38.4 (17.0) | 2.3-15.6 (8.3) | 16.4-128.0 (75.7) | 169-639 (443) | 33.0-66.0 (40.5) | 0-10.2 (3.7) | 0-32.3 (12.3) | 16.1-60.4 (41.2) | 0.68-0.87 (0.76) | I—II1 |
| Tongchuan outcrop | 5.5-35.3 (15.8) | 0.6-8.5 (3.9) | 18.5-221.0 (105.8) | 331-767 (564) | 37.0-76.0 (51.2) | 0-6.6 (1.1) | 0-19.6 (10.6) | 20.7-40.3 (36.2) | 0.46-0.56 (0.49) | I—II1 |
Note: The numbers in the brackets are the average values. |
Fig. 2. Correlation between HI and Tmax of Chang 73 in different areas of the Ordos Basin. |
2. Hydrocarbon transformation ratio of Chang 73 shale
Fig. 3. Correlation between organic matter transformation ratio and Tmax in Chang 73 shale, Ordos Basin. |
3. Hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency of Chang 73 shale
Table 2. Hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency of Chang 7 shale in Ordos Basin |
| Ref. | Method | Sample | Hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency/% | Influence factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [8] | Simulation experiment | Excellent source rock, TOC>5%, Ro=0.90%-1.15% | 60%-90%, avg. 80% | TOC |
| Others, TOC<5%, Ro=0.90%-1.15% | 30%-70%, avg. 43.7% | |||
| [25] | Simulation experiment | Organic-rich shale, TOC≥6% | Avg. 77.3% | Lithology, TOC |
| Mudstone, TOC<6% | Avg. 42.7% | |||
| [9] | Material balance | Ro=0.9%-1.0% | El=50%-60%, Ex=80%-90% | TOC, OG type and Ro |
| Ro=1.3% | El=75%-85%, Ex>90% | |||
| [15] | Material balance | Ro=0.8%, Type I | 35% | Ro |
| Ro=0.8%, Type II | 20% | |||
| Ro=1.1%, Type I | 65% | |||
| Ro=1.1%, Type II | 56% | |||
| [27] | Material balance | TOC>10% | Avg. 80% | TOC |
| TOC=2%-10% | Avg. 60% | |||
| [30] | Material balance | TOC=1.9%-17.2%, avg. 6.7% | Avg. 80% | Lithology, TOC |
| [28] | Hydrocarbon- generation potential method | Ro=1.0% | ˃60% | TOC, Ro |
| [29] | Hydrocarbon- generation potential method | TOC=0.4%-9.6%, avg. 2.4% | Avg. 42.5% | Lithology, Ro |
Fig. 4. Correlation between pyrolysis data, TOC and S2 of sealed coring samples and conventional coring samples of Chang 73 shale. (a) Correlation between retained hydrocarbons and TOC obtained by different methods. (b) Correlation between S1* and S2 during pyrolysis of sealed coring samples. |
Fig. 5. Histogram of cumulative and relative hydrocarbon expulsion efficiencies of Chang 73 shale. |
4. Effect of sealing conditions of Chang 73 shale on the quantity and quality of retained hydrocarbons
Fig. 6. Pyrolysis geochemical parameters and hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency of Chang 73 shale of Well G135. |
Fig. 7. Quantity (a) and relative efficiency (b) of hydrocarbon expulsion vs. TOC at different locations in Chang 73 shale. |
Fig. 8. Faults and siltstone distribution of Chang 7 and Chang 73 in Qingcheng area, Ordos Basin (see |
Fig. 9. Chromatogram of normal alkanes in (a) shale oil and (b) shale extract of Chang 73 in Qingcheng area, Ordos Basin. |
Fig. 10. Geochemical characteristics, resources and proved reserves of tight oil-shale oil in Yanchang Formation of Ordos Basin. |