The Central African Shear Zone (CASZ), extending from the Gulf of Guinea in the west to the Red Sea in the east, is a lithospheric transformation zone with a length of 4000 km
[1], whose basement is a lithospheric vulnerable zone formed in the Pan-African tectonic motion
[1⇓⇓⇓-5]. With the break-up of the Gondwana continent during the Mesozoic and the Cenozoic
[2⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓-10], Africa separated from its peripheral plates successively and accordingly the Mid Atlantic, South Atlantic, Indian Ocean opened and expanded in turn, inducing activation of the CASZ and formation of a series of Meso-Cenozoic rift basins striking near E-W and NW-SE directions called “the central African rift basin group” in the interior as well as the south and north flanks of the CASZ, respectively
[1⇓⇓⇓-5,8 -9]. Medium-large oil and gas fields have been discovered in the highly explored basins located at the south and north flanks of the CASZ, such as the Muglad, Melut and Bongor basins, uncovering abundant hydrocarbon resources in the central African rift basin group
[1⇓⇓⇓-5,8⇓ -10]. Different from the typical intracontinental passive rift basins in the south and north flanks of the CASZ like the Muglad Basin
[7⇓-9,11⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓ -17] caused by the transition of shear stress to extension stress, the Doseo Basin in the interior of the CASZ experienced chronical strike-slip and multiphase inversion transformation
[1⇓-3,7⇓ -9,18] and thus possessed more complicated tectonic features. At present, the genetic mechanism of the Doseo Basin is still controversial. Some scholars believed that the dextral strike-slip motion of the Borogop fault with a right-step extension in the horizon led to formation of a series of dextral and right-step pull-apart basins during the early Cretaceous, i.e. the Doba, Doseo and Salamat Basins, etc., occurring successively along the Borogop fault from west to east and thus the pull-apart activity induced by the dextral and right-step strike-slip motion of the Borogop fault led to formation of the Doseo Basin
[8-9,19⇓ -21]. However, other researchers suggested that the Doseo Basin was formed due to the nearly N-S extensional rifting before the strike-slip motion of the CASZ and was chronically transformed by the subsequent strike-slip motion
[7,17 -18]. In addition, a few scholars thought that the Doseo Basin was formed as a transitional basin for coordination of movement of the peripheral continental blocks and its evolution was controlled by the mantle convection
[22-23]. Moreover, there are multiple interpretations about inversion genesis mechanism of the Doseo Basin, such as the transition of the CASZ from dextral to sinistral strike-slip motion
[2-3,9,20], the convergence between Africa and Eurasia
[1,5,7 -8,19], the change of the movement direction of the sub-plates in the interior of the Africa plate
[18], and the direction variation of the mantle convection
[22-23], etc. In addition, the studies on the basin tectonic activity periods, strike-slip fault and tectonic inversion features and their genetic mechanism are still in exploratory stage and a rational basin evolution model has not been established yet. The above controversial cognitions of the Doseo Basin are caused mainly by the puzzled understanding of the basin structures, unconformities, inversion structures and faults studied by predecessors based on regional geological and geophysical data
[8⇓-10,17⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓ -23], such as outcrop, gravity and magnetic as well as a few 2D seismic data etc., displaying the lack of high-precise seismic and drilling data.