A hydraulic fracture network typically consists of propped fractures filled with proppants and fracturing fluid near the wellbore, self-supporting fractures filled solely with fracturing fluid, and natural fractures connected at the distal ends. Self-supporting fractures usually generate during the fracturing process, but late slip and dislocate under shear effect, consequently exhibiting the self-supporting characteristics under closed stress
[8]. For propped fractures, proppant type, closure stress, and proppant concentration are the primary factors influencing fracture conductivity
[9-10]. The addition of proppants significantly enhances the flow capacity of induced fractures in shale and markedly reduces stress sensitivity: when effective stress was less than 15-20 MPa, fracture permeability decreased sharply by 60.16%-82.21%
[11]. At 30 MPa effective stress, the permeability of propped fractures in the Changning Block declined by 40%-63.14%, whereas that of self-supporting fractures decreased by 90.0%-94.7%
[12-13]. At 35 MPa, the permeability of self-supporting fractures in transitional shales at the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin was reduced by 97.1%
[14]. At 55 MPa, propped fractures in the Longmaxi Formation in Fuling gas field experienced stress-induced permeability damage by 47%, while self-supporting fractures suffered as much as 87%
[15]. The conductivity of self-supporting fractures increases with shear slip displacement, and is positively correlated with the fractal dimension of fracture width and inversely correlated with fracture tortuosity
[16]. Lu et al. demonstrated through 3D morphology simulation that high fracture surface roughness, large shear slip displacement, and high Young’s modulus play positive roles in resisting stress-induced closure of self- supporting fractures
[17]. These findings clearly indicate that, under increasing effective stress, self-supporting fractures are more sensitive than propped fractures, shown by closing faster and severer, thus exerting a greater influence on fracture network conductivity during production
[18]. However, during hydraulic fracturing, tens of thousands of cubic meters of fracturing fluid is injected into the formation, and gas-water two-phase flow is universally present in the fracture network throughout the production. Previous studies have primarily focused on evaluating the conductivity of self-supporting fractures, with limited attention to the gas-water flow behavior during fracture closure. Yang et al. conducted gas-water flow experiments on shale self-supporting fractures parallel and perpendicular to bedding under different confining stresses
[19], and preliminarily revealed the linear flow in micron-scale self-supporting fractures, fracture surface roughness and width, and gas-water flow ratio on two-phase relative permeability curves. Nonetheless, the intrinsic mechanisms remain unclear.