Numerical simulations were conducted on the differences in recovery factor and
Eout/
Ein under different heating and extraction methods. Two models, i.e., horizontal well + vertical well (
Fig. 10a) and horizontal well + horizontal well (
Fig. 10b), were designed. Four horizontal heating wells were placed in a square shape with a spacing of 5 m. The maximum distance of artificial hydrocarbon self-displacement obtained from simulation for the vertical well was set at 9.8 m. In an ideal model,
Eout is the thermal energy contained in the final produced oil and gas, and
Ein is the energy input from the outside, that is, the electrical energy consumed by the heater, without considering the energy consumed by engineering and operations (e.g. drilling, extraction, etc.). In addition, using a single heating well group for heating will cause a large amount of thermal energy to diffuse to the peripheral low-temperature zones. Therefore, a 4×4 heating well model was adopted, with a shale cross-section of 15 m×15 m and a length of 20 m. Then, a heating well group in the middle (cross-section of 10 m×10 m) was selected to compare the recovery factor and
Eout/
Ein in the lifecycle of in-situ conversion between horizontal well pattern and stereoscopic well pattern. Under the same geological and engineering conditions, after heating for 500-600 d, the average conversion rate of organic matter in shale reached over 80%, the recovery factor of the stereoscopic well pattern was 50%-63%, about 1.53 times that of the horizontal well pattern (33%-41%), and the
Eout/
Ein was 5.8-7.2, about 1.44 times that of the horizontal well pattern. It can be seen that the stereoscopic well pattern has a higher
Eout/
Ein, which should be specifically considered in subsequent research and field experiments.