PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 46(1): 67-81 doi:

RESEARCH PAPER

New insights into multiple provenances evolution of the Jurassic from heavy minerals characteristics in southern Junggar Basin, NW China

ZHOU Tianqi1,2, WU Chaodong,1,2, YUAN Bo3, SHI Zhongkui4, WANG Jialin2, ZHU Wen5, ZHOU Yanxi1,2, JIANG Xi1,2, ZHAO Jinyong3, WANG Jun6, MA Jian1,2

1 Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, Ministry of Education, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

2 Institute of Oil and Gas, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

3 Geophysics Department in Exploration and Development Institution of Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Urumqi 834000, China

4 Institute of Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

5 Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Sinopec, Beijing 100083, China

6 Department of Xinjiang Exploration Project Management, Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Company, Dongying 257000, China

Corresponding authors: * E-mail: cdwu@pku.edu.cn

Received: 2018-09-4   Online: 2019-02-15

Fund supported: Supported by the China National Science and Technology Major Project2017ZX05008-001

Abstract

The method of random forest was used to classify the heavy mineral assemblages of 2 418 Jurassic samples in the southern Junggar Basin, and determine the distribution of the heavy mineral assemblages from the same provenance systems. Based on the analysis of heavy minerals assemblages, ZTR index, sedimentary characteristics, U-Pb zircon ages, whole-rock geochemical and paleocurrent direction analysis, the study reveals that five important provenances were providing sediments to the southern Junggar Basin in the Jurassic period: The North Tianshan (NTS), Central Tianshan (CTS), Bogda Mountains, Zhayier Mountains and Kalamaili Mountains. During the Early Jurassic, NTS-CTS, Kalamaili Mountains and Zhayier Mountains are primary provenances, Bogda Mountains started to uplift and supply clastic materials in the Middle Jurassic. There are three sedimentary area in the Jurassic of southern Junggar Basin: the western part, the central part and the eastern part. In the western part, the clastic materials of the Early Jurassic was mainly from NTS blocks and Zhayier Mountains, and the sediments were dominantly derived from the Zhayier Mountains during the Middle-Late Jurassic. In the central part, the main provenance of the Early Jurassic switched from NTS to CTS. In the Xishanyao Formation, the main source went back to NTS again. The NTS was the primary provenance during the sedimentary periods of Toutunhe Formation and Qigu Formation. In the eastern part, the contribution of CTS and Kalamaili Mountains were considered as major provenances in the Early Jurassic-Xishanyao Formation, small proportion of sediments were from NTS. The Bogda mountains uplifted and started to provide sediments to the Junggar Basin in the sedimentary period of Xishanyao Formation, and became the major source during the Toutunhe Formation period, with small amount of sediments from CTS. The provenance from CTS was hindered during the sedimentary period of Qigu Formation owing to the uplifting of the Bogda mountains, and the sediments were mainly from the Bogda mountains and NTS.

Keywords: southern Junggar Basin ; Jurassic ; source to sink system ; provenance ; heavy minerals assemblages ; random forest

PDF (1059KB) Metadata Metrics Related articles Export EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  Favorite

Cite this article

ZHOU Tianqi, WU Chaodong, YUAN Bo, SHI Zhongkui, WANG Jialin, ZHU Wen, ZHOU Yanxi, JIANG Xi, ZHAO Jinyong, WANG Jun, MA Jian. New insights into multiple provenances evolution of the Jurassic from heavy minerals characteristics in southern Junggar Basin, NW China. [J], 2019, 46(1): 67-81 doi:

Introduction

There are abundant oil and gas resources in the southern margin of the Junggar Basin (hereinafter “the southern Junggar Basin” for short), and the Jurassic in the southern Junggar Basin is characterized by multiple sources and sink systems. As the important coal bearing strata and hydrocarbon-rich source rocks, the Jurassic in the southern Junggar Basin contains 30.7% oil resources and 45.7% natural gas resources of the whole basin, but the proved ratio is currently low, so it has huge oil and gas exploration potential[1,2,3]. Many schol-ars have studied the sedimentary environment and provenance evolution of the Jurassic in the southern Junggar Basin, but nearly all of them reconstructed the regional provenance system only based on a single section or several wells. Consequently, the understandings on the evolution process of main provenances are still controversial in the following aspects. First, so far, the main provenances in the western part of the southern Junggar Basin during the Jurassic haven’t been known clearly. Some think that the clastic materials are mainly derived from either the Zhayier Mountains or the Tianshan Mountains[1,2], while others deem that both the Zhayier Mountains and the Tianshan Mountains were the provenances simultaneously[3,4,5,6]. Second, no agreement is reached on the sedimentary environment of the central part of the southern Junggar Basin during the Jurassic[7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Third, the uplifting event of Bogda Mountains is the key node leading to the change of the Jurassic provenance system, and there are two viewpoints on the uplifting time, i.e., Early-Middle Jurassic[9, 15-16] and Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous[17,18,19,20]. Obviously, it is necessary to carry out further study on the evolution of the Jurassic source-sink system and the process of depositional filling in the southern Junggar Basin.

The heavy mineral assemblage analysis is widely applied to analyze source-sink system[21]. Some researchers have tried to find out the parent rock characteristics and evolution process of a single provenance in the southern Junggar Basin by using a small number of heavy mineral samples[2, 22-24], but specific methods which are used to reconstruct the multiple provenances evolution process based on a great number of heavy mineral assemblages still need to be investigated further. In the analysis of heavy mineral assemblages, hierarchical cluster analysis is often used to obtain the variation trend of heavy mineral types to determine the influence sphere and distribution characteristics of different provenances. But the hierarchical cluster analysis approach has several disadvantages: First, the spatial distribution of samples is not taken into consideration, so results inconsistent with proved understanding often occur. Second, there are too many types of heavy mineral assemblages in the cluster analysis results, making it difficult to tell the types of parent rocks, especially to tell the primary provenance from the secondary provenance. Third, some categories in the cluster analysis results can’t show characteristics of specific provenance. In this study, in order to solve these problems, the samples of typical heavy minerals consistent with the parent rocks in a single potential provenance were selected as the training samples based on the cluster analysis results and the spatial distribution characteristics of the samples, then, a random forest classification[25] model was trained to get more rational heavy mineral assemblages classification results.

To avoid the weak points of hierarchical cluster analysis approach, this paper takes the heavy mineral assemblages of 2418 samples in 142 wells and 10 filed sections in the southern Junggar Basin as the research objects. Based on hierarchical cluster analysis approach, combined with Random Forest[25] supervising classification method, the Jurassic heavy mineral assemblages with the same provenance characteristics are classified in consideration of the spatial distribution characteristics of the samples and the types of parent rocks in the provenance. In addition, ZTR index (the ratio of the content sum of zircon, tourmaline and rutile to the content sum of transparent minerals) is calculated. Then, combined with the characteristics of sedimentary environment, the comparison of detrital zircon ages of source-sink systems, the trace elements and the paleocurrent direction analysis, the characteristics and the differences of the Jurassic provenance systems in the southern Junggar Basin are analyzed comprehensively. Finally, the evolution process of the Jurassic multi-sources system in the southern Junggar Basin is revealed.

1. Regional geologic setting and potential provenances

The southern Junggar Basin is bounded by Jinghe County in Xinjiang on the west and Dashitou area of Mulei County on the east. And it extends to the North Tianshan on the south and to the Urumqi-Erie Road on the north. The southern Junggar Basin is divided into three parts, i.e., western part, central part and eastern part[3]. The western part mainly includes the southern Chepaizi uplift and Sikeshu sag. The central part consists of Qigu fault belt and southern Changji sag. And the eastern part is divided into three second-order structural units, i.e., southwest Fukang sag (east Fukang slope belt), Fukang fault belt and southern Jimusaer sag[3] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.   Structural sketch of the southern margin of the Junggar Basin and the location map of the study area.


Developed completely, the Jurassic in the Southern Junggar Basin includes Badaowan Formation and Sangonghe Formation of the Lower Jurassic, Xishanyao Formation and Toutunhe Formation of the Middle Jurassic, Qigu Formation and Kalazha Formation of the Upper Jurassic from the bottom to the top (Fig. 2). Five sections in the southern Junggar Basin (Fig. 3) show that sedimentary characteristics and lithological combinations of the Jurassic in the western, central and eastern parts are obviously different. During the deposition of Badaowan Formation, alluvial fan and braided river delta plain developed in the southern margin of the western part and the central part of the southern Junggar Basin. And due to the continuous retreating of the provenance, the delta plain evolved gradually into the delta front. Lakeshore deposit developed in the eastern part of the southern Junggar Basin, where thick coal seams developed above the lakeside swamp. During the deposition of the Sangonghe Formation, lake transgression occurred in the whole basin[26,27], the whole southern Junggar Basin was in the sedimentary environment of shore lacustrine, the mudstone thickness increased from the west to the east, and the depocenter was located along the northern margin of Bogda Mountains[3]. During the deposition of Xishanyao Formation, meandering river delta front also developed in the eastern part of the southern Junggar Basin, but the thickness and size of the mouth bar were far less than that in the central part. During the deposition of Toutunhe Formation, a sedimentary system of shallow braided river delta developed in the whole southern Junggar Basin, Shore lacustrine developed in the southern edge of the western part and braided river delta was widely distributed in the northern edge of the western part. In the central part of the southern Junggar Basin, braided river delta developed, which transformed upward into shore-shallow lake gradually. During the deposition of Qigu Formation, the deposit of braided river delta developed in the northern margin of the western part while the coastal deposit of wide-shallow oxidized lake with the meandering delta front developed in the southern edge of the western part and the central part[7,28].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.   Composite columnar section of the Jurassic in the southern Junggar Basin.


Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.   Columnar sections of the Jurassic on field profiles in southern Junggar (N: Palaeocurrent quantity).


The analysis on paleogeomorphology and sedimentary environment characteristics indicates that the potential provenances in the southern Junggar Basin may include the Zhayier Mountains along the northwestern margin, the North Tianshan and the Central Tianshan in the southern margin, the Bogda Mountains in the east and the Kalamaili Mountains in the northeast. The main provenance characteristics and the corresponding heavy mineral assemblages are listed in Table 1.

Table 1   Characteristics of parent rocks of Jurassic potential provenances in the southern Junggar Basin.

ProvenanceAge of parent rock/MaLithology of parent rockHeavy mineral assemblage
North
Tianshan
360-420, 250-316Intermediate acidic-acidic volcanic rock,
volcanoclastic rock and tuff
Zircon (automorphous)-Tourmaline (pink)-
Apatite-Hornblende-Monazite-Mica-Rutile
Central
Tianshan
320-360, 230-300Post-collision type A granite, Early Paleozoic
volcanic rock and granite
Apatite-Zircon-Tourmaline -
Magnetite + Titanite
320-485Medium-high rank metamorphic rock (e.g. metamorphic rock evolved from granite, granite mylonite, granite gneiss), and Pre-Cambrian metamorphic rockLeucoxene-Garnet-Epidote -Muscovite-
Zoisite-Sillimanite
Bogda
Mountains
(western)
210-390Granite, rhyolite and volcanoclastic rockZircon-Tourmaline -Apatite-Muscovite-
Titanite-Ilmenite-Sericite
270-350, 221.0±6.5Intermediate-basic volcanic rock:
basalt and andesitic basalt
Magnetite-Ilmenite-Leucoxene-Augite-
Olivine-Orthopyroxene -Chlorite-Sericite
Zhayier
Mountains
220-350Intermediate acidic-acidic rock matrix: granite,
moyite, alkali granite and syenite porphyry
Ilmenite + Apatite + Zircon +
Apatite + Hornblende
360-425, 472Ophiolite belt: basalt, ophiolite and gabbroIlmenite + Chromite
Kalamaili
Mountains
250-300, 350-380
400-413, 475-520
Intermediate acidic-acidic eruptive rock, volcanoclastic
rock; Ophiolite belt: amphibolite
Zircon-Tourmaline-Apatite-Magnetite-
Titanite-Rutile
300-350, 388-420, 485-510Ophiolite belt: basalt, diabase and gabbroMagnetite-Augite-Garnet-Chromite-
Ilmenite-Zoisite

Data source: the Zhayier Mountains[4,33-37], the Bogda Mountains[16,38-42], the Tianshan Mountains[43,44,45,46,47,48], the Kalamaili Mountains[49,50,51]

New window| CSV


2. Classification of heavy mineral assemblages based on hierarchical cluster-random forest classification method

2.1. Introduction on hierarchical cluster-random forest classification method

Different from the hierarchical cluster analysis approach, random forest classification is a kind of supervising classification method. In essence, it is an ensemble classifier that uses a set of decision trees to make prediction. It mainly includes two processes, i.e., training and classification (Fig. 4). In the training process, some sample subsets are selected from the original sample set[29], then a set of decision trees are trained using Classification and Regression Trees (CART) algorithm, based on these sample subsets. In the process of classification, a new unlabelled data input is evaluated against all decision trees created in the ensemble and each tree votes for a category. The category with the maximum votes will be the one that is finally selected[25]. A great number of studies demonstrate that the random forest classification method has many merits such as high accuracy, robustness against noise, capacity to deal with high-dimension features[30,31,32]. These advantages make it possible to identify the categories of heavy mineral assemblages accurately.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.   Flow chart of heavy mineral assemblage classification based on hierarchical cluster-random forest classification method.


2.2. Experimental design on hierarchical cluster-random forest classification method

Through comparing the contents of 25 kinds of heavy minerals in 2418 Jurassic samples, firstly Q-type cluster (that is clustering on samples, gathering the sampers with similar characteristicswhile separating the sampers with big difference) was conducted on the samples of different formations in the Jurassic. And the cluster results are shown by using heatmaps (Fig. 5). In the cluster results, the situation that samples similar in heavy minerals but derived from different sedimentary areas are classified as one category can occur. For example, the category defined in the green block in Fig. 5b includes the samples of the Sikeshu sag, the Qigu fault belt and the Fukang fault belt. Obviously, it has no typical provenance indication.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.   Cluster analysis results of heavy minerals in the southern Junggar Basin during the Jurassic.


Then, on the basis of cluster analysis, samples with typcial provenance characteristics were selected to train the random forest classification model. Firstly, the samples with heavy mineral assemblages similar to that of the parent rocks of the potential provenance were picked. Then, the main provenances of the samples were analyzed based on their location, paleocurrent direction and major-trace elements. If these characteristics could effectively indicate the provenance of a sample, this sample could be taken as the typical specimen of heavy mineral assemblages to indicate the provenance. For example, sample 1 (taken from Badaowan Formation of Shichang section) of B3 group in Fig. 5a has the heavy mineral assemblage of Leucoxene+zircon+garnet+tourmaline, its paleocurrent direction is north-northeast (Fig. 3), and its major-trace element plot (Fig. 6) shows that its provenance is intermediate-acidic felsic volcanic rock, so it can be taken as the typical sample indicating the provenance of the North-Central Tianshan. According to above-mentioned principles, training samples were selected with the content of 25 kinds of heavy minerals as the features and the category of clustered heavy mineral assemblage as the target (Fig. 5). Referring to the parameter setting method[32], the number of trees was set at 200, and the number of variables per node was set at the square root of the total number of variables. Then the trained random forest was used to classify all Jurassic samples in the southern Junggar Basin, to obtain the categories of heavy mineral assemblages.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.   Provenance type identification based on trace elements for the southern Jungar Basin. PAAS: Eparchean Australian shale; UC: supracrustal[42].


In order to verify the proposed method, the analysis results of the Badaowan Formation in the central part and the western part of the southern Junggar Basin from hierarchical cluster analysis were compared with those from the proposed method. It can be seen from Fig. 7 that the random forest classification method removes the unreasonable categories in the cluster results, and highlights two different kinds of heavy mineral assemblages in the western part and central part of the southern Junggar Basin, respectively. The heavy mineral assemblages in the western part is composed of ilmenite+zircon+ garnet (dominantly green and blue pie charts in Fig. 7), and the heavy mineral assemblage in the central part consist of leucouxene+magnetite+zircon+garnet+tourmaline+apatite (dominantly pink, yellow and orange pie charts in Fig. 7). Obviously, they are derived from different provenances. In the hierarchical cluster results, however, the distribution of heavy mineral assemblages is chaotic without obvious regularities. Overall high-dimensional feature samples cause difficulties in hierarchical clustering. On the contrary, the random forest classification method is suitable for processing samples with high-dimensional features and can avoid the influence of sample errors effectively. In summary, the random forest classification is applicable to distinguish the different sources and varied sedimentary areas with distinctive heavy mineral assemblages.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.   Distribution of heavy mineral assemblages in the southern Junggar Basin during the Jurassic.


In order to identify the different provenances effectively, the percentage of different categories of heavy mineral assemblages in each well was calculated, and the pie chart of heavy mineral assemblages was plotted on the plane (Fig. 7). Then, the type of parent rock was determined according to the locations of different heavy mineral assemblages and their percentages in each well, seeing Table 2.

Table 2   Distribution of heavy mineral assemblages in different sedimentary areas of the southern Junggar Basin.

FormationCurrent locationSample numberAverage content of main heavy minerals/%Main heavy mineral assemblagesInferred parent
rock type
Leuco-
xene
ZirconTour-
maline
GarnetEpidoteIlme-
nite
Mag-
netite
Apatite
Qigu+ToutunheNorth margin of
Sikeshu sag
2420.914.840.202.42089.101.820Ilmenite+
zircon+garnet
Basic magmatic rock+
medium-low rank
metamorphic rock
Qigu fault belt4473.102.7503.9270.941.8815.000.05Epidote+
magnetite+
leucoxene+
zircon+garnet
Medium-low rank
metamorphic rock+
intermediate acidic-
acidic magmatic rock
Fukang fault belt51315.313.0600.6869.829.0900Leucoxene+
epidote+
ilmenite
Medium-low rank
metamorphic rock+intermediate acidic-acidic-
basic magmatic rock
South margin of
Sikeshu sag
14615.824.0002.0440.8236.3300
XishanyaoNorth margin of
Sikeshu sag
171.224.410.302.59091.0300Ilmenite+
zircon+
a little garnet
Basic magmatic rock+
medium-low rank metamorphic rock
Qigu fault belt4140.6326.2009.940010.568.63Leucoxene+
magnetite+
zircon+
garnet+apatite
Medium-low rank metamorphic rock+
intermediate-acidic magmatic rock
Fukang fault belt6420.2020.762.9418.51035.5100Zircon+
garnet+
leucoxene+
ilmenite
Medium-low rank metamorphic rock+
intermediate acidic- acidic-basic magmatic rock
South margin of
Sikeshu sag
3730.0923.481.479.72027.8504.31
Sangonghe+BadaowanNorth margin of
Sikeshu sag
632.6331.370.0816.6310.9636.371.020Ilmenite+
zircon+garnet+
epidote
Basic magmatic rock+
medium-low rank metamorphic rock
South margin of
Sikeshu sag
20734.5420.250.5120.2008.2016.200Leucoxene+magnetite+zircon+garnet+tourmaline+apatite+a little epidoteMedium-low rank metamorphic rock+
intermediate acidic-
acidic magmatic rock
Qigu fault belt22347.609.435.3618.423.6003.2010.58
Fukang fault belt41822.6814.394.7113.001.5239.2303.78Zircon+
garnet+
leucoxene+
ilmenite
Medium-low rank metamorphic rock+
intermediate acidic- acidic-basic magmatic rock

New window| CSV


3. The evolution of the Jurassic provenances in the southern Junggar Basin

The sedimentary environments and provenance characteristics of 10 field sections and 152 wells in the southern Junggar Basin were investigated comprehensively by means of heavy mineral assemblages analysis, ZTR index analysis, paleocurrent direction analysis, detrital zircon dating analysis and trace element analysis.

3.1. Heavy mineral assemblage analysis

Based on hierarchical cluster-random forest classification method, each heavy mineral assemblage indicates a certain provenance. The heavy mineral assemblages of the lower Jurassic and the Xishanyao Formation are similar, and are dominantly composed of stable heavy minerals. The heavy mineral assemblages include three types, i.e., assemblage 1: ilmenite + zircon + garnet, assemblage 2: leucoxene + zircon + garnet + magnetite + apatite + tourmaline + a little epidote, and assemblage 3: leucoxene + ilmenite + zircon + garnet (red, yellow and blue circle in Fig. 7) Mainly distributed in Sikeshu sag, Assemblage 1 indicates that the parent rock is basic magmatic rock + intermediate- acidic magmatic rock and the heavy mineral components are similar to those in the Zhayier Mountains and the Bogda Mountains (Table 1), which proves that Zhayier Mountains was one of the major provenances of the southern Junggar Basin then. Assemblage 2 is mainly distributed in Qigu fault belt. Its higher content of leucoxene indicates that there are low- and medium-rank metamorphic rocks in the parent rocks of its provenances. Referring to Table 1, this assemblage indicates that North Tianshan-Central Tianshan was the main provenance. Mainly distributed in the north margin of the Bogda Mountains, assemblage 3 is more complex in provenance, it might be derived from the Bogda Mountains, the Tianshan Mountains or the Kalamaili Mountains.

The content of unstable minerals in the Toutunhe Formation and the Qigu Formation increase sharply, and there is a large amount of epidote and magnetite in the north margin of the North Tianshan-Bogda Mountains (green circle in Fig. 7), indicating that the Bogda Mountains-Tianshan Mountains was uplifted during the Middle-Late Jurassic.

In general, the deposits of the Lower Jurassic in the southern Junggar Basin might be derived from the North Tianshan- Central Tianshan, the Zhayier Mountains and the Kalamaili Mountains. The Bogda Mountains began to uplift during the late depositional stage of the Xishanyao Formation and became one of the predominant provenances in the southern Junggar Basin during the deposition of the Toutunhe Formation.

3.2. ZTR index

The indexes of stable heavy minerals are often used to reflect the maturity of clastic rocks and the direction of sediments input. Among them, ZTR index is the ratio of the combined zircon, tourmaline and rutile content to the content of transparent heavy minerals omitting micas and authigenic minerals[52]. With the increasing of ZTR index, the distance between the source area and the sink area increases, and vice versa. 248 Jurassic heavy mineral samples were selected to compare their ZTR indexes from the aspects of vertical and spatial changes. Fig. 8 shows that the ZTR index of Sikeshu sag during the Early Jurassic presents two increasing trends mainly along NNE and NE, indicating there are two provenances in the northwest and the south, respectively. The ZTR index of Qigu fault belt increases northwards, suggesting that the provenance in the south provided the clastic materials to the north at the time. The ZTR index of Fukang fault belt presents the increasing trends along SE and NE (Fig. 8), which corresponds to the south-north bidirectional paleocurrent directions along the northern margin of the Bogda Mountains. It is inferred that the North Tianshan-Central Tianshan and the Kalamaili Mountains were the provenances of the southern Junggar Basin then. Corresponding to the increase of the content of epidote and magnetite, the ZTR index of Qigu fault belt and Fukang fault belt decrease sharply in Xishanyao Formation, which also indicates the uplifting of North Tianshan and Bogda Mountains during the deposition period of Toutunhe Formation. Fig. 9 shows that the ZTR index of the southern Junggar Basin increases continuously in the whole lower- Jurassic, indicating that the provenances commonly retreated during the Early Jurassic. During the deposition of Xishanyao Formation, ZTR index began to decrease, indicating that the provenances advanced again. The ZTR index of the Toutunhe Formation decreases sharply in the southern Junggar Basin except Sikeshu sag, demonstrating that the uplifting of the North Tianshan-Bogda Mountains had less effect on the western part of the southern Junggar Basin, and the Zhayier Mountains also experienced a small scale uplift[53]. The change trend of ZTR index proves that besides North Tianshan-Central Tianshan and Zhayier Mountains, Kalamaili Mountains was also a provenance of the southern Junggar Basin during the Early Jurassic.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.   Spatial distribuiton of ZTR index in the southern Junggar Basin during the Jurassic.


Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.   Vertical distribution of ZTR index in the Jurassic of all areas of the southern Junggar Basin.


3.3. Paleocurrent direction

Abundant data of paleocurrent direction is one of the important bases for determining the provenance direction. It is revealed by surveying the paleocurrent directions of 5 sections (Fig. 3), combined with the statistics of paleocurrent directions by other researchers[9,16,53-54], that during the deposition of Early Jurassic to Xishanyao Formation, the paleocurrent directions in Sikeshu sag and Qigu fault belt were mainly northward, which indicate that North Tianshan-Central Tianshan was the dominant provenance. In the meantime, both southward and southeastward paleocurrent directions presented in Fukang fault belt, which confirms that Kalamaili Mountain was also the provenance of the southern Junggar Basin. During the Middle Jurassic, southward paleocurrent directions began to occur in the north margin of Sikeshu sag, which shows that the content of clastic materials derived from Zhayier Mountains was increasing. In addition, during the deposition of Xishanyao Formation, the northward paleocurrent directions increased gradually along the northern margin of Bogda Mountains, which reveals that Bogda Mountains might begin to uplift[16]. The data of paleocurrent directions verifies the preliminary cognitions obtained based on heavy mineral assemblages, and confirms that the Kalamaili Mountain was the major provenance of sediments in the southern Junggar Basin during the Jurassic.

3.4. U-Pb detrital zircon dating

Abundant data of U-Pb detrital zircon ages were collected by others in order to study thoroughly the Jurassic source to sink systems in the southern Junggar Basin[16,26,47,55]. The Jurassic detrital zircon ages of the southern Junggar Basin were compared with the age of magmatic rocks and metamorphic rocks in the potential provenances (data source shown in Table 1). It is found the Jurassic detrital zircon ages of the central part along the southern margin can be interpreted as a mixture of two sources: late Paleozoic intermediate acidic- acidic magmatic belt in the North Tianshan (250-320 Ma) and the Cambrian-Devonian magmatic rocks or metamorphic rocks in the Central Tianshan (380-485 Ma). The unimodal age peak of detrital zircon samples of Badaowan Formation-Xishanyao Formation transfers from 300 Ma to 396 Ma, which indicates that the major provenance changed from the North Tianshan to the Central Tianshan. The ages of Toutunhe Formation and Qigu Formation is dominantly 230-320 Ma again (Fig. 10), suggesting that North Tianshan became the dominant provenance again, which is accordant with the vertical change trend of the ZTR index. The detrital zircon age of Badaowan Formation in the east of the southern Junggar Basin presents the unique ages of 485-520 Ma, which is the first appearance of ophiolite age from the Kalamaili Mountains, may from the recycling part of palaeozoic strata. Furthermore, southward paleocurrent direction along the northern margin of Bogda Mountains shown by a lot of data also proves Kalamaili Mountains was a provenance of the southern Junggar Basin. From Xishanyao Formation, the proportion of the number of the samples with zircon age of 485-520 Ma decrease continuously in the east of the southern Junggar Basin, and the age of early Paleozoic intermediate acidic-acidic volcanic rock become predominant, while the samples with zircon age of less than 230 Ma increases gradually, indicating that Bogda Mountains already began to uplift at that time (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.   Correlation of Jurassic clastic zircon age and potential provenaces of the southern Junggar Basin. N: number of samples; n: number of zircon grains; provenance data shown in Table 1.


3.5. Trace element analysis method

Inert elements can reflect the characteristics of provenances and tectonic settings, so the content ratios of some inert elements were taken as the basis for characteristic comparison of source-sink areas. Totally, 93 Jurassic samples of the southern Junggar Basin were selected for trace element test. And La/Th, Hf, Co/Th and La/Sc ratios were used to identify provenances[42]. Fig. 6 shows that the major source material during the Early Jurassic was mainly acidic-felsic magmatic rock, also confirming that North Tianshan-Central Tianshan was the dominant provenance of the southern Junggar Basin in the Early Jurassic. From the deposition of Xishanyao Formation, the sediments of felsic and basaltic mixture began to present in Fukang fault belt, which is the same in composition with the samples of Permian along the northern margin of Bogda Mountains[42]. Accordingly, we can conclude that the major sources of these sedimentary rocks are the late Paleozoic bimodal volcanic rocks from Bogda Mountains.

To sum up, during the Early Jurassic, Tianshan Mountains suffered denudation and truncation continuously, the North Tianshan-Central Tianshan controlled Jurassic provenance systems of the southern Junggar Basin, the Zhayier Mountains and the Kalamaili Mountains also acted as provenances of the southern Junggar Basin. Thick shore lacustrine-related swamp deposit indicates that Bogda Mountains was still the sink area during the early Jurassic (Fig. 11). In that period, sediment supplying rate was basically equal to the subsidence rate of the basin, and stable depression subsidence was dominant, so the Junggar Basin was a passively subsiding depression basin in weak extensional setting during the early Jurassic[3].

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11.   Evolution pattern of provenances in the southern Junggar Basin during Jurassic.


At the end of Xishanyao Formation, the Early Jurassic peneplanation process of the Tianshan Mountains was terminated, the major provenance turned back to the North Tianshan from the Central Tianshan, and Bogda Mountains began to uplift slightly. During the deposition of Toutunhe Formation and Qigu Formation, the Bogda Mountains acted one of the predominant provenances of the southern Junggar Basin, and its uplifting related to the collision of Lhasa block with Qiangtang block[56], led to the emergence of thick alluvial fan conglomerates during the deposition of Kalazha Formation. In this period, the rapid uplifting of the North Tianshan, Bogda Mountains and Zhayier Mountains led to the lake shrinkage. Meanwhile, the Junggar Basin started to turn from an extensional to a transpressional one[53,54].

4. Comprehensive analysis on the sedimentary areas in the southern Junggar Basin

4.1. Western part of the southern Junggar Basin

The western part of the southern Junggar Basin mainly consists of Sikeshu sag and the southern Chepaizi uplift (Fig. 1). From the Early Jurassic to the sedimentation of Xishanyao Formation, the heavy mineral assemblages in the western part were mainly composed of stable heavy minerals, e.g. leucoxene, zircon, garnet, tourmaline and apatite. The heavy mineral assemblages with ilmenite were found only at the border between Sikeshu sag and Chepaizi uplift (Fig. 7). In this period, the paleocurrent direction in Sikeshu sag was mostly northward. In addition, trace elements also indicate that the sediments in this period were mainly derived from intermediate acidic-acidic felsic magmatic rocks. Therefore, North Tianshan-Central Tianshan was the major provenance of the western part of the southern Junggar Basin, and the Zhayier Mountains was the secondary provenance during the early Jurassic. In the deposition period of Toutunhe Formation and Qigu Formation, the distribution range of the heavy mineral assemblages with ilmenite as the main composition extended to the south gradually, and a large-scale braided river delta began to develop in the north of Sikeshu sag, while the sediment grain size of Toutunhe Formation in the south of Sikeshu sag was finer. Therefore, it is concluded that during the deposition of Toutunhe Formation-Qigu Formation, the main provenance in the western part of the southern Junggar Basin shifted from the Tianshan to Zhayier Mountains and the effect of the uplifting of North Tianshan on Sikeshu sag was limited (Fig. 11).

4.2. Central part of the southern Junggar Basin

The central part of the southern Junggar Basin mainly consists of Qigu fault belt and the southern Changji sag (Fig. 1). The heavy mineral assemblages from the lower Jurassic to the Xishanyao Formation are mainly composed of leucoxene, zircon, garnet, tourmaline and apatite, indicating that the detrital materials were mainly derived from Late Paleozoic intermediate acidic-acidic volcanic rocks and medium- and low-rank metamorphic rocks of the North Tianshan and Central Tianshan, respectively. ZTR index rose continuously in the lower Jurassic but declined slightly in the Xishanyao Formation. The change of ZTR index, and the change of detrital zircon ages also attest that the predominant provenance shifted from North Tianshan to the Central Tianshan and then back to the North Tianshan again (Fig. 10). Both the increase of epidote and magnetite contents and the decrease of ZTR index indicate that the central part was mainly affected by the uplifting of the North Tianshan at that time. The distribution of detrital zircon U-Pb ages of samples in the central part was mainly from 230 Ma to 320 Ma (Fig. 10), demonstrating that the intermediate acidic-acidic magmatic rocks in North Tianshan from Early Paleozoic were the major provenance then. In a nutshell, the predominant provenance in the central part of the southern Junggar Basin shifted to Central Tianshan from North Tianshan during the early Jurassic and ultimately back to North Tianshan during the Late Jurassic.

4.3. Eastern part of the southern Junggar Basin

The eastern part of the southern Junggar Basin includes Fukang fault belt, Fudong slope belt and the southern Jimusaer sag (Fig. 1). During the early Jurassic, the heavy minerals were mainly composed of leucoxene, ilmenite, zircon and garnet, meanwhile the ZTR index rose continuously. Besides similar ages with the intermediate acidic-acidic magmatic rocks of Late Paleozoic in the North Tianshan, the Badaowan Formation in this area has the unique ophiolite age of 485-520 Ma (Fig. 10), suggesting that there were double-provenance systems in the eastern part of the southern Junggar Basin during the Early Jurassic, i.e., North Tianshan-Central Tianshan in the south and Kalamaili Mountains in the north. This inference is verified by the south-north bidirectional paleocurrents in Fukang fault belt (Fig. 3). During the deposition of Xishanyao Formation, meandering delta front-shore lake facies extensively developed in the whole southern Junggar Basin and the heavy mineral assemblages still inherited the basic mineral types of the Early Jurassic. It should be noted that the content of epidote and magnetite along the northern margin of Bogda Mountains rose. In the meantime, the samples indicating northward paleocurrent direction along the northern margin of Bogda Mountains reduce gradually, and the ZTR index decreased slightly. All these evidences imply that Bogda Mountains began to uplift, but it was not the major provenance of the eastern part of the Junggar Basin yet. The continuous rise of epidote and magnetite content and the sharp decline of ZTR during the deposition of Toutunhe Formation and Qigu Formation indicate that the Bogda Mountains uplifted continuously and became the dominant provenance of the eastern part. The reduction of the ages of early Paleozoic indicates the detrital materials from the Kalamaili Mountains dropped during the late Jurassic.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the random forest classification method for heavy minerals was used to figure out the provenance evolution of the southern Junggar Basin during the Jurassic, combined with ZTR index analysis, sedimentary environment description, detrital zircon dating, paleocurrent directions statistics and trace element analysis. Five major provenances and 3 main sedimentary areas are identified in the Jurassic of the southern Junggar Basin.

The 5 major provenances of Jurassic in the southern Junggar Basin include the North Tianshan, the Central Tianshan, the Zhayier Mountains, the Kalamaili Mountains and the Bogda Mountains. From the Early Jurassic to the lower Xishanyao Formation, the main provenance in the southern Junggar Basin turned gradually from North Tianshan to Central Tianshan and some sediments were derived from Zhayier Mountains and Kalamaili Mountains. In this period, the Bogda region was still the sink area. During the deposition of the upper Xishanyao Formation, the dominant provenance in the southern Junggar Basin turned back to North Tianshan from Central Tianshan, and Bogda Mountains began to uplift. During the deposition of Toutunhe Formation-Qigu Formation, Bogda Mountains uplifted further and became one of the dominant provenances, while North Tianshan, Kalamaili Mountains and Zhayier Mountains still provided the clastic materials to the southern Junggar Basin.

The southern Junggar Basin during the Jurassic had three sink areas, i.e., western part, central part and eastern part of the southern Junggar Basin. The western part had double-provenances characteristics. The sediments were mainly from the North Tianshan during the Early Jurassic and then the inputs of Zhayier Mountains gradually increased during the Middle-Late Jurassic. In the central part, the provenance retreated to Central Tianshan from North Tianshan during the Early Jurassic due to the effect of lake transgression. During the Xishanyao Formation period, the major provenance shifted back to North Tianshan from Central Tianshan. And in the period of Toutunhe Formation and Late Jurassic, North Tianshan was the main provenance. In the eastern part, the sediments in the Early Jurassic were mainly derived from Kalamaili Mountains and Central Tianshan with slight clastic materials from North Tianshan. During the deposition of Xishanyao Formation, Bogda Mountains began to uplift and supplied some source materials. To the period of Toutunhe Formation, Bogda Mountains continued uplifting and became the dominant provenance, and a small amount of sediments was provided by the Central Tianshan. With the further uplifting of Bogda Mountains, the sediments of the Qigu Formation were mainly derived from Bogda Mountains and secondarily from Kalamaili Mountains and North Tianshan.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Reference

BAO Zhidong, LIU Ling, ZHANG Dongling , et al.

Depositional system frameworks of the Jurassic in Junggar Basin

Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2005,23(2):194-202.

[Cited within: 2]

FANG Shihu, GUO Zhaojie, JIA Chengzao , et al.

Meso-Cenozoic heavy minerals’ assemblages in the southern Junggar basin and its implications for basin-orogen pattern

Chinese Journal of Geology, 2006,41(4):648-662.

URL     [Cited within: 3]

The analyses of heavy minerals and their assemblages were carried in practice for two field sections in the southern Junggar Basin, well cores data and two field sections in the inner Tianshan Mountains. Different heavy minerals' assemblages and increasing of unstable heavy minerals during Late Jurassic-earliest Cretaceous, Late Cretaceous and Late Cenozoic might indicate tectonic activity during these three periods. There existed three provenance systems in the southern Junggar Basin and several separated small basin within the Tianshan Mountains during Early-Middle Jurassic. The characteristics of sedimentary systems and heavy minerals proved that the Junggar and Tarim Basins were not physiographically separated by an ancestral version of the Tianshan Mountains during Early-Middle Jurassic. From Late Jurassic to the earliest Cretaceous, the distribution of Upper Jurassic Kalazha conglomerate and Cretaceous bottom conglomerate in front of the Bogda Mountains showed a tectonically active setting and obvious uplift of Tianshan during the latest Jurassic-earliest Cretaceous, and the Bogeda Mountains became another provenance system of the southern Junggar Basin, resulting in widely varied sedimentary successions between the Tarim Basin and the southern Junggar Basin. The basin-orogen pattern of the southern Junggar Basin didn't change greatly until the long-distance effect of India-Asia collision. The Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic activities and evolution of the basin-orogen pattern in the southern Junggar Basin should be related to the collision in the southern margin of the Eurasia plate.

BAI Bin . Tectono-sedimentary evolution and its controls on basic petroleum geological condition of south margin of Junggar. Xi’an: Northwest University, 2008.

[Cited within: 6]

TAN C, YU X, LI S , et al.

Sedimentology and stratigraphic evolution of the fan delta at the Badaowan formation (lower Jurassic), Southern Junggar Basin, Northwest China

Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2016,9(2):115.

DOI:10.1007/s12517-015-2242-4      URL     [Cited within: 2]

Abstract A detailed study of sedimentology and stratigraphic evolution of the fan delta at the Sikeshu section in the southern edge of the Junggar basin was conducted. The fan delta of the Badaowan formation is exposed continuously along the cross section, which shows the stratigraphic and geographic distribution of channel complexes, channel conglomerates and coarse sandstones; flood plain mudstones and thin coal seams, and lacustrine mudstones. Eventually, a fan delta sedimentary model has been established based on the reconstruction of sedimentary characteristics. Based on dissection of the section, channel sand bodies can be divided into three types: amalgamated, transitional, and isolated, which correspond to the origin of braided channels, braided channels transforming into distributary channels (transformation part), and distributary channels respectively. The width (W), thickness (T), and width/thickness ratio (W/T) dimensions of the three types of channel sand bodies were measured in the field. The width, thickness, and width/thickness ratio gradually decrease from amalgamated to isolated sand bodies. The characteristics, sedimentology genesis, and variation of sand bodies are controlled by the variation of base-level cycles and their relevant position. The dimensions of channel sand bodies are proportionate to accommodation/sediment supply (A/S) ratio inversely, which the dimensions decrease with the increase in the A/S ratio. Moreover, the proportion, thickness, connectivity, grain size, and dimensions of channel sand bodies decrease in accompany with the rise of base level.

LI Wei, HU Jianmin, QU Hongjie .

Fission track analysis of Junggar basin peripheral orogen and its geological significance

Acta Geologica Sinica, 2010,84(2):171-182.

DOI:10.1017/S0004972710001772      URL     [Cited within: 1]

Central Asian Orogenic Belt is the world's Phanerozoic crustal growth and transformation of the most significant areas. It is a giant suture zone formed by Paleo-Asian Ocean subduction which located in between the Siberian Plate and Sino-Korean, Tarim Plate.Northern Xinjiang is located in the southern section of Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Today It presents a basin and range landscape. Junggar Basin is located between the Altai Mountain and Tianshan(Figure 1). Paleozoic tectonic evolution of northern Xinjiang to become a hot research topic, however, following the closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean tectonic evolution of intracontinental, in particular Uplift history of the margin of the Junggar Basin is not clear. This paper attempts by the margin of the Junggar Basin, Late Paleozoic magmatic rocks of the apatite, zircon fission-track studies, to reveal the law of uplift of margin of the Junggar Basin since the Mesozoic. PIC

HUANG Yanqing, QIAN Menhui, ZHANG Minwei .

Comprehensive analysis of hydrocarbon accumulation in the southern margin of Sikeshu Sag in Junggar Basin

Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2009,31(5):7-11.

[Cited within: 1]

FANG Y, WU C, WANG Y , et al.

Stratigraphic and sedimentary characteristics of the Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous strata in the Junggar Basin, Central Asia: Tectonic and climate implications

Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2016,129:294-308.

DOI:10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.09.001      URL     [Cited within: 2]

The Junggar Basin, located in northwestern China, provides important records for investigating Mesozoic tectonic and climate evolution in Central Asia. The Upper Jurassic-lowermost Cretaceous strata in the basin include the Qigu, Kalazha, and Qingshuihe Formations in ascending order. By synthesizing outcrop and well data and previous research, we conducted a detailed sedimentologic and stratigraphic correlation analysis for the three formations. Our study shows that a sharp lithofacies change from intermittent braided-river red fine-grained sediments of the Qigu Formation to alluvial fan conglomerates of the Kalazha Formation, is widespread along the basin margins. From bottom to top, the Kalazha alluvial fan conglomerates can be divided into six sequences showing a progradation to retrogradation cycle, and they finally retrograde into the lake sediments of the lowermost Cretaceous Qingshuihe Formation. However, within the Junggar Basin, the Kalazha Formation is commonly considered to be absent and the Qingshuihe Formation possesses a basal fluvial coarse-grained sandstone bed (50 100m), beneath which a widespread unconformity is observed. Stratigraphic correlation suggests that the alluvial fan conglomerates of the Kalazha Formation along the basin margins are equivalent to the basal sandstone bed of the Qingshuihe Formation within the basin. Finally, we conclude that progressive tectonic uplift and climate aridification occurred in the Junggar Basin during deposition of the Qigu Formation in the Late Jurassic, while the basin began to experience a relatively humid climate and underwent rapid subsidence during deposition of the Kalazha Formation in the latest Jurassic-earliest Cretaceous, probably driven by the far-field effects of the short-lived but significant Mongol-Okhotsk collisional orogeny.

GONG Qing . Sedimentary characteristics and tectonic background of the Jurassic in the South and East margin of the Junggar Basin. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2015.

[Cited within: 1]

FANG Shihu, JIA Chengzao, SONG Yan , et al.

Meso-Cenozoic tectonic events and structural constraints in the southern Junggar Basin: Evidence from detrital compositions

Chinese Journal of Geology, 2007,42(4):753-765.

[Cited within: 3]

ZHANG Y Z, LI G, TENG X , et al.

New Jurassic spinicaudatans from Xinjiang uygur autonomous region of northwestern China and their evolutionary implications

Palaeoworld, 2017,26(4):663-671.

DOI:10.1016/j.palwor.2017.04.004      URL     [Cited within: 1]

New Jurassic clam shrimps have been discovered respectively from the Hettangian lower part of the Badaowan Formation in the Junggar Basin, and the Oxfordian upper part of the Qiketai Formation in the Turpan Basin of Xinjiang, northwestern China. Through the examination under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) of well-preserved specimens we have described a new genus Punctatestheria n. gen., which includes two new species P. lianmuqinensis n. gen. n. sp. and P. karamayensis n. gen. n. sp. Given their similar punctate carapace ornamentation pattern, the British Bajocian athonian species Euestheria trotternishensis is herein attributed to the new genus. Punctatestheria n. gen. first occurred in the Hettangian and ranged into the Oxfordian. This finding supports the previous hypothesis that punctatestheriids have first derived from the Triassic lineage Aquilonoglypta , and then gave rise to triglyptids in the Bathonian, because in Triglypta three kinds of ornaments have ontogenetically developed on the carapace, the juvenile-stage dorsal part of which is ornamented by evenly distributed puncta.

ZHU X, LI S, WU D , et al.

Sedimentary characteristics of shallow-water braided delta of the Jurassic, Junggar basin, Western China

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017,149:591-602.

DOI:10.1016/j.petrol.2016.10.054      URL     [Cited within: 1]

61Braided delta in the Junggar basin formed in a shallow water condition with stable tectonic movement, gentle slope gradient, and wide basin.61The shallow water braided delta is characterized by02coarse grain size, large cross bedding, discontinuous normal rhythms, high02sand ratio,02distributary channels with minor mouth bars, and02progradational seismic reflections.61Sedimentary model of the shallow water delta is significant for predicting the distribution of lithologic traps in hydrocarbon exploration.

LI Wei, HU Jianmin, LI Dunpeng , et al.

Analysis of the Late Paleozoic and Mesozoic Paleocurrents and it’s constructional significance of the Northern Bogda Shan, Xinjiang

Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2007,25(2):283-292.

URL     [Cited within: 1]

The northern Bogdashan is located in the south of the Junggar Basin and in the north of Tian Shan. Paleocurrents analysis reveals that paleocurrent direction had three important abrupt transformations from the Neopaleozoic to the Cenozoic. Before the Late Carboniferous, the paleocurrent directions were from north to south. During the Permian, the paleocurrent directions were from west to east or form northwest to southeast. From the Triassic Period to the Jurassic, the paleocurrent directions were from north to south. From the Cretaceous to the Cenozoic, the paleocurrent directions was form south to north. The northern Bogodashan may be divided four tectonic evolution stages form the Neopaleozoic to the Cenozoic by integrated analysis paleocurrent,provenance and sidimentary environment. The transition phase of paleocurrent directions was not only the boundary of each stages of basin tectonic evolution but also important sedimentary record of orogenic belt evolution around the area. Furthermore, the transition time of the paleocurrent directions may restricts when structural belt around Bogodashan had uplifted. At the end of the late Carboniferous, the north western Junggar Basin had be intensity uplift and subsequently sediments fluxes into the basin form west to east. At begin of the Triassic Period, the northern jungar basin was uplifted and it provided clastic sediments for basin from the Triassic to the Jurassic. At the end of the Jurassic, the Bogodashan began to be uplifted and provided clastic sediments for besides of the Bogodashan. Why had the orogenic belt be uplifted clockwise around of the Junggar Basin? It would be researched further.

QIN Liming .

The sedimentary environment and molecular geochemical characteristics of Jurassic source rock in central and southern Junggar Basin

Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2013,31(4):738-746.

URL     [Cited within: 1]

In central and southern Junggar basin,Jurassic source rock is characterized by the large thickness,widespread,whose partial interval have well potential hydrocarbon and exploration.Based on the former study,according to the organic geochemistry and organic petrology experiment analysis method,the distribution characteristics,hydrocarbon potential,biomarker geochemistry and sedimentary environment have been investigated.The results indicate that in western Well Pen 1 depression,the Jurassic formation source rock has worse hydrocarbon potential,in Shawan depression,the Badaowan Formation and Xishanyao Formation have better hydrocarbon potential,but Sangonghe Formation source rock is worse.In Sikeshu depression,Badaowan Formation source rock has better hydrocarbon potential.Additionally,in earlier sedimentary period of Badaowan Formation,the research area developed delta front sub-facies and shore shallow lake facies.In Shawan depression,the formation developed shore shallow facies and limnetic facies with much organic matter input.The source rock is formed in weak oxidation-strong weak sedimentary environment with high plant input.In Sangonghe Formation sedimentary period,the study area distributed shore shallow lake faices,whose source rock is formed in strong oxidation environment with lacustrine high plant input.In Xishanyao Formation sedimentary period,in Mahu depression,Luliang uplift,and Western Well Pen 1 depression distributed delta plain facies and front plain facies.The sedimentary centre moved to eastern and southern depression with sub-deep lake facies,whose source rock is formed in weak oxidation-strong oxidation environment with high lacustrine plant input.

CHEN Bintao, YU Xinghe, WANG Tianqi , et al.

Characteristics of sequence stratigraphy and coal accumulation controlling factors of lower-middle Jurassic coal-bearing series, south margin of Junggar Basin, NW China

Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014,32(1):61-67.

URL     [Cited within: 1]

Combined with few well drilling and well logging data,and results of previous studies,sequence stratigraphy characteristics and coal accumulation controlling factors of Middle-Lower Jurassic coal-bearing series in south margins of Junggar Basin have been analyzed on the basis of sequence stratigraphic study in outcrops. Middle-Lower Jurassic coal-bearing series in south margins of Junggar Basin can be divided into one complete 2ndorder tectonic sequence,where four 3rdorder sequences and twelve system tracts were developed inside. The results show that paleotectonic setting( weakly extensive and gentle subsidence) and paleoclimate( warm,humid,and reducing condition) were the fundamental conditions for coal-forming in Middle-Lower Jurassic. While,relative lake level changes of the 2ndorder tectonic sequence and rate of relative lake level change in the 3rdorder sequence were the major controlling factors for coal accumulation. Commercial recoverable coals,which were characterized by large thickness and stably lateral distribution in outcrops,were all developed in highstand system tract( HST). During the depositional period of SQ1,relative lake level of the 2ndorder tectonic sequence was descending,leading a lower paleo-water table,where the coals were mainly developed in the lower part of HST( ascending rate of the relative lake level in the 3rdorder sequence was moderate). The depositional period of SQ3 was the maximum flooding period of Early-Middle Jurassic, when the relative lake level of the 2ndorder tectonic sequence ascended to the highest point. coal beds were mainly developed in the middle-upper part of HST( descending rate of the relevant lake level in the 3rdorder sequence was moderate).

GREENE T J, CARROLL A R, HENDRIX M S , et al.

Sedimentary record of Mesozoic deformation and inception of the Turpan-Hami basin, northwest China

Geological Society of America Memoirs, 2001,194:317-340.

[Cited within: 1]

JI H, TAO H, WANG Q , et al.

Early to middle Jurassic tectonic evolution of the Bogda Mountains, Northwest China: Evidence from sedimentology and detrital zircon geochronology

Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2018,153:57-74.

DOI:10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.03.018      URL     [Cited within: 5]

The Bogda Mountains, as an important intracontinental orogenic belt, are situated in the southern part of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB), and are a key area for understanding the Mesozoic evolution of the CAOB. However, the tectonic evolution of the Bogda Mountains remains controversial during the Mesozoic Era, especially the Early to Middle Jurassic Periods. The successive Lower to Middle Jurassic strata are well preserved and exposed along the northern flank of the Western Bogda Mountains and record the uplift processes of the Bogda Mountains. In this study, we analysed sedimentary facies combined with detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology at five sections of Lower to Middle Jurassic strata to detect the tectonic evolution and changes of provenance in the Bogda area. During Early to Middle Jurassic times, the fluvial, deltaic and lacustrine environments dominated in the western section of the Bogda area. The existence of Early Triassic peak age indicates that the Bogda Mountains did not experience uplift during the period of early Badaowan Formation deposition. The Early Triassic to Late Permian granitoid plutons and Carboniferous volcanic rocks from the Barkol and Santanghu areas were the main provenances. The significant change in the U-Pb age spectrum implies that the Eastern Bogda Mountains initiated uplift in the period of late Badaowan Formation deposition, and the Eastern Junggar Basin and the Turpan-Hami Basin were partially partitioned. The Eastern Bogda Mountains gradually became the major provenance. From the period of early Sangonghe to early Toutunhe Formations deposition, the provenance of the sediments and basin-range frame were similar to that of late Badaowan. However, the Eastern Bogda Mountains suffered intermittent uplift three times, and successive denudation. The uplifts respectively happened in early Sangonghe, late Sangonghe to early Xishanyao, and late Xishanyao to early Toutunhe. During the deposition stage of Toutunhe Formation, a relatively strong tectonic reactivation took place along the Late Palaeozoic Bogda rift belt accompanied by relatively large-scale magmatism. The distinct basement structure between the eastern and western Bogda rift could be the structure basis of difference uplift in the Bogda area during the Mesozoic Era. The Early to Middle Jurassic episodic uplift of Eastern Bogda Mountains perhaps was related to the post-collisional convergence of the Qiangtang Block from late Badaowan to early Sangonghe, the closure of the western Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean at the Early-Middle Jurassic boundary and the tectonic accretion at the south Asian margin of Pamir Block during late Middle Jurassic times.

LI Wei . The mechanic and tectonic evolution of Mesozoic Basins in northwestern Junggar orogenic belt. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 2007.

[Cited within: 1]

MA Qingyou . The tectonic characteristics of Bogeda Mountain and its orogeny at Mesozoic-Cenozoic time. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2006.

[Cited within: 1]

ZHANG Chuanheng, LIU Dianbo, ZHANG Chuanlin , et al.

Stratigraphic constraints on the initial uplift age of Bogda Shan, Xinjiang, north-west China

Earth Science Frontiers, 2005,12(1):294-302.

URL     [Cited within: 1]

The Bogda Shan, located on the northern margin of East Tianshan, forms the watershed between the Junggar basin and the Chaiwopu depression. Its initial uplift time has been debated for a long time, and is of important geotectonic significance.Field surveys and seismic exploration show that the lowest regional angular unconformity older than the Carboniferous developed between the Cretaceous and the pre-Cretaceous strata. Several measurements have been made of cross-bedding and stoss surfaces of imbricate pebbles. Statistical analysis of the data indicates that a major change in sediment dispersal pattern occurred at the end of the Jurassic or the beginning of the Cretaceous. In the Jurassic, the sediment dispersal pattern is convergent, and the Bogda area functioned as a water catchment. In the Cretaceous, the sediment dispersal pattern is divergent, and the Bogda area functioned as a watershed. A statistical study of the composition of clasts in the Jurassic and Cretaceous conglomerates suggests that these Cretaceous conglomerates are different from the Jurassic conglomerates, and are composed mainly of volcanic gravels derived from nearby areas. On the basis of these studies we conclude that the initial uplift of Bogda Shan took place between the latest Jurassic and the earliest Cretaceous.Therefore we suggest that 1the Bogda Shan is not an integral part of the Tianshan orogenic belt; and 2 the Chaiwopu depression is part of the early Mesozoic Junggar Basin.

ZHENG Youwei, GUO Jianming, ZHENG Jianjing , et al.

Late Paleozoic tentonic framework and evolution process of Bogda tectonic belt in XinJiang

Contribution to Geology and Mineral Resources Research, 2015,30(4):588-593.

URL     [Cited within: 1]

Based on previous data,field investigation in Bogda area and systematic study on petrology,stratigraphy and sedimentation of Bogda tectonic belt we consider that Bogda mountain area was exposed to the early carboniferous initial rift evolution,late carboniferous mature rift valley evolution,the early Permian orogenic evolution and the late early Permian post-orogenic evolution.

LI Linlin, GUO Zhaojie, GUAN Shuwei , et al.

Heavy mineral assemblage characteristics and the Cenozoic paleogeographic evolution in southwestern Qaidam Basin

SCIENCE CHINA: Earth Sciences, 2015,58(6):859-875.

DOI:10.1007/s11430-014-5050-x      URL     [Cited within: 1]

Based on the analysis of heavy mineral assemblages in Cenozoic southwestern Qaidam Basin, we found that different areas have variable heavy mineral assemblage characteristics, which suggested that there were two source areas he Altyn Mountains and the Qimen Tagh-East Kunlun Mountains. In Ganchaigou-Shizigou-Huatugou (Area A), which was mainly source from the Altyn Mountains, its heavy minerals were mainly composed of zircon, Ti-oxides, and wollastonite in the Paleocene-early Eocene and mainly of unstable minerals, especially amphibole, in the middle Eocene-Oligene. Since the late Oligocene-Miocene, the heavy minerals were still mainly unstable minerals, but the content of epidote increased and the content of amphibole decreased. In Qigequan-Hongliuquan (Area B), which was the mixed source from the Altyn Mountains and the Qimen Tagh-East Kunlun Mountains, its heavy minerals were mainly garnet, epidote, and amphibole. The source of L caotan-Dongchaishan-Kunbei (Area C) was mainly from the Qimen Tagh-East Kunlun Mountains, heavy minerals in the sediments in Area C were mainly zircon and Ti-oxides in Paleogene and garnet, epidote, and amphibole in Neogene. In Yuejin-Youshashan (Area D), where the stable minerals and unstable minerals were present simultaneously, the heavy mineral assemblages was controlled by multi-direction source. The variation of heavy mineral assemblages in southwestern Qaidam Basin shows that Altyn Mountains was of low-lying topographic relief in Paleocene-early Eocene, and the rapid uplift of Altyn Mountains started from the middle Eocene. In Paleogene, the Altyn Tagh Fault had a slow strike-slip velocity, but the strike-slip velocity increased greatly since the late Oligocene, leading to a strike-slip displacement above 300 km since Neogene. Meanwhile, the Qimen Tagh-East Kunlun fault zone was under a stable tectonic stage in Paleogene with the Qimen Tagh Mountain being low-lying hills; since the late Oligocene, the fault zone started to activate and the Qimen Tagh Mountain began to uplift rapidly.

LIN Tong, WANG Dongliang, WANG Lan , et al.

Factors influencing deep favorable reservoirs on the southern margin of Junggar Basin, Xinjiang Province

Geological Bulletin of China, 2013,40(3):909-918.

URL     [Cited within: 1]

There are abundant hydrocarbon resources on the southern margin of Junggar Basin; nevertheless,most of the oil and gas fields were found only in the shallow layer,and the oil and gas reservoirs are very limited. The exploration of the middle-low layers has not made breakthrough. In order to expand the area of exploration,researchers have made lots of studies which are mainly focused on the structural styles. For the purpose of solving this problem,the authors emphatically investigated the reservoir characteristics and the controlling factors of deep reservoirs. Detailed information was acquired by the authors by using such means as casting thin sec tions,scanning electron microscope(SEM),permeability and porosity test,and fluid inclusion test,combined with carbon and oxygen isotope analysis and vitrinite reflectance(Ro). Studies show that the favorable areas of deep reservoirs are controlled by the sedimentary facies,the distal bars are the best reservoirs in Qingshuihe Formation,and the effective reservoirs of Qigu Formation are located in the upper part of distributary channel sand bodies. The lower paleogeothermal gradient,the less influence of regional tectonic stress and the quick burial in late period of burial process have greatly improved the deep reservoirs on the south margin of Junggar Basin.

WAN Yanzhou, ZHOU Lifa, BAI Bin , et al.

Provenance analysis of Shuixigou Group in southern margin of Junggar Basin

Lithologic Reservoirs, 2009,21(2):35-41.

URL    

Based on systematic analysis of conglomerate constituent,paleocurrent direction,detrital composition,heavy mineral and major element,the provenance characteristics of Shuixigou Group in southern margin of Junggar Basin are studied.The analysis of conglomerate component of Shuixigou Group shows that Yilinhabierga Mountain,northern Tianshan Mountains and northern margin fault of central Tianshan Mountains were the source areas in the sedimentary period of Badaowan and Xishanyao Formation.The paleocurrent analytical data of Shuixigou Group show that paleocurrent directions of Badaowan Formation and Xishanyao Formation are mainly northeast and west,so Yilinhabierga Mountain is the primary source area.The paleocurrent directions of Sangonghe Formation are mainly SSW and SE, which indicates that Bogda Mountain and Yilinhabierga Mountain are not the primary source area in that period. Shuixigou Group in the western and eastern segment of the southern margin of Junggar Basin has heavy mineral assemblage of basic magmatic rocks,which shows that the material supply might be from the northern Tianshan Mountains.The middle segment of the southern margin of Junggar Basin has genetic features of medium-acidic magmatite and basic magmatic rocks,which shows that the source area is in Bogda Mountain.

ZHENG Youwei, WANG Yadong, GUO Jianming , et al.

Heavy mineral evolution characteristics of Jurassic deposits in the southeastern margin of the Junggar Basin and its response to Bogda Mountains Uplift

Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016,34(6):1147-1154.

URL     [Cited within: 1]

Junggar basin is one of the largest petroliferous basins in China,although a series of oil and gas fields had been found in the south of the basin,the oil-gas exploration in the fore mountain belt of Bogda Mountain did not make great breakthroughs. The reason may be associated with the few awareness of the evolution of the Bogda Mountain to control,restrain the evolution of the late peripheral sags and the hydrocarbon generation and the basin formation. The conservative fragmentary materials in sedimentary basins had recorded the lithosphere features of the orogenic belts at the margin of the South China block and kinetics characterization of basins during the sedimentary evolution. At the same time,as sedimentary heavy minerals were very stable and they had been participating in this long and complicated geological processes,which could provide the important information to the source rocks. Thus,in this text,based on the mineral petrology characteristics of heavy minerals,such as roundings,content changes,combination features and the different heavy mineral indexes,to study the uplift processes of Bogda Mountain in the period of Jurassic,which could provide strong evidence that Bogda Mountain uplifted in Toutunhe Formation of Middle Jurassic. Moreover,according to the features of heavy minerals,the tectonic evolution stages of Bogda Mountain during Jurassic period were divided into two parts: 1) from early Jurassic to the late period of middle Jurassic,the tectonic evolution was relatively stable,and 2) from the late period of middle Jurassic to late Jurassic,tectonic uplifting was strong. In addition,combined with the previous research results such as tectono-thermochronology,U-Pb age and paleocurrent,we considered that the provenances of Bogda area were from Kalameili Montain during early Jurassic to the late period of middle Jurassic and Bogda Mountain during the late period of middle Jurassic to late Jurassic. And that,in the later period,the Bogda Mountain had been uplifted.

BREIMAN L .

Random forests

Machine Learning, 2001,45(1):5-32

DOI:10.1023/A:1010933404324      URL     [Cited within: 3]

YANG W, JOLIVET M, DUPONT-NIVET G , et al.

Source to sink relations between the Tian Shan and Junggar Basin (northwest China) from Late Palaeozoic to Quaternary: Evidence from detrital U-Pb zircon geochronology

Basin Research, 2012,25(2):219-240.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2117.2012.00558.x      URL     [Cited within: 2]

The tectonic evolution of the Tian Shan, as for most ranges in continental Asia is dominated by north-south compression since the Cenozoic India-Asia collision. However, precollision governing tectonic processes remain enigmatic. An excellent record is provided by thick Palaeozoic – Cenozoic lacustrine to fluvial depositional sequences that are well preserved in the southern margin of the Junggar Basin and exposed along a foreland basin associated to the Late Cenozoic rejuvenation of the Tian Shan ranges. U/Pb (LA-ICP-MS) dating of detrital zircons from 14 sandstone samples from a continuous series ranging in age from latest Palaeozoic to Quaternary is used to investigate changes in sediment provenance through time and to correlate them with major tectonic phases in the range. Samples were systematically collected along two nearby sections in the foreland basin. The results show that the detrital zircons are mostly magmatic in origin, with some minor input from metamorphic zircons. The U-Pb detrital zircon ages range widely from 127 to 2856 Ma and can be divided into four main groups: 127–197 (sub-peak at 159 Ma), 250–379 (sub-peak at 318 Ma), 381–538 (sub-peak at 406 Ma) and 543–2856 Ma (sub-peak at 912 Ma). These groups indicate that the zircons were largely derived from the Tian Shan area to the south since a Late Carboniferous basin initiation. The provenance and basin-range pattern evolution of the southern margin of Junggar Basin can be generally divided into four stages: (1) Late Carboniferous – Early Triassic basin evolution in a half-graben or post-orogenic extensional context; (2) From Middle Triassic to Upper Jurassic times, the southern Junggar became a passively subsiding basin until (3) being inverted during Lower Cretaceous – Palaeogene; (4) During the Neogene, a piedmont developed along the northern margin of the North Tian Shan block and Junggar Basin became a true foreland basin.

DING A N, HUI R Y, ZHANG Z N .

Hydrocarbon potential of Jurassic source rocks in the Junggar Basin, NW China

Journal of Petroleum Geology, 2003,26(3):307-324.

DOI:10.1111/j.1747-5457.2003.tb00032.x      URL     [Cited within: 1]

Jurassic source rocks in the Junggar Basin (NW China) include coal swamp and freshwater lacustrine deposits. Hydrocarbon-generating macerals in the coal swamp deposits are dominated by desmocollinite and exinite of higher-plant origin. In lacustrine facies, macerals consists of bacterially-altered amorphinite, algal- amorphinite, alginite, exinite and vitrinite. Coals and coaly mudstones in the Lower Jurassic Badaowan Formation generate oil at the Qigu oilfield on the southern margin of the basin. Lacustrine source rocks generate oil at the Cainan oilfield in the centre of the basin.

LI S L, YU X H, TAN C P , et al.

Jurassic sedimentary evolution of southern Junggar Basin: Implication for palaeoclimate changes in northern Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China

Journal of Palaeogeography, 2014,3(2):145-161.

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1261.2014.00049      URL     [Cited within: 1]

Junggar Basin, located in northern Xinjiang, presents continuous and multikilometer-thick strata of the Jurassic deposits. The Jurassic was entirely terrestrial fluvial and lacustrine deltaic sedimentation. Eight outcrop sections across the Jurassic strata were measured at a resolution of meters in southern Junggar Basin. Controlling factors of sedimentary evolution and palaeoclimate changes in Junggar Basin during the Jurassic were discussed based on lithology, fossils and tectonic setting. In the Early to Middle Jurassic, the warm and wide Tethys Sea generated a strong monsoonal circulation over the central Asian continent, and provided adequate moisture for Junggar Basin. Coal-bearing strata of the Badaowan, Sangonghe, and Xishanyao Formations were developed under warm and humid palaeoclimate in Junggar Basin. In the late Middle Jurassic, Junggar Basin was in a semi-humid and semi-arid environment due to global warming event. Stratigraphy in the upper part of the Middle Jurassic with less plant fossils became multicolor or reddish from dark color sediments. During the Late Jurassic, collision of Lhasa and Qiangtang Block obstructed monsoon from the Tethys Sea. A major change in climate from semi-humid and semi-arid to arid conditions took place, and reddish strata of the Upper Jurassic were developed across Junggar Basin.

BREIMAN L .

Bagging predictors

Machine Learning, 1996,26(2):123-140.

[Cited within: 1]

VERIKAS A, GELZINIS A, BACAUSKIENE M .

Mining data with random forests: A survey and results of new tests

Pattern Recognition, 2011,44(2):330-349.

DOI:10.1016/j.patcog.2010.08.011      URL     [Cited within: 1]

Random forests (RF) has become a popular technique for classification, prediction, studying variable importance, variable selection, and outlier detection. There are numerous application examples of RF in a variety of fields. Several large scale comparisons including RF have been performed. There are numerous articles, where variable importance evaluations based on the variable importance measures available from RF are used for data exploration and understanding. Apart from the literature survey in RF area, this paper also presents results of new tests regarding variable rankings based on RF variable importance measures. We studied experimentally the consistency and generality of such rankings. Results of the studies indicate that there is no evidence supporting the belief in generality of such rankings. A high variance of variable importance evaluations was observed in the case of small number of trees and small data sets.

SHI Z, LI P, SUN Y . An outlier generation approach for one-class random forests: An example in one-class classification of remote sensing imagery. Beijing: 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2016.

[Cited within: 1]

RODRIGUEZ-GALIANO V F, GHIMIRE B, ROGAN J , et al.

An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2012,67(1):93-104.

DOI:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.11.002      URL     [Cited within: 2]

Land cover monitoring using remotely sensed data requires robust classification methods which allow for the accurate mapping of complex land cover and land use categories. Random forest (RF) is a powerful machine learning classifier that is relatively unknown in land remote sensing and has not been evaluated thoroughly by the remote sensing community compared to more conventional pattern recognition techniques. Key advantages of RF include: their non-parametric nature; high classification accuracy; and capability to determine variable importance. However, the split rules for classification are unknown, therefore RF can be considered to be black box type classifier. RF provides an algorithm for estimating missing values; and flexibility to perform several types of data analysis, including regression, classification, survival analysis, and unsupervised learning. In this paper, the performance of the RF classifier for land cover classification of a complex area is explored. Evaluation was based on several criteria: mapping accuracy, sensitivity to data set size and noise. Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper data captured in European spring and summer were used with auxiliary variables derived from a digital terrain model to classify 14 different land categories in the south of Spain. Results show that the RF algorithm yields accurate land cover classifications, with 92% overall accuracy and a Kappa index of 0.92. RF is robust to training data reduction and noise because significant differences in kappa values were only observed for data reduction and noise addition values greater than 50 and 20%, respectively. Additionally, variables that RF identified as most important for classifying land cover coincided with expectations. A McNemar test indicates an overall better performance of the random forest model over a single decision tree at the 0.00001 significance level.

HUANG Fei . A research on volcanic lithofacies and characteristics of volcanic reservoir of carboniferous, in the northwest edge of Junggar Basin. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2011.

[Cited within: 1]

XU Xin, CHEN Chuan, DING Tianfu , et al.

Discovery of Lisa basalt northwestern edge of Junggar Basin and it’s geological significance

Xinjiang Geology, 2008,26(1):9-16.

WANG X, WANG X, MA Y .

Differential exhumation history of Bogda Mountain, Xinjiang, Northwestern China since the Late Mesozoic

Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007,81(11):1507-1517.

DOI:10.1016/S1872-5791(07)60044-X      URL    

Apatite fission track analysis and thermal history modeling of nine sandstone samples collected from diverse structure belts of the Bogda Mountain reveal an orogenic process of upper crust and a differential exhumation history of the Bogda Mountain since Late Mesozoic. The orogenic process of upper crust of the Bogda Mountain is characterized by that the propagation sequences of thrust structures are piggyback within the detached belt and overstep within the basement-involved belt. Main tectonic uplifts of the Bogda Mountain since Late Mesozoic occurred at 155~135Ma, 90~70Ma,~40Ma and~10Ma, respectively. Correspondingly, uplift and exhumation history of the Bogda Mountain experienced three main stages, e.g. an initially integral uplift stage at the Early Yanshan epoch (with 0.83~1.2 km of amount denuded), a slow elevation stage at the Late Yanshan epoch (with 0.68~0.83 km of amount denuded) and a tremendously differential exhumation at the Late Himalayan epoch (with ~5.0 km of amount denuded in the overthrust belt, 1.82~3.18 km in the basement involved belt, and ~2.73 km in the detachment belt, respectively. The detachment belt presents characters of rapider cooling and higher denudation ratio due to a later starting exhumation time. Regional deformation was closely related to collision and accretion of the terrains in the south Asian continental margin since Late Mesozoic.

YANG S H, ZHOU M F .

Geochemistry of the 430-Ma Jingbulake mafic-ultramafic intrusion in Western Xinjiang, NW China: Implications for subduction related magmatism in the South Tianshan orogenic belt

Lithos, 2009,113(1/2):259-273.

DOI:10.1016/j.lithos.2009.07.005      URL    

XIAO W, HAN C, YUAN C , et al.

Middle Cambrian to Permian subduction-related accretionary orogenesis of Northern Xinjiang, NW China: Implications for the tectonic evolution of central Asia

Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2008,32(2/3/4):102-117.

DOI:10.1016/j.jseaes.2007.10.008      URL     [Cited within: 1]

Middle-Cambrian to Permian subduction-related records are widely distributed in Northern Xinjiang which can be grouped into the Chinese Altay–East Junggar–Eastern Tien Shan, West Junggar, Yili, and Tarim domains. By integrating paleogeographic and geological data, we suppose that the Chinese Altay–East Junggar–Eastern Tien Shan domain was more closely located to Siberia, while the West Junggar and Yili domains occupied an intermediate position near the Kazakhstan block in the early Paleozoic Paleoasian Ocean. Distribution of Andean-type magmatic arcs, island arcs, accretionary wedges, ophiolitic slices, and/or microcontinents shows an archipelago paleogeography forming a huge accretionary active margin sequences. The Tarim domain was on the opposite side of the early Paleozoic Paleoasian Ocean remaining passive margin. These tectonic units drifted northwards and approached the southern active margin of the Siberian craton in the late Paleozoic, leading to termination of the Paleoasian Ocean and formation of a complicated orogenic collage between Siberian craton and the Tarim block between the end-Permian and Triassic. These multiple accretion processes significantly contributed to the lateral growth of central Asia.

HAN B F, GUO Z J, ZHANG Z C , et al.

Age, geochemistry, and tectonic implications of a late Paleozoic stitching pluton in the north Tian Shan suture zone, western China

Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2010,122(3/4):627-640.

DOI:10.1130/B26491.1      URL     [Cited within: 1]

\0

WANG X, CAI K, SUN M , et al.

Two contrasting late Paleozoic magmatic episodes in the northwestern Chinese Tianshan Belt, NW China: Implication for tectonic transition from plate convergence to intra-plate adjustment during accretionary orogenesis

Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2017,153:118-138.

DOI:10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.03.013      URL    

Late Carboniferous to Early Permian is a critical period for the final amalgamation of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB). However, as most of the accreted terranes of the CAOB are unclear in tectonic nature and origin, the timing and processes of their mutual amalgamation have been poorly constrained. To understand assembly of the West Junggar Terrane with the Yili Block, a suite of the late Paleozoic magmatic rocks, including ignimbrite, rhyolite and granite, in northwestern Chinese Tianshan Belt were studied for their petrogenesis and tectonic implications. Our new results of secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) zircon U-Pb dating reveal two separate magmatic episodes, ca. 30002Ma volcanism (ignimbrite and rhyolite) and ca. 28802Ma plutonsim (biotite granite). Geochemically, for the ca. 30002Ma volcanism, the ignimbrites have low SiO 2 (65.8–71.502wt.%) and Mg # (6–13) values, and exhibit arc affinity with significantly enriched in large ion lithophile elements (LILE) and depleted in high field strength elements (HFSE) such as Nb, Ta and Ti. The whole-rock ε Nd (t) and zircon ε Hf (t) values range from +6.9 to +7.0 and +9.9 to +14.1 respectively, indicating a juvenile basaltic lower crustal origin. Rhyolites have slightly high SiO 2 (72.7–74.002wt.%) and K 2 O (3.86–4.5302wt.%) contents, high zircon δ 18 O (11.67–13.23‰) values, and low whole-rock ε Nd (t) (+2.9 to +3.8) and zircon ε Hf (t) (+2.8 to +10.0) values, which may suggest sediment involvements during magma generation. In contrast, for the ca. 28802Ma plutonism, the biotite granites have obviously higher SiO 2 (74.7–75.502wt.%) contents and whole-rock ε Nd (t) (+7.7 to +8.8), zircon ε Hf (t) (+9.8 to +12.7), and lower zircon δ 18 O (5.99–6.84‰) values, than those of the ca. 30002Ma volcanic rocks, which are consistent with signatures of juvenile magma source. According to our estimates of zircon saturation temperatures, together with their contrasting genesis, we attribute the formation of ca. 30002Ma high temperature (815–93802°C) volcanism to oceanic slab break-off during assembly of the West Junggar Terrane with the Yili Block, and relate the generation of ca. 28802Ma low temperature (723–73502°C) plutonism to subsequent strike-slipping of North Tianshan Fault that facilitated introduction of water-fluxes triggering hydrous partial melting of juvenile lower crust. The sequential magmatic episodes in the northwestern Chinese Tianshan Belt may provide a crucial clue to a tectonic transition from plate convergence to intra-plate adjustment during the formation of the Kazakhstan Orocline in the late Paleozoic.

WALI G, WANG B, CLUZEL D , et al.

Carboniferous-Early Permian magmatic evolution of the Bogda Range (Xinjiang, NW China): Implications for the Late Paleozoic accretionary tectonics of the SW Central Asian orogenic belt

Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2018,153:238-251.

DOI:10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.07.045      URL    

The Late Paleozoic magmatic evolution of the Bogda Range (Chinese North Tianshan) is important for understanding the accretionary history of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. We investigated the Carboniferous and Lower Permian volcanic and sedimentary sequences of the Daheyan section, southern Bogda Range, and present new zircon U-Pb ages and whole-rock geochemical data for the volcanic rocks. One Carboniferous rhyolite is dated at 298 8 Ma; a Permian basalt yielded many Proterozoic zircon xenocrysts, and its maximum age ( 297 Ma) is constrained by the detrital zircon ages of the sandstone that stratigraphically underlies it. These volcanic rocks belong to calc-alkaline series. We further synthesize previous geochronological, geochemical and isotopic data of magmatic and sedimentary rocks in the Bogda Range. The available data indicate that the magmatism occurred continuously from 350 Ma to 280 Ma. A comprehensive analysis allows us to propose that: (1) the Carboniferous to Early Permian magmatic rocks of the Bogda Range generally show consistent arc-type features; (2) increasing mantle input through time suggests intra-arc extension in a supra-subduction zone; (3) the localized occurrence of Early Permian alkaline pillow basalts and deep water sediments close to the major shear zone advocate a transtensional crustal thinning during the transition from Carboniferous convergence to Early Permian transcurrent tectonics; (4) occurrence of a large number of Proterozoic zircon xenocrysts in the Late Paleozoic magmatic rocks, and Proterozoic detrital zircons in the coeval clastic sediments suggest a continental or transitional basement of the Bogda Arc; (5) subduction in the Bogda area terminated prior to the deposition of Middle Permian terrestrial sediments.

LU Miao’an . Multistage evolution of the basin-and-range structure of the eastern section of the Tianshan Mountains. Beijing: Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, 2007.

WANG J, WU C, LI Z , et al.

Whole-rock geochemistry and zircon Hf isotope of Late Carboniferous-Triassic sediments in the Bogda region, NW China: Clues for provenance and tectonic setting

Geological Journal, 2018: 1-25.

[Cited within: 4]

SU C Q, SUN Y J, YANG X K , et al.

Definition of some unconformities in the Late Paleozoic-Mesozoic system in the Houxia-Ewirgol area, Tianshan Mountains, and its geological significance

Geological Bulletin of China, 2006,25(8):977-985.

[Cited within: 1]

ALLEN M B, WINDLEY B F, ZHANG C .

Palaeozoic collisional tectonics and magmatism of the Chinese Tien Shan, central Asia

Tectonophysics, 1993,220(1/2/3/4):89-115.

DOI:10.1016/0040-1951(93)90225-9      URL     [Cited within: 1]

The Chinese Tien Shan range is a Palaeozoic orogenic belt which contains two collision zones. The older, southern collision accreted a north-facing passive continental margin on the north side of the Tarim Block to an active continental margin on the south side of an elongate continental tract, the Central Tien Shan. Collision occurred along the Qinbulak-Qawabulak Fault (Southern Tien Shan suture). The time of the collision is poorly constrained, but was probably in in the Late Devonian-Early Carboniferous. We propose this age because of a major disconformity at this time along the north side of the Tarim Block, and because the Youshugou ophiolite is imbricated with Middle Devonian sediments. A younger, probably Late Carboniferous-Early Permian collision along the North Tien Shan Fault (Northern Tien Shan suture) accreted the northern side of the Central Tien Shan to an island arc which lay to its north, the North Tien Shan arc. This collision is bracketed by the Middle Carboniferous termination of arc magmatism and the appearance of Late Carboniferous or Early Permian elastics in a foreland basin developed over the extinct arc. Thrust sheets generated by the collision are proposed as the tectonic load responsible for the subsidence of this basin. Post-collisional, but Palaeozoic, dextral shear occurred along the northern suture zone, this was accompanied by the intrusion of basic and acidic magmas in the Central Tien Shan. Late Palaeozoic basic igneous rocks from all three lithospheric blocks represented in the Tien Shan possess chemical characteristics associated with generation in supra-subduction zone environments, even though many post-date one or both collisions. Rocks from each block also possess distinctive trace element chemistries, which supports the three-fold structural division of the orogenic belt. It is unclear whether the chemical differences represent different source characteristics, or are due to different episodes of magmatism being juxtaposed by later dextral strike-slip fault motions. Because the southern collision zone in the Tien Shan is the older of the two, the Tarim Block sensu stricto collided not with the Eurasian landmass, but with a continental block which was itself separated from Eurasia by at least one ocean. The destruction of this ocean in Late Carboniferous-Early Permian times represented the final elimination of all oceanic basins from this part of central Asia.

ALLEN M B, WINDLEY B F, CHI Z , et al.

Basin evolution within and adjacent to the Tien Shan range, NW China

Journal of the Geological Society, 1991,148(2):369-378.

DOI:10.1144/gsjgs.148.2.0369      URL     [Cited within: 1]

DUMITRU T A, ZHOU D, CHANG E Z , et al.

Uplift, exhumation, and deformation in the

Chinese Tian Shan. 2001,194:71-99.

[Cited within: 1]

FANG Y, WU C, GUO Z , et al.

Provenance of the southern Junggar Basin in the Jurassic: Evidence from detrital zircon geochronology and depositional environments

Sedimentary Geology, 2015,315(1):47-63.

DOI:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2014.10.014      URL     [Cited within: 2]

61Provenance of the southern Junggar Basin in the Jurassic.61Combine detrital zircon U-Pb ages with depositional environments.61Confirm a late Jurassic volcanic activity in the Tian Shan.

WANG S J, WANG J L .

The geochemical characteristics and chronology of the K-feldspar granite in Baluntai area, Xinjiang

Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2010,40(1):105-110.

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1084.2010.00199      URL     [Cited within: 1]

Aim To study the geochemistry characteristics,zircon U-Pb chronology and the geological significance of the K-feldspar granite in northern Baluntai area.Methods Based on the geological investigation,geochemistry analysis and LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating about the K-feldspar granite,the geological significance of the K-feldspar granite has been studied.Results The K-feldspar granite has the characteristics of island-arc granites,and formed at 369.5 Ma 2.6 Ma.Conclusion The paleo-southern Tianshan ocean lithosphere had been subducting beneath the Yili-middle Tianshan block from Silurian to late Devonian.

ZHANG Y, PE-PIPER G, PIPER D J W , et al.

Early Carboniferous collision of the Kalamaili orogenic belt, North Xinjiang, and its implications: Evidence from molasse deposits

Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2013,125(5/6):932-944.

DOI:10.1130/B30779.1      URL     [Cited within: 1]

LIU Xiaohu . The evolution of dynamic structural belt in Kalamaili Mountains in the Junggar Basin. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2016.

[Cited within: 1]

ZHANG Y Y, GUO Z J, PE-PIPER G , et al.

Geochemistry and petrogenesis of Early Carboniferous volcanic rocks in East Junggar, North Xinjiang: Implications for post-collisional magmatism and geodynamic process

Gondwana Research, 2015,28(4):1466-1481.

DOI:10.1016/j.gr.2014.08.018      URL     [Cited within: 1]

61Early Carboniferous volcanic rocks in the Kalamaili orogen are post-collisional.61Post-collisional setting started in Tournaisian in East Junggar.61Slab breakoff at 34563330Ma was the geodynamic process producing volcanism.613 groups of mafic rocks from calc-alkaline to potassic alkaline are interpreted.

LIU Q, ZHU H, SHU Y , et al.

Provenance identification and sedimentary analysis of the beach and bar systems in the Palaeogene of the Enping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin, South China Sea

Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016,70:251-272.

DOI:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.12.002      URL     [Cited within: 1]

61Indicate the types and dispersal characteristics of provenance systems quantitatively.61Identify the facies characteristics of the beach and bar sandbodies.61Reveal the planar dispersal patterns of beach-bar sedimentary systems and their spatial-temporal evolution.

YANG Y, GUO Z, LUO Y .

Middle-Late Jurassic tectonostratigraphic evolution of Central Asia, implications for the collision of the Karakoram-Lhasa Block with

Asia. Earth-Science Reviews, 2017,166:83-110.

DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.01.005      URL     [Cited within: 3]

Mesozoic basins in different regions of Central Asia provide important records for investigating relationships between intraplate deformation in Central Asia and tectonic processes at Asian boundaries. The present study gives a review of the stratigraphic and structural evolution of basins in different regions of Central Asia during the Middle-Late Jurassic. It is shown that basins and mountain belts in northwest China experienced compressional deformation and were wholly or partially uplifted during the late Middle-Late Jurassic. Compared to extensively-distributed Middle Jurassic coal-bearing strata in northwest China, Upper Jurassic strata characterized by red mudstones and conglomerates have a much smaller distribution. In the mean time, the Tibet-Pamir plateau also underwent a folding and uplift event, and Upper Jurassic sedimentary rocks are generally missing in the Pamir and western Tibet. The intense compressional deformation and uplift event of the late Middle-Late Jurassic from the Tibet-Pamir plateau to northwest China requires a new tectonic model, as proposed here. We suggest that the Karakoram and Lhasa blocks were a single giant block, which was accreted to Asia in the late Middle Jurassic-earliest Cretaceous and cross-cut by the Karakoram Fault in the Cenozoic. During the Callovian, the western part of the Karakoram-Lhasa Block initially collided with the southern Asian margin. Collision and continued convergence during the late Middle-Late Jurassic caused sinistral strike-slip faulting along the Central Badakhshan Fault and South Tian Shan Suture, accommodating crustal shortening in areas to the southeast of the faults: the Pamir, western Tibet, Tarim Block, Qilian-Qaidam Block, and Bei Shan. Meanwhile, the northeastward transpressional motion of the Tarim Block produced strong compressional stresses to areas north of the Tarim Block: the Kyrgyz Tian Shan, Central Tian Shan, Junggar Basin, and Turfan Basin. With the northward movement of the Karakoram-Lhasa Block, the eastern part of the Karakoram-Lhasa Block began to collide with the southern Asian margin during the latest Jurassic-earliest Cretaceous, resulting in strong crustal deformation and thickening in East Asia and Central Asia.

HENDRIX M S, DUMITRU T A, GRAHAM S A .

Late Oligocene-early Miocene unroofing in the Chinese Tian Shan: An early effect of the India-Asia collision

Geology, 1994,22(6):487-490.

DOI:10.1130/0091-7613(1994)022<0487:LOEMUI>2.3.CO;2      URL     [Cited within: 2]

Apatite fission-track data indicate that Mesozoic strata exposed on the northern flank of the Chinese Tian Shan underwent 藴4-5 km of late Cenozoic unroofing, beginning at 24 Ma. This age apparently dates initial reactivation of the northern Tian Shan in response to the India-Asia collision, which continues to raise the mountain range today. Numerous studies of the Himalaya and Tibet suggest that a major shift from extrusion-dominated to crustal thickening-dominated tectonics occurred in latest Oligocene-early Miocene time, approximately coincident with the start of unroofing in the Tian Shan. This suggests that Tian Shan unroofing was a distant effect of that shift within the collision zone.

TANG W, ZHANG Z, LI J , et al.

Late Paleozoic to Jurassic tectonic evolution of the Bogda area (northwest China): Evidence from detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology

Tectonophysics, 2014,626(1):144-156.

DOI:10.1016/j.tecto.2014.04.005      URL     [Cited within: 1]

61Provenances in the Bogda area changed noticeably from the Permian to the Jurassic.61Evolution of basin pattern is consistent with geological setting of this area.61The Bogda area had a very gentle positive relief in the Early Jurassic.61The Bogda Mountains became a major provenance during the Middle-Late Jurassic.

FANG Shihu, GUO Zhaojie, SONG Yan , et al.

Sedimentary facies evolution and basin pattern of the Jurassic in southern margin area of Junggar Basin

Journal of Palaeogeography, 2005,7(3):347-356.

URL     [Cited within: 1]

The middle and lower Jurassic in southern margin area of Junggar basin was divided into 5 sequences based on analyses of exploration lines,well,logging curve,paleontology,field outcrop profiles and seismic reflective.Lowstand,lacustrine transgressive and highstand systems tracts were subdivided by the stacking patterns of stratigraphy,changes of lithology and lithofacies.The sequence stratigraphic correlation in well-tie sections made it possible to construct the regional stratigraphic framework.Fan delta,delta,lacustrine and peat swamp sedimentary system facies were identified by fully applying the drilling,logging,palaeontology and field outcrop profiles data.The architecture,evolution,distribution of sedimentary faces of the middle and lower Jurassic in southern margin area of Junggar Basin was analyzed.The coal-accumulation features in sequence stratigraphic framework was clarified.Coal bed vertical distribution was controlled by the sequence architecture pattern.Coal bed is developed in the early lowstand systems tract and in the late highstand systems tract,and coal bed transverse distribution is controlled by the sedimentary environment.

/