Biogenic HPZs typically occur as thin, continuous sheets, with relatively small thickness, large horizontal scale, and good connectivity. Injection and production wells are all within the plane of the HPZs. Injected water rapidly progresses along the HPZs, resulting in early water breakthrough for production wells (less than one year). Horizontal water injectors are often used for development. Production wells below the HPZs have a long water-free production period and a relatively slow rise in water cut, yielding the best development results. Wells across the HPZs have the second-best development results. Wells above the HPZs have the worst performance. When thin HPZs are developed within a reservoir, the injection wells are adjacent to the lower medium-permeability reservoir layer, and the production wells are located below the upper HPZs (
Fig. 7a). Due to the low pressure in the upper HPZs, the injected water, once entering the reservoir, primarily migrates vertically near the wellbore to the upper HPZs, and then flows laterally to the production wells, causing watered-out phenomena. Meanwhile, some injected water flows under gravity along the medium-permeability reservoir layer (
Fig. 7b). Among the vertical sublayers, only the high-permeability thin layer has significant watered-out degree, followed by watered-out signs near the injection well, and the other sublayers have low watered-out degree. The injected water presents a similar "I"-shaped watered-out pattern. The overall water flooding sweep efficiency is poor
[29]. For example, the upper part of KH2 Formation in the C Oilfield in Iraq has a thin, continuous HPZ with an average thickness of 0.8 m and an average permeability of 248× 10
-3 μm
2. Some core permeabilities exceed 1 000×10
-3 μm
2. Waterflooding was applied in a horizontal well pattern, where the horizontal injector was positioned directly beneath a horizontal producer. The horizontal wells were 800 m long with well spacing of 100 m and row spacing of 300 m. The lateral section of the production wells was mostly in HPZs. The reservoir had a large ratio of vertical to horizontal permeability. The average vertical distance between the oil and water wells was just 7.2 m. The above factors resulted in an "I”-shaped watered-out pattern and a high watered-out degree in the thin HPZs (
Fig. 7b). After waterflooding, the corresponding production wells experienced rapid water breakthrough, with individual well production quickly dropping to below 144 t/d (
Fig. 7c). The water cut rapidly rose to over 50%. When the degree of reserve recovery reached 25%, the water cut reached 80%, resulting in poor waterflooding efficiency (
Fig. 7d).