Genetic types and distinguished characteristics of dolomite and the origin of dolomite reservoirs
1.
2.
3.
Corresponding authors:
Received: 2017-12-01 Revised: 2018-06-18 Online: 2018-12-15
Fund supported: |
|
To find out the origin of dolomite, the precipitation of primary dolomite, and the formation of pores in dolomite, petrologic and geochemical characteristics of typical samples from Sichuan and Tarim Basin were analyzed based on the previous understandings, and three aspects of results were achieved. (1) A classification of dolomite origins based on petrologic features, forming environment, and time sequence was proposed, which shows clear boundaries of diagenetic and characteristic realms and evolved clues between different types of dolomite. (2) Petrographic and geochemical identification marks for different types of dolomite were presented, revealing that the orderly geochemical variation of different types of dolomite is the response to the change of forming environment of dolomite during continuous time sequence. (3) The contribution of dolomitization to the formation of porosity was re-evaluated, revealing that the porosity in dolomite was mostly attributed to the primary pores and supergene dissolution and burial dissolution, and early dolomitization was conducive to the preservation of primary pores. These understandings are of great theoretical significance for identifying the origins and types of dolomite, and can guide the prediction of dolomite reservoirs.
Keywords:
Cite this article
ZHAO Wenzhi, SHEN Anjiang, QIAO Zhanfeng, PAN Liyin, HU Anping, ZHANG Jie.
Introduction
Dolomite reservoirs are important reservoirs for oil and gas. According to the statistics[1], among 226 large and medium oil and gas fields of carbonate rock all over the world that contain 90 percent of the total hydrocarbon reserves of carbonate rock, 102 oil and gas fields and half of the reserves are distributed in dolomite reservoirs. In the Sichuan Basin, over 90 percent of natural gas reserves are enriched in the Sinian, Cambrian, Carboniferous, Permian and Triassic dolomite reservoirs. The major reservoir in the Jingbian gas field of Ordos Basin is dolomite reservoir of Ordovician Majiagou Formation. The Tarim Basin has rich dolomite reservoirs in the Cambrian and Middle-Lower Ordovician strata, where oil and gas reservoirs Yingmai-32 represented by Well Yingmai-32 and Shan-1 have been discovered. Because of the great importance of dolomite reservoir in oil and gas exploration, the origin of dolomite, precipitation of primary dolomite, and the formation of pores in dolomite have been hot topics in geological research[2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9].
(1) Origin of dolomite. Numerous dolomitization models were proposed previously, including eight mainstream dolomitization models, seepage-reflux dolomitization[10], capillary concentration dolomitization[11], sabkha dolomitization[12], mixing-water dolomitization[13], adjustment-compact dolomitization[3, 14], burial-compact dolomitization[15], seawater thermal convection dolomitization[16], and structure-controlled hydrothermal dolomitization[17]. The dolomitization occurs in pene-contemporaneous or burial stages, no matter how many dolomitization models there are. The existing genetic models only explain the origin of one or some types of dolomite, however, due to the lack of continuity and systematicity, the genetic model-based classification of dolomite hasn’t been establish so far.
(2) Precipitation of primary dolomite during (pene-)contemporaneous stage. The results of lab experiment show that single inorganic precipitation reaction as long as 32 years is unable to generate dolomite under surface temperature and pressure (≤ 50 °C, pressure at depth of meters)[18]. In Abu Dhabi Sabkha, Coorong Lagoons, Lagoa Vermelha and other modern salty coasts, spherical protodolomite can be precipitated through the action of sulfate reducing bacteria[19,20,21,22,23], halophilic bacteria[24,25,26] and methane-producing bacteria[26,27,28] at 35-40 °C. Warthmann et al. succeeded in gaining primary dolomite by precipitation in the laboratory[21], found that the primary dolomite they cultured has similar spherical shape and low ordering degree to that produced in Lagoa Vermelha salty coast, and thus pointed out specific types of microbes (such as sulfate reducing bacteria, halophilic bacteria, methane-producing bacteria, etc.), certain salinity (35‰- 100‰) and alkalinity, certain temperature (30-45 °C), low concentration of sulfate radical ion, and high concentration of carbonate and magnesium ions are conditions for precipitation of primary dolomite. Extracellular polymers (EPS) generated from the microbial activity are one of the main contributors to dolomite precipitation[23].
(3) Origin of pores in dolomite. The role of dolomitization in porosity construction and destruction has been a debatable issue for a long time[29,30,31]. As the reservoir space is mainly developed in various types of dolomite, and even the reservoir space of reef shoal facies is mainly developed in dolomitized deposits. The mainstream view is that pores in the dolomite reservoir are the product of dolomitization. Based on principle of mass conservation, Weyl[32] proposed that if dolomitization was a process of replacement between molecules, and source of CO32- was very limited, when calcite was transformed to denser dolomite, the porosity could increase 13% theoretically. However, Lucia and Major[33] pointed out that the theory was not applicable to formation mechanism of all pores in carbonate rocks, and porosity of dolomite was always equal to or less than that of its original rock, suggesting the characteristics of original rock might be a key factor for porosity variation in the process of dolomitization. Purser et al. held a middle view that although the characteristics of original rock (limestone) have an important effect on dolomite porosity, the source of CO32- and restricted diagenetic environment are of equal importance, only in such diagenetic environment, can dolomitization lead to an increase of porosity[34]. The porosity loss associated with dolomitization, especially precipitation of saddle dolomite blocking pores, is commonly seen in burial diagenetic environment[30, 35]. In conclusion, no consensus on the contribution of dolomitization to formation of the porosity in dolomite has reached.
Based on reviewing previous research results, outcrop, core, thin section, and cathodoluminescence observations and other petrographic analysis were performed on samples taken from the key dolomite layers in the Sichuan, Tarim and Ordos Basins, and more than 600 geochemical tests including the ordering degree, carbon and oxygen isotopes composition, Sr isotopes ratio, trace elements, rare earth elements (REE), fluid inclusions, isotope geothermometry (D47), and isotopic dating were conducted. The genetic classification for dolomites based on forming environment variation and time sequence is proposed, petrographic and geochemical identification marks for different genetic types of dolomite are established, and the contribution of dolomitization to the formation of porosity is re-evaluated. These new understandings are of great theoretical significance, and realistic significance to the prediction of dolomite reservoir distribution.
1. Genetic types of the dolomite
Although there are many classifications for carbonate rocks[36, 37], they are predominately based on the rock texture, and a genetic classification widely agreed is absent. For example, the classification proposed by Folk is mainly based on the grain size, roundness, sorting, stacking pattern and grain components[35]. The one proposed by Dunham[37] mainly based on the occurrence of identifiable primary structural components. He named carbonate rocks with identifiable primary structural components the micrite, wackestone, packstone, grainstone and bondstone, and named those with unidentifiable ones crystalline limestone, and left the classification of dolomite uncovered. According to Shen Anjiang[38], there are two main types of dolomite with identifiable and unidentifiable structural components of primary rock, respectively (Table 1). For dolomite with identifiable primary structural components, the classification of limestone is applicable by just changing the limestone in the limestone structure classification table into dolomite. Such dolomite is often considered as the product of pene-contemporaneous or contemporaneous precipitation or replacement. While the dolomite with unidentifiable primary structural components, such as fine, medium crystalline dolomites, are often considered as the product of secondary replacement or recrystallization, and named the very fine, fine, medium, coarse and macro crystalline dolomite, respectively, according to grain size, which correspond to the crystalline limestone classified by Dunham. The dolomite classification schemes described above are only descriptive ones based on the structure and grain size, not a genetic one. Warren summarized and discussed ten dolomitization models[5], and analyzed the development mechanisms and background of different dolomitizations, but failed to establish a systematical and mature genetic classification.
Table 1 Classification of dolomite corresponding to the classification of limestone established by Dunham[36, 38].
Limestone classification established by Dunham | Identifiable primary texture | Crystal grain texture with unidentifiable sedimentary structures (grain size/mm) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Original structural components have not been bonded together during deposition | Original structural components are bonded during deposition | |||||
Lime mud-bearing (clay or silt-sized carbonate rock) | Lime mud-lacking, grain-supported | |||||
Lime mud-supported | Grain- supported | |||||
Grain content < 10% | Grain content > 10% | |||||
Micrite limestone | Wackestone | Packstone | Grain dolomite | Bondstone | Crystalline limestone | |
Classification of dolomite corresponding to that proposed by Dunham | Micritic dolomite | Wackestone | Packstone | Grain dolomite | Reef dolomite Algal mound dolomite | Very finely crystal dolomite (0.03-0.10) |
Fine crystalline dolomite (0.10-0.25) | ||||||
Medium crystalline dolomite (0.25-0.50) | ||||||
Coarse crystalline dolomite (0.50-2.00) | ||||||
Macro crystalline dolomite ( > 2.00) |
Based on petrographic features, forming environment and time sequence, the authors classified dolomite into three types and six sub-types in this work (Table 2). This classification proposes that the type of dolomite is a function of time sequence and forming environment evolution. As time progresses (from early to late, from contemporaneous stage to burial stage) and diagenetic environment evolves (from wet to dry, from low temperature-pressure to high temperature-pressure, from fresh water, seawater to burial, hydrothermal diagenetic medium), different types of dolomite appear in sequence, showing clear boundaries in diagenetic and characteristic realms and clear evolving clues between different types of dolomite. This classification has more systematicity and better continuity. By contrast, the existing dolomitization models only explain the origin of one or some types of dolomite in the classification.
Table 2 Types, time sequences, environments, identification marks of dolomite.
Note: Geochemical data in the table is measured data of the relevant samples. Isotopic dating data is from the isotope laboratory at the university of Queensland, the isotope temperature measuring data is from Isotope Lab of California University, and the rest data is from the key laboratory of carbonate reservoir, CNPC.
In terms of formation stage, dolomite is generally formed in (pene-)contemporaneous and burial stages.
The development of low-temperature dolomite during (pene-)contemporaneous stage is closely related to the evolution of paleoclimate and paleoenvironment. As the paleoclimate varies from wet to dry, with gradual increase of temperature, salinity and alkalinity, seawater (island) dolomite, microbial dolomite, evaporated (Sabkha or seepage reflux) dolomite develop in sequence, finally to layered gypsum - salt deposits. Associated gypsum-salt nodules or fillings are rarely seen in microbial dolomite, but common in evaporated dolomite. This is because the most suitable temperature, salinity, alkalinity for microbes living are 30-45 °C, 35‰-100‰, and over 8.5[21], respectively, microbes are hard to survive when they get higher, and microbial dolomite is replaced by evaporated dolomite, and when salinity exceeds 350‰ and PH exceeds 10, evaporated dolomite is replaced by gypsum-salt layers. The seawater (island) dolomite in this work should be defined as the early low-temperature dolomite formed in wet climate. Since a large number of examples of this kind are from the island environment of modern oceans, the dolomite is named seawater (island) dolomite, but its formation is not limited to the island environment, and considered associated with the seawater dolomitization induced by geothermal convection or topography driven flows[4,5]. The low-temperature dolomite has two kinds of origins, precipitation (protodolomite) and replacement. The microbial dolomite is the protodolomite originated from precipitation, while the seawater (island) dolomite and evaporated dolomite are generated from replacement, which are dominated by algal dolomite, micritic - very fine cystal dolomite and reef (mound) bank dolomite composed of micrites and very fine crystals, with primary texture remained. In a complete early low-temperature sequence, the seawater (island) dolomite, microbial dolomite, evaporated dolomite, gypsum-salt layers should appear orderly as climate varies from wet to dry. However, due to incomplete evolution of paleoclimate and paleoenvironment, the three types of dolomite and gypsum-salt layer don’t necessarily appear in succession in geologic records. The Leikoupo Formation in Sichuan Basin develop multiple cycles of microbial dolomite, evaporated dolomite and gypsum - salt layer from the bottom up, without early seawater (island) dolomite representing humid climate. While in the Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin, only microbial dolomite occurs, with absence of seawater (island) dolomite representing humid climate and evaporated dolomite and gypsum-salt layers representing extreme drought climate. Multiple cycles composed of evaporated dolomite and gypsum-salt layers are found in the Majiagou Formation in Ordos Basin, with a small amount of microbial dolomite, reflecting intermittent desalination under extreme drought climate. While in the Rock Island of Xisha Islands, South China Sea, the seawater (island) dolomite only exists in the Mio-Pliocene strata, indicating the paleoclimate didn't reach drought stage (Fig. 1).
Developmental sequence of dolomite during penecontemporaneous stage.
Developmental sequence of dolomite during penecontemporaneous stage.
Fig. 1.
The burial dolomite with residual grain texture and crystal grain texture can be evolved from the early low-temperature dolomite or limestone by replacement, recrystallization and overgrowth, where residual grains are composed of crystalline dolomite. With the increase of burial dolomitization degree (increasing burial depth, rising temperature and prolonging time of dolomitization), the crystal size of dolomite increases gradually. When it is larger than the primary grain size, the primary grain texture is difficult to maintain, in contrast, when the crystal size is smaller than the primary grain, the primary grain texture is likely to be kept. This is the fundamental reason that some crystalline dolomites have residual primary grain texture, but some don't (fine, medium, coarse, macro dolomite). Obviously, the finer the primary grains, and the stronger the burial dolomitization the primary rock experiences, the more unlikely the primary grain texture would be kept. This also explains the reason why the residual grain texture is common in fine - medium crystalline dolomite.
Structurally controlled-hydrothermal dolomite is formed by tectonic and thermal fluid activities during burial stage. It could deviate from the normal burial evolution sequence in time and burial depth, and is related to tectonic activities. It often comes in two occurrences: the dolomite developing along the deep fluid pathway such as fracture systems and unconformities, in lenticular, porphyritic and fence distribution, which is dominated by medium-coarse crystalline dolomite originated from limestone or dolomite through replacement or recrystallization; coarse-macro crystalline dolomite distributed along fracture systems, unconformities, dissolved pores, dominated by precipitated saddle dolomite, with limestone or dolomite as host rock. It generally appears in association with hydrothermal minerals such as quartz, fluorite, sulfides (pyrite, galena, sphalerite).
In conclusion, the classification described above should represent a genetic classification, which reveals that as time goes on and diagenetic environment changes, different types of dolomite are formed in succession, making the evolving clues between different types of dolomite clear. All types of dolomite in nature can be found a corresponding position in the above-mentioned time sequence and forming environment, that is, they can be found in the classification in Table 2.
Table 3 Cenozoic seawater (island) dolomite widely distributed all over the world.
No. | Island name | Area | No. | Island name | Area |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bahamas | Bahamas Islands | 12 | Funafuti Atoll | Funafuti Island |
2 | Andros Island | Andros Island | 13 | Mururoa Atoll | Mid-Pasific Islands |
3 | Sugarloaf Key | Gulf of Mexico | 14 | Niue Island | Niue Island (New Zealand) |
4 | Ambergris Cay, Belize | Belize City | 15 | Rangiora Atoll | Rangiora (New Zealand) |
5 | San Andres Island | Colombia | 16 | Aitutaki | Cook Islands |
6 | West Caicos Island | West Indies | 17 | Fuerte- ventura | Canary Islands |
7 | Barbados | Barbados Island | 18 | Enewetak Atoll | Pacific Ocean |
8 | Florida Bay Mud Islands | Florida | 19 | Midway Atoll | Midway Islands |
9 | Cayman Island | Caribbean | 20 | Jamaica | Jamaica |
10 | Bonaire | Bonaire Island | 21 | Makatea | Polynesian |
11 | Curacao | Antilles | 22 | Okinawa | Ryukyu |
2. Identification and origin of dolomite
The classification of dolomite in Table 2 shows clear boundaries in the petrographic features, environments and time sequence between different types of dolomite, which laid a solid foundation for identification of dolomites of different origins based on petrological, geochemical features. This paper discussed petrographic and geochemistry identification markers of the three types and six subtypes of dolomite listed in Table 2, and analyze the petrological and geochemical differences of different genetic types of dolomite using many cases.
2.1. Identification markers and origin of early low-temperature dolomite
2.1.1. Seawater (island) dolomite
According to the elucidation above, the seawater (island) dolomite should be defined as the early low-temperature dolomite formed under humid climate. Since a large number of cases are from the island environment of modern ocean, the dolomite is called seawater (island) dolomite, but it is not formed in island environment only. The origin of such dolomite was explained as the mixed water dolomitization[13] and seawater thermal convection dolomitization[16] previously.
Such dolomite is young, Neogene to Modern in age, and the dolomitization occurred in penecontemporaneous stage and in a relatively simple diagenetic environment surrounded by seawater (isolated platform). The dolomite or its associated rocks are new, and have not experienced late burial diagenetic transformation, with the dolomitization temperature close to the surface temperature. With an example of the Miocene- Pliocene strata on Shidao Island of Xisha Islands, South China Sea, the petrographic and geochemical features of such dolomite are illustrated[39]. The dolomites with similar features and origins are also found in the Miocene-Pliocene strata in Bahamas Bank[16], Pacific Enewetak Atoll[40] and Caribbean Cayman Islands[41].
On Shidao Island, in Well Xike 1, there are sedimentary hiatus surfaces (exposure surfaces) and associated bioclastic dolomite and algal dolomite (Fig. 2a, 2b), which are 150 m and 10 m thick respectively, at the top of the Miocene Xuande Formation and Pliocene Yongle Formation. The dolomite has well preserved primary texture, and primary sedimentary pores and early supergene enlarged pores largely. X-ray diffraction analysis shows this kind of dolomite is pure and low in order degree (around 0.4). It has positive δ13C and δ18O of (1‰-3‰ PDB) which are not correlated, this is completely different from mixed water dolomite. The variation trend of its δ13C is the same as that of the global water at the same stage. Its Sr isotope ratio is in the range of and has the same variation trend with that of the same stage seawater. It has low contents of Mn (less than 40×10-6) and Fe (less than 200× 10-6), and higher Sr content of ((150-250)×10-6). There is no correlation between its Sr content and Fe content, and between Sr content and Mn content. Its rare earth element distribution pattern is similar to that of modern seawater. The geothermometer of oxygen isotope (D47) reveals the dolomite is formed between 20-35 °C. The isotopic absolute age of the dolomite cement is 5±0.2 Ma. All these prove that the dolomitization happened soon after the deposition, and in the diagenetic environment not completely away from seawater.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Petrological features of three types of early low-temperature dolomite. (a) Intergranular pores, bioclastic dolomite, Miocene Xuande Formation, Well Xike 1, Shidao Island of Xisha Islands; (b) Intergranular pores and bioclastic moldic pores, partially filled by dolomite cements, bioclastic dolomite, Miocene Xuande Formation, Well Xike 1, Shidao Island of Xisha Islands; (c) Microbial mat (Desulfovibrio brasiliensis) on the surface of the lower part of intertidal zone, Sabkha Coast, Abu Dhabi (according to reference [22]); (d) Algal framework pores, algal lamina or algal laminated dolomite, dolosparite cement, 5 067.35 m, Forth Member of Dengying Formation, Well Moxi 17, Sichuan Basin; (e) Spherical dolomite in algal lamina and algal laminated dolomite, 5 108.07 m, Forth Member of Dengying Formation, Well Moxi 8, Sichuan Basin; (f) Honeycomb or rice-granular gypsum-moldic pores, yellowish gray gypsiferous mud-sized crystalline dolomite, Middle-Lower Cambrian, Well YaHa 10, Tarim Basin; (g) Intergranular dolomite cement and residual intergranular pores, dolograinstone, 5 833.00 m, Middle Cambrian, Well YaHa 7 X - 1, Tarim Basin; (h) Tubular gypsum moldic pore, filled by a small amount of quartz, micritic-fine crystal dolomite, Majiagou Formation, 3 629.00 m, Well Shan 30, Ordos Basin; (I) Algal framework pores and intergranular pores, dolomite cement, algal framework dolomite, Leikoupo Formation, 3134.02 m, Well Zhongba 80, Sichuan Basin.
2.1.2. Microbial dolomite
As mentioned above, the microbial dolomite refers to the primary dolomite formed by precipitation of low-temperature dolomite related to microbial activities. The specific types of microbes (sulfate-reducing bacteria, methane-producing archaea, cyanobacteria, etc.), certain salinity (35‰-100‰) and alkalinity (pH value more than 8.5), certain temperature range (30-45 °C), low concentration of sulfate ion, high concentrations of carbonate ion and magnesium ion are necessary conditions for development of low-temperature dolomite in nature. The extracellular polymers (EPS) produced by microbial activities is one of the main contributors to precipitation of dolomite[23], which is facilitated by carboxyl functional groups on the cell surface of the halophilic archaea in high salinity environment[42]. Naturally precipitated dolomite and that produced by lab culture experiments have similar sphere, ellipsoid and dumbbell shapes, which are the important identification marks of microbial dolomite[23]. The modern microbial dolomite is widely distributed in Sabkha high salinity areas such as Abu Dhabi, Coron Lagoon and Lagoa Vermelha, etc. Microbial dolomites spread extensively in the Sinian Dengying Formation and Triassic Leikoupo Formation in Sichuan Basin, the Sinian Qiaganbulake Formation and Cambrian Xiaoerbulake Formation in Tarim Basin, and the Jixianian Wumishan Formation in North China as important oil and gas reservoirs[43]. With an example of the primary dolomite precipitated in microbial mats on the Sabkha coast and microbial dolomite in the Fourth Member of Dengying Formation in the Sichuan Basin, petrological and geochemical features of such dolomite are elaborated.
In microbial mats on the modern coast of Abu Dhabi (99.60% microbes are Desulfovibrio brasiliensis), the precipitated primary dolomite oxygen isotope composition value is positive to low negative (-3‰-7‰ PDB), while the precipitated primary carbon isotope value is low positive (0-2‰ PDB)[22]. This type of dolomite often features laminar algal, stromatolite algal, framework algal, algal arenite, clot algae dolomites (Fig. 2c). It has sphere shape and extracellular polymer (EPS), and well-preserved primary texture, and its porosity is mainly composed of sedimentary primary pores and dissolution enlarged pores due to exposure, showing features of early stage low temperature precipitation dolomite related to evaporated environment and microbial activities[23]. The microbial dolomite in the Fourth Member of Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin has a degree of order of 0.4-0.5, negative oxygen isotope composition value (-8‰ - 4‰ PDB), low positive carbon isotope ratio (0-2‰ PDB), Sr isotope ratio value equivalent with the reference value of seawater in the same period[44], abundance of Fe, low content of Sr and Mn, dark orange light of cathodoluminescence, forming temperature of 30-35 °C revealed by oxygen isotope geothermometer (D47), absolute age from isotopic dating of 542-555 Ma, which is consistent with the corresponding formation age. These features are similar to features of modern microbial dolomite on Abu Dhabi Coast (Fig. 2d, 2e), but with more negative oxygen isotopic composition value, which is related to the burial diagenetic alternation.
2.1.3. Evaporated dolomite
Early low-temperature dolomite includes primary dolomite associated with microbial activities, and evaporated dolomite derived from diagenetic replacement. Previously, researchers explained the origin of this kind of dolomite with seepage reflux dolomitization[10], capillary enrichment dolomitization[11] and evaporating pump dolomitization[12]. The evaporated dolomite, which has nothing to do with microbial activities (high salinity leads to death of microbes), is formed in a higher salinity (100‰-350‰) and alkalinity (pH value more than 9) environment than the microbial dolomite under arid climate. Thus, it is often associated with gypsum nodules or precipitation of cements, and distributed between microbial dolomite and gypsum-salt rock vertically. The dolomite related to evaporative environment is developed extensively in various stages (Table 4). With an example of the Lower Cambrian dolomite in the Tarim Basin (Fig. 2f, 2g), its petrographic and geochemical features are elaborated. This kind of dolomite also exists in the Majiagou Formation of Ordos Basin (Fig. 2h) and the Leikoupo Formation of Sichuan Basin (Fig. 2i), and acts as important oil and gas reservoir.
Table 4 Modern and geological historical time evaporated dolomites all over the world.
No. | Modern | No. | Ancient | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tidal flat, Abu Dhabi | Sabkha, Marginal sea | 10 | Ordovician Red River Formation, Williiston Basin, United States | Sabkha, Marginal sea |
2 | South Florida | Sabkha, Marginal sea | 11 | Carboniferous Mission Canyon Formation, Williiston Basin, United States | Sabkha, Marginal sea |
3 | Anddros Island, Bahamas | Sabkha, Marginal sea | 12 | Ordovician Ellenburger Formation, West Texas, United States | Sabkha, Marginal sea |
4 | Xin Barag Zuoqi, Inner Mongolia | Sabkha, Lake basin | 13 | Permian Guadalupian Formation, Texas, United States | Evaporated lagoon, Marginal sea |
5 | Nuoer, Jibuhulangtu, Inner Mongolia | Sabkha, Lake basin | 14 | Permian, South Cowden Oil Field, West Texas, United States | Evaporated lagoon, Marginal sea |
6 | Brejo do Espinho, Brazil | Sabkha, Marginal sea | 15 | Jurassic Smackover Formation, East Texas, United States | Evaporated lagoon, Marginal sea |
7 | Peru Margin, Pacific | Evaporated lagoon, Marginal sea | 16 | Cambrian pre-salt dolomite, Tarim Basin | Sabkha, Marginal sea and evaporated lagoon |
8 | Coorong Lagoons, Australia | Evaporated lagoon, Marginal sea | 17 | Triassic Jialingjiang Formation and Leikoupo Formation, Sichuan Basin | Sabkha, Marginal sea and evaporated lagoon |
9 | Lagoa Vermelha, South America | Evaporated lagoon, Marginal sea | 18 | Ordovician Majiagou Formation, Ordos Basin | Sabkha, Marginal sea and evaporated lagoon |
The evaporated dolomite in the Lower Cambrian strata, Tarim Basin is dominated by gypsum nodule-bearing micritic dolomite and grain dolomite. Covered by gypsum-salt layers, it has well-preserved primary texture, and its porosity is mainly contributed by gypsum-moldic pores, grain moldic pores, and residual intergranular pores (Fig. 2f, 2g). The dolomite has an order degree of 0.6-0.7, low positive - low negative carbon isotopic value (-2‰-2‰ PDB) and low negative oxygen isotopic value (-8‰--4‰ PDB). It has higher Sr isotope value and similar REE distribution pattern with those of seawater in the same period, generally low content of Fe and Mn, nonluminescence or dark orange cathode luminescence, forming temperature of 35-60 °C revealed by oxygen isotope geothermometer (D47), and forming time equivalent with or slightly later than the corresponding formation.
Geochemical features and change trends of the three types of low-temperature dolomite during (pene-)contemporaneous stage are shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Geochemical characteristics and their variation trend of (pene-)contemporaneous low-temperature dolomite from (island) seawater dolomite, microbial dolomite to evaporated dolomite. (a) Order degree of dolomite is generally low, but shows an increasing trend; (b) Carbon and oxygen isotopic values shift from low positive to low negative gradually; (c) Sr isotope ratio turns from equivalent to that of contemporary seawater to higher than that of contemporary seawater gradually; (d) Values of the rare-earth elements turns from equivalent to higher than the reference value of contemporary seawater; (e) The ancient temperature measured by oxygen isotope (D47) turns from normal to higher gradually; (f) The isotopic age is equivalent to or younger than the formation age.
2.2. Identification and origin of crystalline dolomite during burial stage
Dolomitization during burial stage generates two types of dolomite, crystalline texture dolomite and dolomite with primary texture. The dolomite with crystalline texture is dominated by fine and medium crystalline dolomites, and a small amount of coarse crystalline dolomite. Coarse and marco crystalline dolomites are primarily observed in the structurally controlled - hydrothermal dolomite, with intercrystalline pores and intercrystalline dissolved pores developed. The dolomite with primary texture is dominated by grain dolomite, in which grains consist of fine, medium crystalline dolomites.
2.2.1. Crystalline dolomite with primary grain texture
Such dolomite could be originated from either grain limestone or evaporated dolomite, and mainly appears in coarse grain limestone or evaporated dolomite, with grains of fine, medium crystalline dolomites, which are resulted from replacement, recrystallization and secondary overgrowth similarly with the dolomite with crystal grain texture. The preservation of primary grain texture is due to the large primary grain than dolomite grain. Depending on the preservation degree of primary grain texture, a series of transitional types are classified between the dolomite with crystal grain texture and crystalline dolomite with primary grain texture, thus, they are often associated or mixed with each other. With an example of the Feixianguan Formation oolitic dolomite, petrographic and geochemical features of such dolomite are illustrated.
The ooids constituting the oolitic dolomite are composed of fine and medium euhedral and semi-euhedral crystalline dolomites, with intergranular pores and oomold pores, and rare calcite and dolomite cements (Fig. 4a, 4b, 4c). The dolomite has a degree of order from 0.5 to 0.8, which increases with crystal size and euhedral degree; low positive carbon isotopic value (0.5‰ - 3‰ PDB), low negative-high negative oxygen isotopic value (-8‰ --4‰ PDB), which tends to be high negative with the increase of crystal size and euhedral degree. Its Sr isotope ratio is close to that of seawater during the same period. Its REE pattern with higher content of light elements than heavy elements reflects its burial origin[45]. It has high contents of Fe and Mn, ranging from 629.2×10-6 to 1 194.0×10-6 and from 58.7×10-6 to 83.8×10-6, respectively, strong orange cathodoluminescence. The inclusion homogenization temperature (80-150 °C) highly consistent with that revealed by oxygen isotope geothermometer (D47) indicates the dolomite is formed in deep burial environment, and is considered as a result of multi-stage replacement or recrystallization. The isotopic dating reveals the absolute ages of dolomites formed in different stages are younger than the corresponding formation ages.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Petrological characteristics of the three types of burial, hydrothermal dolomites in late stage. (a) Intergranular pores, residual oolitic texture, very fine - fine crystalline dolomite, Feixianguan Formation, 5 626.00 m, Well Longgang 2, Sichuan Basin; (b) Residual intergranular pores, pebble texture, fine crystalline dolomite, Feixianguan Formation, 3 243.97 m, Well Luojia 2, Sichuan Basin; (c) Intergranular (dissolved) pores and organism pores, residual grain texture, fine crystalline dolomite, Changxing Formation, 5 976.00 m, Well Longgang 28, Sichuan Basin; (d) Pinhole-like intercrystalline pores, saccharoidal fine - medium crystalline dolomite, Qixia Formation, 2 423.00 m, core from Well Kuang 2, Sichuan Basin; (e) Intergranular (dissolved) pores, fine crystalline dolomite, 2 423.55 m, Qixia Formation, Sichuan Basin, Well Kuang 2, Sichuan Basin; (f) Organism pores and dissolved pores, bioclastic stone is the primary rock, same visual area with e; (g) Intergranular (dissolved) pores, medium - coarse crystalline dolomite, Qixia Formation, 7 328.60 m, Well Shuangtan 8, Sichuan Basin; (h) Some solution pores in dolomite filled by saddle dolomite, Qixia Formation, Chejiaba Section, Guangyuan, Sichuan Basin; (I) Some fractures filled by saddle dolomite, Maokou Formation, outcrop section, Sichuan Basin.
2.2.2. Dolomite with crystalline texture
As mentioned above, the dolomite with crystal grain texture is dominated by fine and medium crystalline dolomites. Its primary rock is grain limestone[38]. When the crystal grain is smaller, the primary grain texture can be remained, but when the crystal grain is larger than the primary grain size, the primary grain texture is hard to be kept. As the buried depth increases and dolomitization goes on, the grain size of dolomite crystal increases gradually. Previously, researchers explained the origin of this type of dolomite with burial-compaction dolomitization[15] and adjustment-compaction dolomitization[3, 14]. This kind of dolomite is distributed widely in the Upper Cambrian, Ordovician Penglaiba Formation, the lower member of Yingshan Formation in the Tarim Basin, the middle Fourth and Fifth Members of Majiagou Formation in the Ordos Basin, and Longwangmiao Formation, Qixia Formation, Changxing Formation and Feixianguan Formation in the Sichuan Basin, and often associates with dolomite with primary grain texture.
With an example of the Qixia Formation in the Sichuan Basin, petrographic and geochemical features of such dolomite are described. Compared with the dolomite with primary grain texture, it has rare primary grain texture, and is dominated by larger xenomorphic-subhedral dolomites (Fig. 4d, 4e, 4f) in mosaic-like contact. It mainly contains intercrystalline pores and intercrystalline dissolved pores, and dolomite cements commonly. It has similar geochemical characteristics and change trend with dolomite with primary grain texture, which is characterized by a wide data change range, indicating it is the product of multiple-stage replacement and recrystallization.
2.3. Identification and origin of structurally
controlled - hydrothermal dolomite
In the Qixia Formation and Maokou Formation, Sichuan Basin, with the action of replacement and deposition, structurally controlled - hydrothermal dolomite appears in two kinds of occurrence. One is the quasi-layered, lenticular or patchy dolomite distributed along the fracture system, unconformity surface and other deep fluid channels, which experienced destructive effect and constructive effect to porosity, contains pores largely inherited from primary pores, and is composed of mainly medium coarse to coarse grain saddle dolomite (Fig. 4g). Deep-source magnesium-rich hydrothermal fluids with temperature 5 °C higher than the surrounding environment migrate upward through the unconformity surface and fracture system, leading to formation of dolomite through dolomitization by replacing the adjacent limestone. Previously, the origin of this dolomite was explained by hydrothermal dolomitization[17].
The other is the saddle dolomite developing along the fracture system, unconformity surface, dissolved vugs and pores by precipitation[17, 46]. It is composed of coarse to macro crystalline dolomite, and the host rock is limestone or dolomite (Fig. 4h, 4i). It generally comes in the form of cement filling vugs and pores, which mainly destroy porosity, forming residual pores, vugs and fractures. It could appear alone or in association with hydrothermal minerals such as quartz, fluorite, sulfides (pyrite, galena, sphalerite).
The structurally controlled - hydrothermal dolomite is characterized by large crystal size, curved crystal face, sweep extinction, and relatively low degree of order (0.6-0.8). The fluid inclusion homogenization temperature and isotope (D47) temperature (190-220 °C) are apparently higher than the formation temperature when the dolomite was formed. The fluid is abundant in volatile gas and 18O, high in salinity (12%-25%), and severely depleted in oxygen stable isotopes (-25‰ - -10‰ PDB). The dolomite has strong cathodoluminescences or alternation with nonluminescence, which is related to the change in Fe and Mn contents. Its Sr isotope ratio (87Sr/86Sr) is much higher than that of host formation of saddle dolomite, and the isotopic dating reveals its absolute age is younger than the formation.
Geochemical features and change trends of the three types of high-temperature crystalline dolomites in burial stage are shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Geochemical characteristics and change trends of 3 types of crystal grain dolomites during burial stage with burial depth and temperature. (a) The order degree of the dolomite is relatively high in general, and has a gradual increase trend, and the saddle dolomite has a low degree of order; (b) Oxygen isotopic value shifts from low negative to high negative gradually, carbon isotopes content can either increase or decrease; (c) The Sr isotope ratio can be close to or higher than seawater in the same period, the Sr isotope ratio (87Sr/86Sr) of saddle dolomite is much higher than its host rock; (d) The content of light REEs is greater than that of heavy REEs; (e) The inclusion homogenization temperature is relatively high; (f) The oxygen isotope temperatures (D47) and inclusion homogenization temperature of saddle dolomite are in good consistency, and much higher than the surrounding rock temperature; (g) The absolute age of dolomite is younger than the formation age.
It should be pointed out that some geochemical indexes mentioned above may have deviation since the dolomite would experience various intensity of late digenetic transformation after forming, therefore, the analysis of geochemical data based on specific diagenetic evolution is essential in practical application. Regardless of this, the change trend of geochemical indicators between dolomites formed in time sequence can be preserved.
3. Reservoir formation by dolomite
As mentioned above, the origin of pores in dolomite reservoir has been a hot topic in geological research for a long time. According to the relationship between development degree and types of pores and dolomitization in a large number of cases, it is concluded that the direct contribution of dolomitization to porosity has been exaggerated. The pores in large-scale dolomite reservoirs are mainly the inheritance of primary pores and resulted from supergene dissolution, partly derived from burial dissolution. The early dolomitization is conducive to preservation of pores, but doesn’t generate pores directly.
3.1. Evaluation of dolomitization contribution to porosity construction
Based on the theoretical calculation results, dolomitization in the closed environment would lead to volume reduction. Most researchers considered the porosity in dolomite reservoir the product of dolomitization[32, 47-49]. Huang Sijing et al. conducted geochemical analysis of crystalline dolomite reservoir in the Feixianguan Formation, Northeast Sichuan, and proposed that burial dolomitization in the closed system played an important role in reservoirs forming[50]. Meanwhile, research shows that dolomitization also may destroy porosity[29, 33, 51-52]. Therefore, the contribution of dolomitization to reservoir porosity is uncertain in general. The point generally accepted is that dolomitization can destroy, maintain or enhance the porosity development[5] according to the difference in geological conditions and chemical kinetics reaction.
In this work, based on the case studies of dolomite reservoirs in three large basins, the diverse effects of dolomitization on porosity alteration have been reveals in mainly three aspects.
(1) Dolomitization can generate some pores. In partially dolomitized bioclastic limestone of the Changxin Formation in Longgang area, the sponge spicule and tissue have experienced different degrees of dolomitization (Fig. 6a, 6b) are mainly composed of high calcium dolomite, and distributed along the organism structure. Micro fissures and pores increased remarkably after the sponge tissue experienced dolomitization (Fig. 6c). It should be pointed out that, the contribution of dolomitization to porosity construction is very limited although proved by this case. The porosity generated by dolomitization may only provide seepage channels for late diagenetic fluid transformation, and can’t directly give rise to large-scale high-quality reservoirs.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Types and origins of dolomite reservoir space. (a) Electron back-scattering microscopic image shows dolomitized sponge spicule, tissue and spongin, Changxing Formation, Well Longgang 001, Sichuan Basin; (b) Distribution analysis image of Mg with the same view field with (a), dark parts in electron back-scattering microscopic image are dolomite; (c) Local enlarged electron back-scattering microscopic image of view field of (a) shows micro pores (P) micro-pores generated by dolomitization (D) are mainly in dolomite, with few in calcite (L); (d) Oomold pores in fine crystalline dolomite with primary grain texture, Feixianguan Formation, Well Luojia 2, Sichuan Basin; (e) Non-fabric selective pores generated by burial-hydrothermal dissolution, powder to fine crystalline dolomite, Middle to Lower Cambrian, Well Yaha 10, Tarim Basin; (f) Moldic pores of crystal dolomite, fine crystalline dolomite, Longwangmiao Formation, Well Moxi21, Sichuan Basin.
(2) Early dolomitization is favorable for pore preservation. With strong resistance to compaction, dolomite can preserve the porosity formed early. For example, in supergene environment, the dissolving capacity of dolomite is far weaker than easily soluble minerals such as aragonite, high-magnesian calcite and gypsum, thus, the preservation of moldic pores formed by dissolution of the easily soluble minerals benefited from the framework made of the insoluble dolomite (Fig. 2f). In addition, due to the strong resistance to compaction of dolomite, pressolution products are hardly generated (sutures are mainly developed in limestone, rarely in dolomite). The lack of source for burial cementation is one of the important factors contributing to preservation of preexisting pores in the dolomite related to evaporation environment. The brittleness of dolomite is favorable for fracture development, which is also one of reasons why dolomite reservoirs generally have better quality than limestone reservoirs.
(3) Associated dolomite cement and precipitation of saddle dolomite destroy porosity. After calcite is replaced by dolomite, over dolomitization or dolomite cementation would happen if there is a continuous fluids supply. For example, the dolomite cement precipitated in intergranular pores (Fig. 2b, 2i), and the dolomite precipitated by burial dolomitization and hydrothermal dolomitization when reforming parent rocks or surrounding rocks, destruct dissolved vugs and pores by filling.
3.2. Porosity origin of dolomite reservoir
Although the porosity of dolomite reservoir is not primarily resulted from dolomitization, dolomite is able to form high quality reservoir. Pores in dolomite reservoirs mainly come from inheritance of primary pores, secondarily from enlarged pores by dissolution of meteoric fresh water in the early supergene environment and dissolved vugs and pores formed by burial - thermal dissolution in the burial environment.
Dolomites with complete and part of primary grain texture have a large number of intergranular pores, framework pores (Fig. 2d, 2g, 2i), organism pores, moldic pores (Figs. 4c and 6d), and enlarged pores (further dissolution of primary pores) remained. The intergranular pores, framework pores, organism pores are primary pores formed in deposition, and the moldic pores and enlarged pores are related to dissolution of meteoric fresh water in early supergene stage. In burial environment, the burial-hydrothermal dissolution can form non-fabric selective pores (Fig. 6e, 6f), which are an important supplement to dolomite reservoir space. Pores of the three origins constitute the main dolomite reservoir space[53].
4. Conclusions
The classification of dolomite based on petrography, environment and sequences has been proposed. Development of the penecontemporaneous low-temperature dolomite greatly depends on the paleoclimate and paleoenvironment. As the paleoclimate varied from wet to dry, when the temperature, salinity and alkalinity increased, seawater (island) dolomite, microbial dolomite, evaporated dolomite developed in sequence, finally to gypsum salt rock. Penecontemporaneous low-temperature dolomite mainly includes (gypsum) micritic dolomite and reef (mound) beach facies dolomite generated by precipitation (protodolomite) and replacement respectively, with the original texture well preserved. Three types of dolomite in burial stage are mainly the crystalline dolomite with original texture hardly preserved, and even if part grain texture is remained, the grains are composed of crystalline dolomite. Moreover, with increasing burial depth, diagenetic temperature, dolomitization time and varying diagenetic fluids, the dolomite grains turn coarser and more euhedral.
There are clear boundaries in geochemical characteristics and evolving clues between the six different types of dolomite, however, a lot of dolomite isn’t of single genesis, for example, the early low-temperature dolomite could receive transformation by burial dolomitization additionally, and the dolomite with crystal grain texture formed during burial stage could receive transformation by structural-hydrothermal dolomitization, which greatly increase the geochemical complexity of dolomite. It is necessary to conduct analysis on orderly geochemical and petrological variation corresponding to time and diagenetic environment to help make a more comprehensive and reasonable genetic explanation. Further studies on factors leading to geochemistry difference between different genetic types of dolomite are needed.
Since dolomite reservoirs account for a high proportion in hydrocarbon reservoirs, and have better reservoir properties to limestone, dolomitization is considered as an important contributor to porosity construction. This study shows dolomitization can obviously increase the micro- fissures but has little contribution to reservoir space, the micro-fissures in the dolomite can provide pathways for diagenetic fluids, laying a solid foundation for the supergene dissolution, large-scale dolomitization during burial stage and development of burial dissolved pores. The pores in dolomite are mainly inherited from the primary porosity, and some are from supergene dissolution and burial dissolution. Over-dolomitization would destroy porosity by precipitation of dolomite cement and saddle dolomite. Early dolomitization is conducive to the preservation of primary pores, by forming pore framework with high resistance to compaction, reducing source of cements, and generating brittle fractures.
Reference
Distribution patterns of giant carbonate fields in the world
,
The origin of massive dolomite
,DOI:10.5408/0022-1368-33.2.112 URL [Cited within: 1]
Dolomitization: A critical view of some current views
,DOI:10.1306/212F8AD5-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D URL [Cited within: 3]
ABSTRACT The principal models in vogue today for dolomitization are the mixing zone and the sabkha models. Despite the wide acceptance of these models, there has been little critical assessment of their validity. Such an assessment is the objective of the present paper. Mixing-zone models have such weak underpinnings that they should be questioned as viable explanations for massive dolomitization. Contemporaneous dolomite formation in modern sabkhas is well documented, but the important question of whether the mechanism of dolomite formation is replacement or direct precipitation remains to be resolved. A third dolomitization model considered here is that of Baker and Kastner (1981) based on the experimental finding that sulfate ions inhibit or retard dolomitization. This model should be held in abeyance until serious contradictions are resolved. The current emphasis on mixing-zone and sabkha dolomitization has diverted attention from other promising avenues of approach to the dolomite problem. Four of these avenues, each of which deemphasizes the 'special water' approach, are briefly addressed and are as follows: 1) influence of temperature and time; 2) mass transfer processes; 3) burial diagenesis of epigenetic dolomites; 4) fluid-inclusion studies. -from Author
Cenozoic dolomites of carbonate islands: Their attributes and origin
,DOI:10.1016/S0012-8252(96)00051-7 URL [Cited within: 2]
Dolomites found on and below carbonate islands, atolls and oceanic platforms provide useful insights into the origin of dolomite; insights that may not be attainable from the study of more ancient cratonic dolomites. For this reason they have been the subject of study for decades. A critical mass of case studies now exist and some significant conclusions can be drawn from the cumulative data. In most cases the association with an island is casual and not genetic, nevertheless, these dolomite occurrences are referred to herein as island dolomites.
Dolomite: Occurrence, evolution and economically important associations
,DOI:10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00022-2 URL [Cited within: 4]
Dolomite is not a simple mineral; it can form as a primary precipitate, a diagenetic replacement, or as a hydrothermal/metamorphic phase, all that it requires is permeability, a mechanism that facilitates fluid flow, and a sufficient supply of magnesium. Dolomite can form in lakes, on or beneath the shallow seafloor, in zones of brine reflux, and in early to late burial settings. It may form from seawater, from continental waters, from the mixing of basinal brines, the mixing of hypersaline brine with seawater, or the mixing of seawater with meteoric water, or via the cooling of basinal brines. Bacterial metabolism may aid the process of precipitation in settings where sulfate-reducing species flourish and microbial action may control primary precipitation in some hypersaline anoxic lake settings. Dolomite is a metastable mineral, early formed crystals can be replaced by later more stable phases with such replacements repeated a number of times during burial and metamorphism. Each new phase is formed by the partial or complete dissolution of an earlier dolomite. This continual re-equilibration during burial detracts from the ability of trace elements to indicate depositional conditions and resets the oxygen isotope signature of the dolomite at progressively higher temperatures. Because subsurface dolomite evolves via dissolution and reprecipitation, a bed of dolomite can retain or create porosity and permeability to much greater burial depths and into higher temperature realms than a limestone counterpart. Dolomitization also creates new crystals, with new rhomb growth following the dissolution of less stable precursors. Repetition of this process, without complete pore cementation, can generate intercrystalline porosity a number of times in the rock's burial history. Intercrystalline porosity is a highly interconnected style of porosity that gives dolomite reservoirs their good fluid storage capacity and efficient drainage. The fact that many dolomite reservoirs formed via brine reflux means that they sit beneath an evaporite seal in both platform and basinwide evaporite settings. The same association of evaporites (sulfate source) and entrained hydrocarbons means that burial conditions are also suitable for thermochemical sulfate reduction and the precipitation of base metals. This tends to occur at higher temperatures (>60C 80C) and so the resulting dolomites tend to be ferroan and consist of saddle-shaped crystals.
Concepts and models of dolomitization: A critical reappraisal
,DOI:10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.235.01.02 URL [Cited within: 1]
AbstractDespite intensive research over more than 200 years, the origin of dolomite, the mineral and the rock, remains subject to considerable controversy. This is partly because some of the chemical and/or hydrological conditions of dolomite formation are poorly understood, and because petrographic and geochemical data commonly permit more than one genetic interpretation. This paper is a summary and critical appraisal of the state of the art in dolomite research, highlighting its major advances and controversies, especially over the last 20–25 years.The thermodynamic conditions of dolomite formation have been known quite well since the 1970s, and the latest experimental studies essentially confirm earlier results. The kinetics of dolomite formation are still relatively poorly understood, however. The role of sulphate as an inhibitor to dolomite formation has been overrated. Sulphate appears to be an inhibitor only in relatively low-sulphate aqueous solutions, and probably only indirectly. In sulphate-rich solutions it may actually promote dolomite formation.Mass-balance calculations show that large water/rock ratios are required for extensive dolomitization and the formation of massive dolostones. This constraint necessitates advection, which is why all models for the genesis of massive dolostones are essentially hydrological models. The exceptions are environments where carbonate muds or limestones can be dolomitized via diffusion of magnesium from seawater rather than by advection.Replacement of shallow-water limestones, the most common form of dolomitization, results in a series of distinctive textures that form in a sequential manner with progressive degrees of dolomitization, i.e. matrix-selective replacement, overdolomitization, formation of vugs and moulds, emplacement of up to 20 vol% calcium sulphate in the case of seawater dolomitization, formation of two dolomite populations, and — in the case of advanced burial — formation of saddle dolomite. In addition, dolomite dissolution, including karstification, is to be expected in cases of influx of formation waters that are dilute, acidic, or both.Many dolostones, especially at greater depths, have higher porosities than limestones, and this may be the result of several processes, i.e. mole-per-mole replacement, dissolution of unreplaced calcite as part of the dolomitization process, dissolution of dolomite due to acidification of the pore waters, fluid mixing (mischungskorrosion), and thermochemical sulphate reduction. There also are several processes that destroy porosity, most commonly dolomite and calcium sulphate cementation. These processes vary in importance from place to place. For this reason, generalizations about the porosity and permeability development of dolostones are difficult, and these parameters have to be investigated on a case-by-case basis.A wide range of geochemical methods may be used to characterize dolomites and dolostones, and to decipher their origin. The most widely used methods are the analysis and interpretation of stable isotopes (O, C), Sr isotopes, trace elements, and fluid inclusions. Under favourable circumstances some of these parameters can be used to determine the direction of fluid flow during dolomitization.The extent of recrystallization in dolomites and dolostones is much disputed, yet extremely important for geochemical interpretations. Dolomites that originally form very close to the surface and from evaporitic brines tend to recrystallize with time and during burial. Those dolomites that originally form at several hundred to a few thousand metres depth commonly show little or no evidence of recrystallization.Traditionally, dolomitization models in near-surface and shallow diagenetic settings are defined and/or based on water chemistry, but on hydrology in burial diagenetic settings. In this paper, however, the various dolomite models are placed into appropriate diagenetic settings.Penecontemporaneous dolomites form almost syndepositionally as a normal consequence of the geochemical conditions prevailing in the environment of deposition. There are many such settings, and most commonly they form only a few per cent of microcrystalline dolomite(s). Many, if not most, penecontemporaneous dolomites appear to have formed through the mediation of microbes.Virtually all volumetrically large, replacive dolostone bodies are post-depositional and formed during some degree of burial. The viability of the many models for dolomitization in such settings is variable. Massive dolomitization by freshwater-seawater mixing is a myth. Mixing zones tend to form caves without or, at best, with very small amounts of dolomite. The role of coastal mixing zones with respect to dolomitization may be that of a hydrological pump for seawater dolomitization. Reflux dolomitization, most commonly by mesohaline brines that originated from seawater evaporation, is capable of pervasively dolomitizing entire carbonate platforms. However, the extent of dolomitization varies strongly with the extent and duration of evaporation and flooding, and with the subsurface permeability distribution. Complete dolomitization of carbonate platforms appears possible only under favourable circumstances. Similarly, thermal convection in open half-cells (Kohout convection), most commonly by seawater or slightly modified seawater, can form massive dolostones under favourable circumstances, whereas thermal convection in closed cells cannot. Compaction flow cannot form massive dolostones, unless it is funnelled, which may be more common than generally recognized. Neither topography driven flow nor tectonically induced (‘squeegee-type’) flow is likely to form massive dolostones, except under unusual circumstances. Hydrothermal dolomitization may occur in a variety of subsurface diagenetic settings, but has been significantly overrated. It commonly forms massive dolostones that are localized around faults, but regional or basin-wide dolomitization is not hydrothermal.The regionally extensive dolostones of the Bahamas (Cenozoic), western Canada and Ireland (Palaeozoic), and Israel (Mesozoic) probably formed from seawater that was ‘pumped’ through these sequences by thermal convection, reflux, funnelled compaction, or a combination thereof. For such platform settings flushed with seawater, geochemical data and numerical modelling suggest that most dolomites form(ed) at temperatures around 50–80 °C commensurate with depths of 500 to a maximum of 2000 m. The resulting dolostones can be classified both as seawater dolomites and as burial dolomites. This ambiguity is a consequence of the historical evolution of dolomite research.
Dolomitization and carbonate reservoir formation
,DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1231.2010.06586 URL [Cited within: 1]
The potential of carbonate reservoirs is largely controlled by sedimentary environment.The carbonate reservoirs however,are affected by dolomitization,either directly or indirectly by diageneses,such as dissolutions and fractures.Dolomitization can change the carbonate reservoir quality.Also,five situations are involved: the dissolution of dolomitizing fluids,the mole-to-mole or the volume-to-volume replacement of Ca2+ by Mg2+,over-dolomitization by excess fluids,and the enhancement of permeability by dolomitization.In a more indirect way,the porosity or permeability are also enlarged when selective dissolution happens after partly dolomitization.And the formed dolomites are thought apt to resist mechanical and chemical compaction so as to preserve porosities,and apt to develop fractures than the corresponding limestones.Basically,sedimentary conditions are important.It is revealed that the dolomitization is prerequisite,and constructive diageneses other than dolomitization are Key to the formation of effective reservoirs.
Progress of research on dolomitization and dolomite reservoir
,DOI:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.05.0539 URL [Cited within: 1]
Dolomitization and dolomite reservoir are vital research fields in carbonate rocks. Recently,there are many progresses in dolomite with the advancement of experimental techniques and development of petroleum exploration,including: 1 Numerical simulation is applied to the study of dolomitization model gradually. It achieves a conversion of dolomitization model from qualitative analysis to quantitative description and is beneficial for understanding the migration and range of dolomitizing fluids on the regional level. 2 More attention is focused on the research of microbial dolomitization. The morphological features of dolomite associated with microbe and mechanism of biomineralization have been recognized and studied deeply. 3The defects of mixing-zone dolomitization in theory and practice are pointed out,and the application range of this model is limited. 4 The scope of reflux model of dolomitization is extended widely,particularly the reflux of penesaline seawater is considered as a potential for largescale dolomitization in shallow-burial stage. 5The further study of structural controlled hydrothermal dolomitization has come to realize that hydrothermal dolomite can also be associated to convergent settings. The modification of hydrothermal fluids to reservoirs shows characteristics of coexistence of constructive and destructive impacts. The research of relationship between dolomitization and origin of porosity breaks though the traditional knowledge of dolomitization increasing porosity,and emphasizes the ability of dolomitization retaining porosity. 6The main controlling factors of dolomite reservoirs are contributed to the dolomite texture,diagenestic environment and dissolution after emplacement of dolomite. Three aspects should be improved in the future investigations. The first is the quantitative study of evolution of dolomite texture. The second is enhancing the employment of latest geochemical techniques such as Clumped isotope and Mg isotope as well as using the mature methods for research of ore-forming fluids. The third is exploring the mechanism of origin and preservation of dolomite reservoirs in deep burial setting.
Dolomitization by seepage refluxion
,
Movement of subsurface waters under the sabkha, Abu Dhabi, UAE, and its relation to evaporative dolomite genesis
,
The Dorag dolomitization model- application to the Middle Ordovician of Wiscons
,
Late diagenetic dolomitization of Lower Ordovician, Upper Knox Carbonates: A record of the hydrodynamic evolution of the southern Appalachian Basin
,
DOI:10.1002/9781444304077.ch9 URL [Cited within: 3]
Summary The petrographic and geochemical characteristics of a more than 80 m thick sequence of shallow-burial Late Cenozoic dolomites from Little Bahamas Bank (LBB), northern Bahamas, indicate that these dolomites are seawater-derived and partially metastable. Dolomites range in composition between calcian and stoichiometric (Ca .60 Mg .40 CO 3 –Ca .51 Mg .49 CO 3 ). Strontium content and oxygen isotopes covary with the major element composition. It is suggested that part of the 2‰ spread in oxygen isotopic composition is a result of natural and laboratory isotope fractionation. After correction for these effects oxygen isotopes are in equilibrium with seawater at 20–22°C. Iron and manganese content of the dolomites is essentially precursor-controlled. The geometry of one of the dolomite bodies suggests that dolomitization occurred in the seawater phreatic zone. Seawater circulation through LBB was probably driven by an overlying freshwater/mixing zone system during (partial?) platform exposure. Maturation of the metastable dolomites from LBB during future diagenesis may cause evolution of petrographic and geochemical signatures to those typical of many ancient dolomite sequences. Hence, Late Cenozoic dolomites of the Bahamas can be used as analogues for the genesis of many ancient platform dolomites. Their diagenetic potential permits the prediction of secondary diagenesis and the understanding of its impact seen in older platform dolomites.
Structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies: An overview
,DOI:10.1306/05220605164 URL [Cited within: 3]
Failure to precipitate dolomite at 25 °C from dilute solution despite 1000-fold oversaturation after 32 years
,DOI:10.1023/A:1009688315854 URL [Cited within: 1]
Microbial mediation as a possible mechanism for natural dolomite formation at low temperatures
,DOI:10.1038/377220a0 URL [Cited within: 1]
DOLOMITE (CaMg(CO)) is a common carbonate mineral which is found in much greater abundance in ancient rocks than in modern carbonate environments. Why this is so remains a mystery. Over the past 30 years, dolomite formation has been observed in several modern environments, and various thermodynamic, kinetic and hydrological factors have been proposed to explain its formation. But attempts to precipitate dolomite at low temperatures in the laboratory have been unsuccessful, and the 'dolomite problem' remains a source of controversy in sedimentary geology. Here we describe experiments in which a ferroan dolomite with a fairly high degree of cation order was precipitated in the presence of sulphate-reducing bacteria from the Desulfovibrio group. We propose that the direct mediation of these anaerobes can overcome the kinetic barrier to dolomite nucleation, and that they may play an active role in the formation of this mineral in natural environments.
Bacterial sulfate reduction and salinity: Two controls on dolomite precipitation in Lagoa Vermelha and Brejo do Espinho (Brazil)
,DOI:10.1023/A:1021323425591 URL [Cited within: 1]
The hydrological system of Lagoa Vermelha, a dolomite-precipitating lagoon in Brazil, was investigated using hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopic composition of the water collected during an annual cycle (1996–1997). These data demonstrated that dolomite formed in May–June during high saline conditions. High salinity apparently provides the ions and saturation state necessary for dolomite precipitation. Ion concentrations in the lagoon water indicated an identical timing of dolomite precipitation and demonstrated that dolomite formed at decreased sulfate concentrations. In Brejo do Espinho, a neighbouring lagoon, the ion concentrations in the water column revealed that dolomite precipitates throughout the year, most likely due to its higher salinity than Lagoa Vermelha during the measured period. In Lagoa Vermelha, high δ 34 S of pore water sulfate and high sulfide concentrations correlated with dolomitic horizons, demonstrating the association of bacterial sulfate reduction with dolomite formation. In Brejo do Espinho high δ 34 S of pore water sulfate and high sulfide concentrations occurred throughout the dolomitic sedimentary column. We conclude that elevated salinity and sulfate reduction are the main factors inducing dolomite precipitation in these lagoons, confirming the microbial dolomite formation theory. These results suggest that there may be other settings where sulfate-reducing bacteria induce dolomite precipitation under saline conditions, such as deep-sea sediments or sabkhas, and imply that microbial dolomite may significantly contribute to the sedimentary carbonate budget, particularly in the earliest Earth's history when anoxic conditions were more prevalent.
Desulfovibrio brasiliensis sp. nov., a moderate halophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium from Lagoa Vermelha (Brazil) mediating dolomite formation
,DOI:10.1007/s00792-005-0441-8 URL PMID:15856133 [Cited within: 3]
A novel halotolerant sulfate-reducing bacterium, Desulfovibrio brasiliensis strain LVform1, was isolated from sediments of a dolomite-forming hypersaline coastal lagoon, Lagoa Vermelha, in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The cells are vibrio-shaped and 0.30 to 0.45 mu m by 1.0 to 3.5 mu m in size. These bacteria mediate the precipitation of dolomite [CaMg(CO3)(2)] in culture experiments. The strain was identified as a member of the genus Desulfovibrio in the delta-subclass of the Proteobacteria on the basis of its 16S rRNA gene sequence, its physiological and morphological properties. Strain LVform1 is obligate sodium-dependent and grows at NaCl concentrations of up to 15%. The 16S rRNA sequence revealed that this strain is closely related to Desulfovibrio halophilus (96.2% similarity) and to Desulfovibrio oxyclinae (96.8% similarity), which were both isolated from Solar Lake, a hypersaline coastal lake in the Sinai, Egypt. Strain LVform1 is barotolerant, growing under pressures of up to 370 bar (37 MPa). We propose strain LVform1 to be the type strain of a novel species of the genus Desulfovibrio, Desulfovibrio brasiliensis (type strain LVform1 = DSMZ No. 15816 and JCM No. 12178). The GenBank/EMBL accession number for the 16S rDNA sequence of strain LVform1 is AJ544687.
Dolomite formation within microbial mats in the coastal sabkha of Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates)
,DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3091.2009.01121.x URL [Cited within: 2]
Microbial mediation is the only demonstrated mechanism to precipitate dolomite under Earth surface conditions. A link between microbial activity and dolomite formation in the sabkha of Abu Dhabi has, until now, not been evaluated, even though this environment is cited frequently as the type analogue for many ancient evaporitic sequences. Such an evaluation is the purpose of this study, which is based on a geochemical and petrographic investigation of three sites located on the coastal sabkha of Abu Dhabi, along a transect from the intertidal to the supratidal zone. This investigation revealed a close association between microbial mats and dolomite, suggesting that microbes are involved in the mineralization process. Observations using scanning electron microscopy equipped with a cryotransfer system indicate that authigenic dolomite precipitates within the exopolymeric substances constituting the microbial mats. In current models, microbial dolomite precipitation is linked to an active microbial activity that sustains high pH and alkalinity and decreased sulphate concentrations in pore waters. Such models can be applied to the sabkha environment to explain dolomite formation within microbial mats present at the surface of the intertidal zone. By contrast, these models cannot be applied to the supratidal zone, where abundant dolomite is present within buried mats that no longer show signs of intensive microbial activity. As no abiotic mechanism is known to form dolomite at Earth surface conditions, two different hypotheses can reconcile this result. In a first scenario, all of the dolomite present in the supratidal zone formed in the past, when the mats were active at the surface. In a second scenario, dolomite formation continues within the buried and inactive mats. In order to explain dolomite formation in the absence of active microbial metabolisms, a revised microbial model is proposed in which the mineral-template properties of exopolymeric substances play a crucial role.
Dolomite-mediating bacterium isolated from the sabkha of Abu Dhabi(UAE)
,DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2012.01065.x URL [Cited within: 5]
The study of microbe-mineral interactions and the identification of biominerals in sedimentary rocks provide crucial information on the coevolution of life and Earth surface environments. Desulfovibrio brasiliensis, a sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from Lagoa Vermelha (Brazil), is known for its ability to precipitate dolomite, a mineral that is common in the geological record, but difficult to obtain in laboratory experiments simulating Earth's surface conditions. Here, we report on a new bacterial strain capable of precipitating Mg-calcite and Ca-dolomite, isolated from a microbial mat in the sabkha of Abu Dhabi (UAE). The 16S rRNA gene sequence of the isolate revealed a 99.6% identity (i.e. same species) with Desulfovibrio brasiliensis. The presence of the same microbial species at two geographically distant dolomite-forming locations is difficult to explain in terms of pure coincidence. Rather, it suggests that the ability of precipitating dolomite may be a unique characteristic associated with specific strains.
Aerobic microbial dolomite at the nanometer scale: Implications for the geologic record
,DOI:10.1130/G25013A.1 URL [Cited within: 1]
Microbial experiments are the only proven approach to produceexperimental dolomite under Earth's surface conditions. Althoughmicrobial metabolisms are known to induce dolomite precipitationby favoring dolomite growth kinetics, the involvement of microbesin the dolomite nucleation process is poorly understood. Inparticular, the nucleation of microbially mediated dolomiteremains a matter for investigation because the metabolic diversityinvolved in this process has not been fully explored. Hereinwe demonstrate that Halomonas meridiana and Virgibacillus marismortui,two moderately halophilic aerobic bacteria, mediate primaryprecipitation of dolomite at low temperatures (25, 35 C).This report emphasizes the biomineralogical implications fordolomite formation at the nanometer scale. We describe nucleationof dolomite on nanoglobules in intimate association with thebacterial cell surface. A combination of both laboratory cultureexperiments and natural samples reveals that these nanoglobulestructures may be: (1) the initial step for dolomite nucleation,(2) preserved in the geologic record, and (3) used as microbialtracers through time and/or as a proxy for ancient microbialdolomite, as well as other carbonate minerals.
Presence of sulfate does not inhibit low-temperature dolomite precipitation
,DOI:10.1016/j.epsl.2009.06.003 URL [Cited within: 1]
The hypothesis that sulfate inhibits dolomite formation evolved from geochemical studies of porewaters from deep-sea sedimentary sequences and has been tested with hydrothermal experiments. We examined the sulfate inhibition factor using aerobic culture experiments with Virgibacillus marismortui and Halomonas meridiana, two moderately halophilic aerobic bacteria, which metabolize independent of sulfate concentration. The culture experiments were conducted at 25 and 3502°C using variable SO 4 261 concentrations (0, 14, 28 and 5602mM) and demonstrate that halophilic aerobic bacteria mediate direct precipitation of dolomite with or without SO 4 261 in the culture media which simulate dolomite occurrences commonly found under the Earth's surface conditions. Hence, we report that the presence of sulfate does not inhibit dolomite precipitation. Further, we hypothesize that, if sedimentary dolomite is a direct precipitate, as in our low-temperature culture experiments, the kinetic factors involved are likely to be quite different from those governing a dolomite replacement reaction, such as in hydrothermal experiments. Consequently, the occurrence and, presumably, growth of dolomite in SO 4 261-rich aerobic cultures may shed new light on the long-standing Dolomite Problem.
Ordered low-temperature dolomite mediated by carboxyl-group density of microbial cell walls
,DOI:10.1306/05171312168 URL [Cited within: 2]
Microbial precipitation of dolomite in methanogenic groundwater
,DOI:10.1130/G20246.2 URL [Cited within: 1]
Precipitation of low-temperature dolomite from an anaerobic microbial consortium: The role of methanogenic Archaea
,DOI:10.1111/j.1472-4669.2009.00210.x URL PMID:19663931 [Cited within: 1]
Here we report precipitation of dolomite at low temperature (30 00°C) mediated by a mixed anaerobic microbial consortium composed of dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria (DIRB), fermenters, and methanogens. Initial solution geochemistry is controlled by DIRB, but after 90 days shifts to a system dominated by methanogens. In live experiments conditions are initially saturated with respect to dolomite (0208dol = 19.40) and increase by two orders of magnitude (0208dol = 2 330.77) only after the onset of methanogenesis, as judged by the increasing [CH4] and the detection of methanogenic micro-organisms. We identify ordered dolomite in live microcosms after 90 days via powder X-ray diffraction, while sterile controls precipitate only calcite. Scanning electron microscopy and transmitted electron microscopy demonstrate that the precipitated dolomite is closely associated with cell walls and putative extra-cellular polysaccharides. Headspace gas measurements and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis confirm the presence of both autotrophic and acetoclastic methanogens and exclude the presence of DIRB and sulfate-reducing bacteria after dolomite begins forming. Furthermore, the absence of dolomite in the controls and prior to methanogenesis confirm that methanogenic Archaea are necessary for the low-temperature precipitation of dolomite under the experimental conditions tested.
Porosity through dolomitization: Conservation- of-mass requirements
,
Burial diagenesis and hydrocarbon migration in platform limestones: A conceptual model based on the Upper Jurassic of the Gulf Coast of USA
,
Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture
,
Characteristics, origin and distribution of dolomite reservoirs in Lower-Middle Cambrian, Tarim Basin, NW China
,DOI:10.1016/S1876-3804(16)30040-4 URL [Cited within: 3]
The fault-reservoir displacement pressure differential method, as a quantitative evaluation method of fault sealing which considering diagenetic time of fault rock, was improved based on the study of fault sealing mechanism and its influencing factors. A geology and mathematical model of quantitative evaluation of fault sealing considering diagenetic time was established. First, the depth of surrounding rock which has the same shale content and diagenetic degree as the fault rocks at the target was determined using the method of successive approximation at the given step length. Second, the displacement pressure of target fault rocks was calculated based on the relationship between the displacement pressure and the product of shale content and burial depth that was established for the study area. And third, the sealing states and capacity of the faults were quantitatively evaluated by comparing the calculated displacement pressure with that of the target reservoir. By the actual data of reservoirs at Banqiao Fault in Qikou sag and the result comparison between fault rock shale content method (SGR) and fault-reservoir displacement pressure differential method without considering the diagenetic time, it is verified that this method is more feasible and credible.
Control of Neogene global eustasy on dolomitization: Revelation to the origin of dolomitization in paleostrata
,Dolostones in palaeostrata suffered complex diagenesis,so the origin of dolomization has been a multiple solution problem.Core samples of the shallow-buried Neogene dolostones from drilled wells in the Xisha Islands,South China Sea,is chosen for studying the origin of dolomization to presume upon some revelation for the dolomization in palaeostrata.It is shown that the dolostones develop under the weathering crust,which means they were in the cycles of sea level decline during deposition,and it is proved that dolomization is controlled by periodic global eustasy.The fact that the beds with dolomitization correspond to relatively low palaeotemperature and relatively high palaeosalinity of seawater reveals that glacial periods lead to sea level declines and lead to seawater condensation,which brings about the dolomization.The alternating glacial/interglacial periods bring in sea level changes which lead to periodical changes of seawater nature and accordingly periodical dolomization to take place.That is the reason why there are the situations of periodical dolostone/limestone superposition in the Xisha Islands.By correlating the origin of dolostones in Neogene strata with that of dolostones in palaeostrata,it is enlightened that the so-called burial dolostone distributed extensively in palaeostrata should be derive from penecontemporaneous dolostone that has suffered burial fluid reformation due to seawater condensation so that they exhibit the characteristics of burial dolostone.It is discovered also that the limestones above weathering crusts are of almost same pore type and porosity with the dolostones under weathering crusts in the Xisha Islands.
Partial dolomitization of a Pennsylvanian limestone buildup by hydrothermal fluids and its effect on reservoir quality and performance
,DOI:10.1306/02141110117 URL [Cited within: 1]
Dolostones from Grand Cayman, British West Indies
,DOI:10.1306/122001720559 URL [Cited within: 1]
Abstract Pervasively dolomitized Tertiary strata on Grand Cayman are dominated by heterogeneous dolostones that are composed of both low-Ca calcium dolomite (LCD 55 mol % CaCO3). Homogeneous dolostones, formed of either LCD or HCD, are rare. Some dolostones contain dolomite crystals that are characterized by oscillatory zones (1-10 mum thick) of LCD and HCD, whereas others have rims of LCD surrounding cores of HCD. In some dolostones, bioclasts formed of LCD are embedded in a matrix of HCD. An similar to 1parts per thousand delta(18)O difference between the LCD and HCD can be attributed to the natural covariance that exists between the delta(18)O and mol % CaCO3 in dolomite. There are no significant differences in the Sr-87/Sr-86 ratios of the LCD and HCD. There is no consistent vertical or lateral pattern to the distribution of LCD and HCD in the Cayman dolostones even in closely spaced sampling sites. Such variability is more consistent with growth of individual dolomite crystals being controlled by processes that operated around the surfaces of individual crystals rather than by large-scale changes in the dolomitizing fluids. This interpretation is consistent with the development of oscillatory zoning, which is attributed to precipitation of different phases or minerals from the same parent fluid because of competition between interface-controlled and diffusion-controlled growth kinetics. Dolomitization of the Tertiary strata on Grand Cayman was probably mediated by seawater or modified seawater. Nevertheless, small-scale intrinsic factors controlled the incorporation of Ca in the dolomite lattice and, accordingly, the geochemical parameters that are intimately linked to the mol % CaCO3. These small-scale intrinsic controls must be factored into any model to explain the formation of Tertiary island dolostones.
Review and Prospectives of Microbial Carbonate Reservoirs
,
Evolution of the 87Sr/ 86Sr composition of Neoproterozoic seawater. Paleogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
,DOI:10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.02.028 URL [Cited within: 1]
The limited availability and low resolution of biostratigraphic and radiometric data in the Precambrian necessitate using marine chemostratigraphy to correlate and integrate the fragmentary stratigraphic record. We present a new composite record of the strontium isotope composition of seawater during the Neoproterozoic (1000–54202Ma) Era that is linked to a high-resolution δ 13C (carbonate) compilation. The 87Sr/ 86Sr record consists predominantly of new and previously published data from carbonate-rich successions in northwest Canada, Svalbard, and northern Namibia. Published data from other late Neoproterozoic successions are conservatively included to fill in the Ediacaran Period (635–54202Ma). Consistent with previous compilations, the resulting strontium isotope record shows a systematic rise in 87Sr/ 86Sr throughout the Neoproterozoic, from as low as 0.7055 at the beginning of the era to greater than 0.7085 towards the end. Though the record remains poorly resolved and time-calibrated, it appears that declines, inflections, and rapid changes in 87Sr/ 86Sr all correspond to major biogeochemical or climatic events. However, this record supports neither a tight coupling between δ 13C and 87Sr/ 86Sr via continental erosion nor widespread mountain-building as the main driver for increasing 87Sr/ 86Sr compositions during the Neoproterozoic. Rather, the steady rise in 87Sr/ 86Sr during the Neoproterozoic corresponded to the break-up of the supercontinent Rodinia.
Genesis of Lower Ordovician dolomite in Central Tarim Basin
,DOI:10.1007/s11442-011-0836-7 URL [Cited within: 1]
Lower Ordovician dolomites in the central Tarim basin are of various types and extensively distributed.Seven dolostone types could be documented based on fabrics and structures,which are crystalline dolomite,residual-grain dolomite,residual calcite dolomite,algal dolomite,cloudy centers and clear rims dolomite,clitellum dolomite and gypes dolomite.It's characterised by middle-high δ18O negative value(-3.2%~-8.7‰),low-middle δ13C negative value(-3%~-0.77‰),and high Z value of 118~123.Most diagenetic temperature calculated by empirical formulas using δ18O values are between 118 to 123℃,which indicates that the temperature degree of dolomitization is low,and so the kind of dolomite belongs to low temperature dolostone.These dolomites have also characteristics of low Mg/Ca and variable Fe/Mn ratio values.According to mineral composition analyzed by electron microprobe,dolomite monomineral can be divided into high Fe content and low Fe content species.87Sr/86Sr ratios of most samples are low(among 0.708 8~0.709 7),which are similar to seawater strontium isotope composition,and some are of high ratios between 0.710 1 and 0.710 9.These characteristics reveal that the origin of dolomite in the study area can be classified into penecontemporaneous dolomitization and burial dolomitization.According to Ordovican palaeogeographical evolution,the penecontemporaneous dolomitization arised in the seafloor environment,mainly in tidal flats or beach environment.And this kind of dolomite characterised by low diagenetic temperature,low 87Sr/86Sr ratios,and low Fe content dolomite minerals.The burial dolomitization can be interpreted by two diagentic models.One is seepage-reflux dolomitization during early shallow burial stage and characterised by low diagenetic temperature but high 87Sr/86Sr ratios,and high Fe content dolomite mineral.Another is deep burial dolomitization which occured in more strong reducible diagenetic enviornment during late deep burial stage.In general,the degree of dolomitization in burial diagentic enviorment is further enhanced and adjusted.The deep burial dolomite is characterised by high diagenetic temperature and high homogenization temperature of fluid inclusions,but low salinity.
Thermal waters of volcanic origin
,DOI:10.1130/0016-7606(1957)68[1637:TWOVO]2.0.CO;2 URL [Cited within: 1]
Depositional and digenetic history of Pliocene- Pleistocene carbonates of northwestern Great Bahama Bank; evolution of a carbonate platform
,
Effects of dolomitization in carbonate rocks on reservoir porosity in the Dongying Depression.
,The paper studied the effects of dolomitization in carbonates to the porosity of reseveiors in the Dongying depressing by analyzing the carbonate samples.The results showed that the number of the inter-granular pores increases or keep same,and that intercrystalline pores and intracrystalline micropores are formed to increase the specific surface area.Dolomite has a better ability to resist the pressed solution due to the better ability to resist pressure.The existing of micropores and intergranular pores promotes the transportation of subsequent acidic fluids to form intraclastic graistones and oolite and eventually to form dissolution pores.Therefore,dolomitization has important influences on the properties of carbonate reservoir.
Genesis of dolomites in limestone of Yingshan Formation and their effects on poroperm characteristics of carbonate reservoir in Tahe area
,
Closed-system dolomitization and the significance for petroleum and economic geology: An example from Feixianguan carbonates, Triassic, NE Sichuan basin of China
,
Carbonate porosity versus depth: A predictable relation for south Florida
,
High porosity Cenozoic carbonate rocks of south Florida: Progressive loss of porosity with depth
,
Major factors controlling the development of marine carbonate reservoirs
,DOI:10.1016/S1876-3804(15)30055-0 URL [Cited within: 1]
Through case study of reef-shoal, karst and dolostone reservoirs in the Tarim and Sichuan Basins, the material base and the mechanisms of porosity creation, modification and preservation of carbonate reservoirs were examined carefully in order to figure out the major factors controlling the development of various types of carbonate reservoirs. Three factors control the development of carbonate reservoirs: (1) carbonate sediments of reef-shoal facies are the material base for not only reef-shoal reservoirs, but also dolostone and karst reservoirs; (2) epigenetic environment is crucial for porosity creation, i.e. reservoir space in ancient carbonates includes primary depositional porosity and/or secondary dissolution pores caused by epigenetic, freshwater dissolution; and (3) burial environment is the setting for porosity modification and preservation. There is no carbonate reservoirs of solely one origin, carbonate reservoirs are all the products of the combined effect of the above three factors. The four main controlling factors, reef-shoal sediments, epigenetic karstification, evaporation facies belt and burial-thermal fluid dissolution give rise to the reef-shoal, karst, sedimentary dolostone and burial-hydrothermal alteration dolostone reservoirs respectively.
/
〈 | 〉 |